From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Javier Martinez Canillas Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] thermal: exynos: Fixes for vtmu-supply regulator handling Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 10:30:33 -0300 Message-ID: <56DED3F9.8050505@osg.samsung.com> References: <1455819551-4666-1-git-send-email-javier@osg.samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1455819551-4666-1-git-send-email-javier@osg.samsung.com> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Kukjin Kim , Krzysztof Kozlowski , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Kumar Gala , Ian Campbell , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Pawel Moll , Zhang Rui , Mark Rutland , Eduardo Valentin , Lukasz Majewski List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hello Lukasz, Eduardo, On 02/18/2016 03:19 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > Hello, > > On a recent patch series to build a PMIC chip as a module [0], Krzysztof > asked me to check if all the consumer drivers, using the resources that > this PMIC provides, already support probe deferral. > > While investigating that, I noticed that the Exynos TMU didn't do it so > this series fix that bug and other two minor issues that I noticed while > reviewing the driver and its DT binding. > > The series are on top of Krzysztof's patches [1,2,3] not because there's > a dependency but to avoid merge conflicts with in-flight patches. Please > let me know if you prefer to use a different base instead. > > [0]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/11/857 > [1]: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8345791/ > [2]: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8345741/ > [3]: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8345701/ > > Best regards, > Javier > Any comments about this series? Best regards, -- Javier Martinez Canillas Open Source Group Samsung Research America