From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Boyd Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/12] ARM: dts: dragonboard-600c: add board support with serial Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 13:07:42 -0700 Message-ID: <56F2F78E.8050002@codeaurora.org> References: <1458762366-9233-1-git-send-email-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org> <1458762442-9492-1-git-send-email-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1458762442-9492-1-git-send-email-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org> Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Srinivas Kandagatla , Andy Gross , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-soc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 03/23/2016 12:47 PM, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote: > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064-dragonboard-600c.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064-dragonboard-600c.dts > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..e96aab6 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064-dragonboard-600c.dts > @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@ > +#include "qcom-apq8064-v2.0.dtsi" > + > +/ { > + model = "Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. APQ8064 DragonBoard600c"; > + compatible = "qcom,apq8064-dragonboard600c", "qcom,apq8064"; Does the bootloader look at this string at all or is it using appended DTB design? I'm mostly worried about having that qcom,apq8064-dragonboard600c part. It should probably be qcom,apq8064-sbc or something like that instead. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project