From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 20/22] ARM: dts: exynos: Move common Exynos5410/542x/5800 nodes to new DTSI Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 07:33:06 +0200 Message-ID: <57317292.2080004@kernel.org> References: <1462734367-5619-1-git-send-email-krzk@kernel.org> <1462734367-5619-21-git-send-email-krzk@kernel.org> <9e642e0d-87e1-4661-0233-acecf0082f24@osg.samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-reply-to: <9e642e0d-87e1-4661-0233-acecf0082f24@osg.samsung.com> Sender: linux-clk-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Javier Martinez Canillas , Kukjin Kim , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Sylwester Nawrocki , Tomasz Figa , Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 05/09/2016 11:53 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > Hello Krzysztof, > > On 05/08/2016 03:06 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> The Exynos5410/542x/5800 are very similar designs. Create new new > > s/new new/a new > >> DTSI with common nodes to remove DTS duplication. Although currently >> only MCT and SysRAM are shared but in future more nodes will be added to >> common file. >> >> The patch should not have functional impact. >> > > A nice way to check this is to diff the disassembled compiled DTBs with > and without the patch and making sure that the resulted DTS is the same. Yes, that is what I've done. Recently there is a tool making that even easier: dtx_diff. Best regards, Krzysztof