From: Frank Rowand <frowand.list-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: Pantelis Antoniou
<pantelis.antoniou-OWPKS81ov/FWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux
<linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
Masahiro Yamada
<yamada.masahiro-uWyLwvC0a2jby3iVrkZq2A@public.gmane.org>,
devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List
<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
linux-arm-kernel
<linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [Question] refcount of DT node
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 09:10:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <570FC104.80808@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <06E9E2D3-4627-4970-ABBB-34B5ED620709-OWPKS81ov/FWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
On 4/14/2016 3:02 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
>> On Apr 14, 2016, at 12:59 , Mark Rutland <mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 09:48:49AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 04:47:57PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>>>> Hi experts.
>>>>
>>>> My understanding of refcount of DT node is poor.
>>>
>>> The message from DT people is... don't worry about DT node refcounting.
>>> Do whatever you want with it, they don't care whether you have correct
>>> refcounting or not.
>>>
>>> The background behind that is that I've tried to fix the refcounting,
>>> and even had the coccinelle people generate some stuff to work on this
>>> issue, but DT people's attitude towards it is "don't bother".
>>>
>>> So yes, people may get it wrong, but it seems it's something that DT
>>> people want ignored.
>>
>> I'm not sure that's quite fair; the last discussion I recall about this
>> ended up concluding that we need a better API, rather than papering over
>> problems.
>>
>> That said, there isn't much obvious progress on that front.
>>
>> Frank, Pantelis, Rob, were there any conclusions on this from ELC, or is
>> this something that needs someone to propose something?
>>
>
> Frank mentioned that he wants a new API. I have some ideas about it too.
>
> My take is that drivers should never do reference counting, we have to figure
> out a way for DT access using copy semantics or locks.
>
> References would still be required for core DT code, but that’s a sane subset.
Yes. Nothing concrete about implementation was decided at ELC, but this issue
is on my todo list.
-Frank
>
>> Mark.
>>
>> [1] http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.devicetree/153777
>
> Regards
>
> — Pantelis
>
> .
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-14 16:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-14 7:47 [Question] refcount of DT node Masahiro Yamada
2016-04-14 8:48 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
[not found] ` <20160414084849.GT19428-l+eeeJia6m9vn6HldHNs0ANdhmdF6hFW@public.gmane.org>
2016-04-14 9:59 ` Mark Rutland
2016-04-14 10:02 ` Pantelis Antoniou
[not found] ` <06E9E2D3-4627-4970-ABBB-34B5ED620709-OWPKS81ov/FWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2016-04-14 16:10 ` Frank Rowand [this message]
2016-04-14 17:02 ` Rob Herring
2016-04-14 18:38 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-04-16 15:02 ` Masahiro Yamada
[not found] ` <CAK7LNATFUW2KXUpFas6C_SJ0C7Qb1DWU0njLg-FCYciK2U6Oag-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2016-04-14 10:10 ` Mark Rutland
2016-04-14 10:40 ` Pantelis Antoniou
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=570FC104.80808@gmail.com \
--to=frowand.list-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org \
--cc=devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=pantelis.antoniou-OWPKS81ov/FWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=yamada.masahiro-uWyLwvC0a2jby3iVrkZq2A@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).