From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: shuah Subject: Re: [PATCH v18 00/19] kunit: introduce KUnit, the Linux kernel unit testing framework Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2019 15:59:10 -0600 Message-ID: <56e2e1a7-f8fe-765b-8452-1710b41895bf@kernel.org> References: <20190923090249.127984-1-brendanhiggins@google.com> <20191004213812.GA24644@mit.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Torvalds , "Theodore Y. Ts'o" Cc: Brendan Higgins , Frank Rowand , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Josh Poimboeuf , Kees Cook , kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com, Luis Chamberlain , Peter Zijlstra , robh@kernel.org, Stephen Boyd , Masahiro Yamada , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel , kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, "open list:DOCUMENTATION" , linux-fsdevel , Linux Kbuild mailing list , Linux Kernel Mailing List , open list:KERNEL SELFTEST F List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 10/4/19 3:42 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 2:39 PM Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote: >> >> This question is primarily directed at Shuah and Linus.... >> >> What's the current status of the kunit series now that Brendan has >> moved it out of the top-level kunit directory as Linus has requested? > The move happened smack in the middle of merge window and landed in linux-next towards the end of the merge window. > We seemed to decide to just wait for 5.5, but there is nothing that > looks to block that. And I encouraged Shuah to find more kunit cases > for when it _does_ get merged. > Right. I communicated that to Brendan that we could work on adding more kunit based tests which would help get more mileage on the kunit. > So if the kunit branch is stable, and people want to start using it > for their unit tests, then I think that would be a good idea, and then > during the 5.5 merge window we'll not just get the infrastructure, > we'll get a few more users too and not just examples. > thanks, -- Shuah