From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "David.Wu" Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 6/8] dt-bindings: i2c: rk3x: add support for rk3399 Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 09:14:04 +0800 Message-ID: <5733D8DC.1010603@rock-chips.com> References: <1462908252-27016-1-git-send-email-david.wu@rock-chips.com> <1462908647-27236-1-git-send-email-david.wu@rock-chips.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-i2c-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Doug Anderson Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Heiko_St=c3=bcbner?= , Wolfram Sang , Rob Herring , Andy Shevchenko , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Brian Norris , David Riley , Tao Huang , Lin Huang , Jianqun Xu , Chris , Eddie Cai , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." , "linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Doug, =E5=9C=A8 2016/5/12 0:35, Doug Anderson =E5=86=99=E9=81=93: > Hi, > > On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 12:30 PM, David Wu = wrote: >> The bus clock and function clock are separated at rk3399, >> and others use one clock as the bus clock and function clock. >> >> Signed-off-by: David Wu >> Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson >> --- >> Change in v8: >> - remove error description. >> >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-rk3x.txt | 16 ++++++++++= +++--- >> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-rk3x.txt b/Do= cumentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-rk3x.txt >> index 0b4a85f..5429301 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-rk3x.txt >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-rk3x.txt >> @@ -6,10 +6,20 @@ RK3xxx SoCs. >> Required properties : >> >> - reg : Offset and length of the register set for the device >> - - compatible : should be "rockchip,rk3066-i2c", "rockchip,rk3188-i= 2c", >> - "rockchip,rk3228-i2c" or "rockchip,rk3288-i2c". >> + - compatible: should be one of the following: >> + - "rockchip,rk3066-i2c": for rk3066 >> + - "rockchip,rk3188-i2c": for rk3188 >> + - "rockchip,rk3228-i2c": for rk3228 >> + - "rockchip,rk3288-i2c": for rk3288 >> + - "rockchip,rk3399-i2c": for rk3399 >> - interrupts : interrupt number >> - - clocks : parent clock >> + - clocks: See ../clock/clock-bindings.txt >> + - For older hardware (rk3066, rk3188, rk3228, rk3288): >> + - There is one clock that's used both to derive the functional= clock >> + for the device and as the bus clock. >> + - For newer hardware (rk3399): specified by name >> + - "i2c": REQUIRED. This is used to derive the functional clock= =2E >> + - "pclk": REQUIRED. This is the bus clock. > > Depending on what Rob thinks, it might make sense to remove the above > two "REQUIRED" bits. That would match his earlier feedback since > we're still in the "Required" section and thus it is redundant. > Okay, i make a little misunderstand for that, so i will fix it in next=20 version. > -Doug > > >