From: Caesar Wang <wxt@rock-chips.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
cf@rock-chips.com, huangtao@rock-chips.com,
jay.xu@rock-chips.com, David Wu <david.wu@rock-chips.com>,
Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/perf: arm-pmu: Handle per-interrupt affinity mask
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2016 23:00:39 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57768597.2070606@rock-chips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1467379291-18413-1-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Hi Marc,
On 2016年07月01日 21:21, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On a big-little system, PMUs can be wired to CPUs using per CPU
> interrups (PPI). In this case, it is important to make sure that
> the enable/disable do happen on the right set of CPUs.
>
> So instead of relying on the interrupt-affinity property, we can
> use the actual percpu affinity that DT exposes as part of the
> interrupt specifier. The DT binding is also updated to reflect
> the fact that the interrupt-affinity property shouldn't be used
> in that case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Tested-by: Caesar Wang <wxt@rock-chips.com>
I pick this up on my local branch.
8bc671a FROMLIST: drivers/perf: arm-pmu: Handle per-interrupt affinity mask
3d723f4 FROMLIST: arm64: dts: rockchip: support the pmu node for rk3399
1359b92 FIXUP: FROMLIST: arm64: dts: rockchip: change all interrupts
cells for 4 on rk3399 SoCs
...
Tested on rk3399 board.
localhost / # perf list
List of pre-defined events (to be used in -e):
cpu-cycles OR cycles [Hardware event]
instructions [Hardware event]
cache-references [Hardware event]
cache-misses [Hardware event]
branch-instructions OR branches [Hardware event]
branch-misses [Hardware event]
bus-cycles [Hardware event]
...
perf stat --cpu 0/1/2/3..... to minitor
e.g. cpu0;
localhost / # perf stat --cpu 0
^C
Performance counter stats for 'CPU(s) 0':
3374.917571 task-clock (msec) # 1.001 CPUs utilized [100.00%]
20 context-switches # 0.006 K/sec [100.00%]
2 cpu-migrations # 0.001 K/sec [100.00%]
55 page-faults # 0.016 K/sec
7151843 cycles # 0.002 GHz [100.00%]
<not supported> stalled-cycles-frontend
<not supported> stalled-cycles-backend
4272536 instructions # 0.60 insns per cycle [100.00%]
568406 branches # 0.168 M/sec [100.00%]
65652 branch-misses # 11.55% of all branches
Also, 'perf top' to monitor the PMU interrupts from cpus
---
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/pmu.txt | 4 +++-
> drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++-----
> 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/pmu.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/pmu.txt
> index 74d5417..61c8b46 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/pmu.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/pmu.txt
> @@ -39,7 +39,9 @@ Optional properties:
> When using a PPI, specifies a list of phandles to CPU
> nodes corresponding to the set of CPUs which have
> a PMU of this type signalling the PPI listed in the
> - interrupts property.
> + interrupts property, unless this is already specified
> + by the PPI interrupt specifier itself (in which case
> + the interrupt-affinity property shouldn't be present).
>
> This property should be present when there is more than
> a single SPI.
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
> index 140436a..065ccec 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
> @@ -603,7 +603,8 @@ static void cpu_pmu_free_irq(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
>
> irq = platform_get_irq(pmu_device, 0);
> if (irq >= 0 && irq_is_percpu(irq)) {
> - on_each_cpu(cpu_pmu_disable_percpu_irq, &irq, 1);
> + on_each_cpu_mask(&cpu_pmu->supported_cpus,
> + cpu_pmu_disable_percpu_irq, &irq, 1);
> free_percpu_irq(irq, &hw_events->percpu_pmu);
> } else {
> for (i = 0; i < irqs; ++i) {
> @@ -645,7 +646,9 @@ static int cpu_pmu_request_irq(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu, irq_handler_t handler)
> irq);
> return err;
> }
> - on_each_cpu(cpu_pmu_enable_percpu_irq, &irq, 1);
> +
> + on_each_cpu_mask(&cpu_pmu->supported_cpus,
> + cpu_pmu_enable_percpu_irq, &irq, 1);
> } else {
> for (i = 0; i < irqs; ++i) {
> int cpu = i;
> @@ -961,9 +964,18 @@ static int of_pmu_irq_cfg(struct arm_pmu *pmu)
> i++;
> } while (1);
>
> - /* If we didn't manage to parse anything, claim to support all CPUs */
> - if (cpumask_weight(&pmu->supported_cpus) == 0)
> - cpumask_setall(&pmu->supported_cpus);
> + /* If we didn't manage to parse anything, try the interrupt affinity */
> + if (cpumask_weight(&pmu->supported_cpus) == 0) {
> + if (!using_spi) {
> + /* If using PPIs, check the affinity of the partition */
> + int irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> + irq_get_percpu_devid_partition(irq,
> + &pmu->supported_cpus);
> + } else {
> + /* Otherwise default to all CPUs */
> + cpumask_setall(&pmu->supported_cpus);
> + }
> + }
>
> /* If we matched up the IRQ affinities, use them to route the SPIs */
> if (using_spi && i == pdev->num_resources)
--
caesar wang | software engineer | wxt@rock-chip.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-01 15:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-01 13:21 [PATCH] drivers/perf: arm-pmu: Handle per-interrupt affinity mask Marc Zyngier
2016-07-01 15:00 ` Caesar Wang [this message]
2016-07-05 14:23 ` Rob Herring
[not found] ` <1467379291-18413-1-git-send-email-marc.zyngier-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2016-07-06 10:39 ` Will Deacon
2016-07-06 14:11 ` Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57768597.2070606@rock-chips.com \
--to=wxt@rock-chips.com \
--cc=briannorris@chromium.org \
--cc=cf@rock-chips.com \
--cc=david.wu@rock-chips.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=huangtao@rock-chips.com \
--cc=jay.xu@rock-chips.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).