Re: [PATCH 3/6] soc/tegra: pmc: Add support for IO pads power state and voltage

[Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>]

On Tuesday 03 May 2016 06:04 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
> On 02/05/16 13:17, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>> +
>> +	return tegra_io_rail_power_on(dpd_bit);
>  From a readability standpoint the above seems weird because
> tegra_io_pads_power_enable() takes an ID as the argument, translates it
> to a bit value and passes it to tegra_io_rail_power_on() which also
> takes an ID for the argument.

Yaah, I did not want to duplicate the implementation and hence it is there.
We will get rid of the older APIs once this is IN and new mechanism there.



>> +
>> +	bval = (io_volt_uv == 3300000) ? BIT(pwr_bit) : 0;
>> +
>> +	mutex_lock(&pmc->powergates_lock);
>> +	tegra_pmc_read_modify_write(PMC_PWR_DET, BIT(pwr_bit), BIT(pwr_bit));
>> +	tegra_pmc_read_modify_write(PMC_PWR_DET_VAL, BIT(pwr_bit), bval);
>> +	mutex_unlock(&pmc->powergates_lock);
> There are 4 instances of BIT(pwr_bit). May be we should do this once or
> have tegra_io_pads_to_power_val() return the bit?

OK, will re-write this part.


>
>> +int tegra_io_pads_power_disable(int io_pad_id);
>> +int tegra_io_pads_power_is_enabled(int io_pad_id);
> What I don't like here, is now we have two public APIs to do the same
> job because tegra_io_pads_power_enable/disable() calls
> tegra_io_rail_power_off/on() internally. Furthermore, the two APIs use
> different ID definitions to accomplish the same job. This shouldn't be
> necessary.

Currently SOR driver is using the tegra_io_rail_power_off/on() APIs. 
Once the proper interface available then I will move sor driver to use 
new method and then we can full get rid of older APIs and macros.

Till that, we need to have this.

>