From: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
To: Joseph Lo <josephl@nvidia.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>,
Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Matthew Longnecker <MLongnecker@nvidia.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] Documentation: dt-bindings: mailbox: tegra: Add binding for HSP mailbox
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 09:28:00 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5773E900.8060903@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57736311.6020304@nvidia.com>
On 06/28/2016 11:56 PM, Joseph Lo wrote:
> On 06/29/2016 03:08 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 06/28/2016 03:15 AM, Joseph Lo wrote:
>>> On 06/27/2016 11:55 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>>> On 06/27/2016 03:02 AM, Joseph Lo wrote:
> snip.
>>>
>>> Currently the usage of HSP HW in the downstream kernel is something like
>>> the model below.
>>>
>>> remote_processor_A-\
>>> remote_processor_B--->hsp@1000 (doorbell func) <-> host CPU
>>> remote_processor_C-/
>>>
>>> remote_processor_D -> hsp@2000 (shared mailbox) <-> CPU
>>>
>>> remote_processor_E -> hsp@3000 (shared mailbox) <-> CPU
>>>
>>> I am thinking if we can just add the appropriate compatible strings for
>>> it to replace "nvidia,tegra186-hsp". e.g. "nvidia,tegra186-hsp-doorbell"
>>> and "nvidia,tegra186-hsp-sharedmailbox". So the driver can probe and
>>> initialize correctly depend on the compatible property. How do you think
>>> about it? Is this the same as the (b) you mentioned above?
>>
>> Yes, that would be (b) above.
>>
>> However, please do note (a): I expect that splitting things up will turn
>> out to be a mistake, as it has for other HW modules in the past. I would
>> far rather see a single hsp node in DT, since there is a single HSP
>> block in HW. Sure that block has multiple sub-functions. However, there
>> is common logic that affects all of those sub-functions and binds
>> everything into a single HW module. If you represent the HW module using
>> multiple different DT nodes, it will be hard to correctly represent that
>> common logic. Conversely, I see no real advantage to splitting up the DT
>> node. I strongly believe we should have a single "hsp" node in DT.
>
> We have 6 HSP block in HW. FYI.
Yes, we have 6 /instances/ of the overall HSP block. Those should each
have their own node, since they're entirely separate modules, all
instances of the same configurable IP block.
Above, I was talking about the sub-blocks within each HSP instance,
which should all be represented into a single node per instance, for a
total of 6 DT nodes overall.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-29 15:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-27 9:02 [PATCH 00/10] arm64: tegra: add BPMP support Joseph Lo
2016-06-27 9:02 ` [PATCH 01/10] Documentation: dt-bindings: mailbox: tegra: Add binding for HSP mailbox Joseph Lo
[not found] ` <20160627090248.23621-2-josephl-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2016-06-27 15:55 ` Stephen Warren
[not found] ` <57714C85.50802-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>
2016-06-28 9:15 ` Joseph Lo
[not found] ` <57724039.7080007-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2016-06-28 19:08 ` Stephen Warren
2016-06-29 5:56 ` Joseph Lo
2016-06-29 15:28 ` Stephen Warren [this message]
2016-06-30 9:25 ` Joseph Lo
[not found] ` <5774E599.4000204-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2016-06-30 16:02 ` Stephen Warren
[not found] ` <5775427B.9040907-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>
2016-07-01 2:23 ` Joseph Lo
2016-06-27 9:02 ` [PATCH 02/10] mailbox: tegra-hsp: Add HSP(Hardware Synchronization Primitives) driver Joseph Lo
2016-06-27 9:02 ` [PATCH 03/10] Documentation: dt-bindings: firmware: tegra: add bindings of the BPMP Joseph Lo
[not found] ` <20160627090248.23621-4-josephl-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2016-06-27 16:08 ` Stephen Warren
[not found] ` <57714F7D.1040301-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>
2016-06-28 9:16 ` Joseph Lo
2016-06-27 9:02 ` [PATCH 04/10] firmware: tegra: add IVC library Joseph Lo
2016-06-27 9:02 ` [PATCH 05/10] firmware: tegra: add BPMP support Joseph Lo
2016-06-27 9:02 ` [PATCH 06/10] soc/tegra: Add Tegra186 support Joseph Lo
[not found] ` <20160627090248.23621-1-josephl-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2016-06-27 9:02 ` [PATCH 07/10] arm64: defconfig: Enable Tegra186 SoC Joseph Lo
2016-06-27 9:02 ` [PATCH 08/10] arm64: dts: tegra: Add Tegra186 support Joseph Lo
2016-06-27 9:02 ` [PATCH 10/10] arm64: dts: tegra: Add NVIDIA P2771 board support Joseph Lo
2016-06-27 9:02 ` [PATCH 09/10] arm64: dts: tegra: Add NVIDIA Tegra186 P3310 main " Joseph Lo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5773E900.8060903@wwwdotorg.org \
--to=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
--cc=MLongnecker@nvidia.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gnurou@gmail.com \
--cc=jassisinghbrar@gmail.com \
--cc=josephl@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=pdeschrijver@nvidia.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).