* [RFC PATCH] dt/bindings: Add bindings for JC-42.4 compatible temperature sensors
@ 2016-07-02 17:05 Guenter Roeck
[not found] ` <1467479142-8249-1-git-send-email-linux-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2016-07-02 17:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rob Herring; +Cc: Mark Rutland, devicetree, linux-kernel, Guenter Roeck
Provide generic bindings for all Jedec JC-42.4 compatible temperature
sensor chips.
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
---
RFC to address:
- Is "jc-42-4" ok to use for JC-42.4 ?
- JC42.4 really specifies an SPD EEPROM with included temperature sensor.
Is "jedec,jc42-4" appropriate, or should it rather be something like
"jedec,jc-42-4-sensor" ?
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/jc42.txt | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 42 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/jc42.txt
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/jc42.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/jc42.txt
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..2bd604a93430
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/jc42.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+Properties for Jedec JC-42.4 compatible temperature sensors
+
+Required properties:
+- compatible: May include a device-specific string consisting of the
+ manufacturer and the name of the chip. A list of supported
+ chip names follows.
+ Must include "jedec,jc-42-4" for any Jedec JC-42.4 compatible
+ temperature sensor.
+
+ Supported chip names:
+ adt7408
+ at30ts00
+ at30tse004
+ cat6095
+ cat34ts02
+ max6604
+ mcp9804
+ mcp9805
+ mcp9808
+ mcp98243
+ mcp98244
+ mcp9843
+ se97
+ se98
+ stts2002
+ stts2004
+ stts3000
+ stts424
+ stts424e
+ tse2002
+ tse2004
+ ts3000
+ ts3001
+
+- reg: I2C address
+
+Example:
+
+temp-sensor@1a {
+ compatible = "jedec,jc-42-4";
+ reg = <0x18>;
+};
--
2.5.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread[parent not found: <1467479142-8249-1-git-send-email-linux-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [RFC PATCH] dt/bindings: Add bindings for JC-42.4 compatible temperature sensors [not found] ` <1467479142-8249-1-git-send-email-linux-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org> @ 2016-07-05 15:48 ` Rob Herring 2016-07-05 16:30 ` Guenter Roeck 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Rob Herring @ 2016-07-05 15:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Guenter Roeck Cc: Mark Rutland, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA On Sat, Jul 02, 2016 at 10:05:42AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > Provide generic bindings for all Jedec JC-42.4 compatible temperature > sensor chips. > > Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org> > --- > RFC to address: > - Is "jc-42-4" ok to use for JC-42.4 ? > - JC42.4 really specifies an SPD EEPROM with included temperature sensor. That would be at a different address? > Is "jedec,jc42-4" appropriate, or should it rather be something like > "jedec,jc-42-4-sensor" ? If yes, then probably the latter. Though I would do "temp" rather than "sensor". Also, "-42.4" is fine. > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/jc42.txt | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/jc42.txt > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/jc42.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/jc42.txt > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..2bd604a93430 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/jc42.txt > @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@ > +Properties for Jedec JC-42.4 compatible temperature sensors > + > +Required properties: > +- compatible: May include a device-specific string consisting of the > + manufacturer and the name of the chip. A list of supported > + chip names follows. > + Must include "jedec,jc-42-4" for any Jedec JC-42.4 compatible > + temperature sensor. > + > + Supported chip names: > + adt7408 > + at30ts00 > + at30tse004 > + cat6095 > + cat34ts02 > + max6604 > + mcp9804 > + mcp9805 > + mcp9808 > + mcp98243 > + mcp98244 > + mcp9843 > + se97 > + se98 > + stts2002 > + stts2004 > + stts3000 > + stts424 > + stts424e > + tse2002 > + tse2004 > + ts3000 > + ts3001 These are all vendor independent names? > + > +- reg: I2C address > + > +Example: > + > +temp-sensor@1a { > + compatible = "jedec,jc-42-4"; > + reg = <0x18>; > +}; > -- > 2.5.0 > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC PATCH] dt/bindings: Add bindings for JC-42.4 compatible temperature sensors 2016-07-05 15:48 ` Rob Herring @ 2016-07-05 16:30 ` Guenter Roeck 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Guenter Roeck @ 2016-07-05 16:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rob Herring Cc: Mark Rutland, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA On 07/05/2016 08:48 AM, Rob Herring wrote: > On Sat, Jul 02, 2016 at 10:05:42AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: >> Provide generic bindings for all Jedec JC-42.4 compatible temperature >> sensor chips. >> >> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org> >> --- >> RFC to address: >> - Is "jc-42-4" ok to use for JC-42.4 ? >> - JC42.4 really specifies an SPD EEPROM with included temperature sensor. > > That would be at a different address? > Yes. The EEPROM is at address 0x5[0-7], the temperature sensor is at 0x1[8-f]. >> Is "jedec,jc42-4" appropriate, or should it rather be something like >> "jedec,jc-42-4-sensor" ? > > If yes, then probably the latter. Though I would do "temp" rather than > "sensor". > > Also, "-42.4" is fine. > Ok, I'll use "jedec,jc-42.4-temp". >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/jc42.txt | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/jc42.txt >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/jc42.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/jc42.txt >> new file mode 100644 >> index 000000000000..2bd604a93430 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/jc42.txt >> @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@ >> +Properties for Jedec JC-42.4 compatible temperature sensors >> + >> +Required properties: >> +- compatible: May include a device-specific string consisting of the >> + manufacturer and the name of the chip. A list of supported >> + chip names follows. >> + Must include "jedec,jc-42-4" for any Jedec JC-42.4 compatible >> + temperature sensor. >> + >> + Supported chip names: >> + adt7408 >> + at30ts00 >> + at30tse004 >> + cat6095 >> + cat34ts02 >> + max6604 >> + mcp9804 >> + mcp9805 >> + mcp9808 >> + mcp98243 >> + mcp98244 >> + mcp9843 >> + se97 >> + se98 >> + stts2002 >> + stts2004 >> + stts3000 >> + stts424 >> + stts424e >> + tse2002 >> + tse2004 >> + ts3000 >> + ts3001 > > These are all vendor independent names? > No. se97/se98 would be NXP, for example. I'll add the vendor prefixes. Thanks, Guenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-07-05 16:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-07-02 17:05 [RFC PATCH] dt/bindings: Add bindings for JC-42.4 compatible temperature sensors Guenter Roeck
[not found] ` <1467479142-8249-1-git-send-email-linux-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
2016-07-05 15:48 ` Rob Herring
2016-07-05 16:30 ` Guenter Roeck
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).