Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] iio:magnetometer:ak8975: mounting matrix support

[Jonathan Cameron <jic23-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>]

On 29/03/16 10:44, Gregor Boirie wrote:
> 
> 
> On 03/28/2016 05:03 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> 
> [snip...]
> 
>>
>> Why is the sysfs interface specific to ak8975?
>>>> AFAIK, this is just the first IIO driver implementation relying on floating
>>>> point numbers. Should a single driver be enough to justify a "generic" API,
>>>> I suppose code could be factored out in a similar way to over sampling rate
>>>> support. People could call this on a per-driver basis.
>>> Given it is an ABI, yes I think so. We don't want to end up with a
>>> bunch of similar yet different interfaces.
>>>
>> Absolutely.  Most interfaces get made up based on one implementation ;)
>> A second is always nice, but here the interface is obvious enough we don't
>> need to wait.
> Right. I'll post a separate patch then.
>>>>> Furthermore, why is it specific to magnetometer? Couldn't
>>>>> accelerometers need the same thing? There's a thread discussing a
>>>>> similar matrix on android-x86[1].
>>>> Same may apply to gyro / accelero / imu and magnetometers at least.
>>>> inv_mpu_core.c already implements such a rotation matrix exposed as 3x3 integers
>>>> array. Should we be smart enough to keep this compatible with existing userspace
>>>> apps ?
>>> You have to maintain the ABI. If both interfaces can co-exist, then
>>> you can have both and mark the old one as deprecated. In time we can
>>> remove the old one.
>> If you want to (or someone else does) it would be good to add the new abi to
>> inv_mpu_core as well and indeed mark the old one as deprecated.
>> The cost of keeping it is negligible, so we may never actually bother to
>> remove it.
> What's the better way to mark this as deprecated ? dev_warn() ? __deprecated ?
> Anything else ?
Probably just documentation at this stage - anything else will be a pita for
anyone using that driver. As long as it is clear in any docs + the code, which
is the preferred option that's fine.  I doubt we'll ever bother removing the
old way.

Jonathan
>>>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/magnetometer/ak8975.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/magnetometer/ak8975.txt
>>>>>> index 34a3206..f936f86 100644
>>>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/magnetometer/ak8975.txt
>>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/magnetometer/ak8975.txt
>>>>>> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ Optional properties:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     - gpios : should be device tree identifier of the magnetometer DRDY pin
>>>>>>     - vdd-supply: an optional regulator that needs to be on to provide VDD
>>>>>> +  - matrix: an optional 3x3 mounting rotation matrix
>>>>> Perhaps "rotation-matrx" would be a better name in case there's ever
>>>>> any other matrix needed.
>>>> What about "mounting-matrix" ?
>>> Sure.
>> Works for me as well.
>>> Rob
>>> -- 
>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
>>> the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
>>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>>
> 
> -- 
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
> the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html