From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Boyd Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/17] qcom: ipq4019: add cpu operating points for cpufreq support Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 15:33:32 -0700 Message-ID: <56F319BC.5050405@codeaurora.org> References: <1458770712-10880-1-git-send-email-mmcclint@codeaurora.org> <1458770712-10880-16-git-send-email-mmcclint@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1458770712-10880-16-git-send-email-mmcclint-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Matthew McClintock , andy.gross-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-msm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org Cc: qca-upstream.external-A+ZNKFmMK5xy9aJCnZT0Uw@public.gmane.org, David Brown , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Russell King , "open list:ARM/QUALCOMM SUPPORT" , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , "moderated list:ARM PORT" , open list List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 03/23/2016 03:05 PM, Matthew McClintock wrote: > This adds some operating points for cpu frequeny scaling > > Signed-off-by: Matthew McClintock > --- Can you use the v2 OPP bindings instead? I imagine uV could be left out then because there isn't any regulator control? -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html