From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] of/numa: fix a memory@ node can only contains one memory block Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2016 09:24:56 +0800 Message-ID: <5754D0E8.8070009@huawei.com> References: <1464427377-12712-1-git-send-email-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> <1464427377-12712-3-git-send-email-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> <574F8DA8.4040503@huawei.com> <20160603094520.GF9915@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20160603094520.GF9915@arm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Will Deacon Cc: Rob Herring , devicetree , David Daney , Catalin Marinas , Xinwei Hu , Hanjun Guo , linux-kernel , Robert Richter , Zefan Li , Tianhong Ding , Grant Likely , Ganapatrao Kulkarni , Frank Rowand , linux-arm-kernel List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 2016/6/3 17:45, Will Deacon wrote: > On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 09:36:40AM +0800, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote: >> On 2016/6/2 4:13, Rob Herring wrote: >>> I believe you still need this and not the one above. You only need it >>> within the loop if you return. Otherwise, the last node always need to >>> be put. >> >> OK. Thanks. >> >> Addition with Matthias's suggestion, I will move "return" into this patch, >> so that this of_node_put(np) can be safely removed. > > Do you want to include Kefeng's [1] patches in your series too? We don't > need two sets of related NUMA cleanups :) Yes, It's originally suggested by Joe Perches. > > Will > > [1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2016-June/432715.html > > . >