From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Florian Fainelli Subject: Re: [PATCH] phy: add support for a reset-gpio specification Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 10:29:44 -0700 Message-ID: <573A0388.2010002@gmail.com> References: <1463047233-18091-1-git-send-email-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> <20160516.132307.165371654494650235.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20160516.132307.165371654494650235.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller , u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de, afd@ti.com, nm@ti.com List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 05/16/2016 10:23 AM, David Miller wrote: > From: Uwe Kleine-K=C3=B6nig > Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 12:00:33 +0200 >=20 >> The framework only asserts (for now) that the reset gpio is not acti= ve. >> >> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-K=C3=B6nig >=20 > Applied. Humm that was a little too quick IMHO, there are two concurrent patches adressing the same problem right now, and Uwe's patch relies on a specific "quirk" of specifying the Ethernet PHY's full OUI in the Devic= e Tree compatible string, while Sergei's approach does not require that..= =2E AFAICT, the binding portion of the patch was also still being discussed= =2E I guess we will have to submit incremental patches now. --=20 =46lorian