Re: [PATCH] [v7] net: emac: emac gigabit ethernet controller driver

[Timur Tabi <timur-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>]

Timur Tabi wrote:
> I used to work on PowerPC, so I respect making things work for both
> endians.  However, even I think that this is overkill for my driver.
> First, there's no way this driver will ever be used on a big-endian
> system.  Second, I'm pretty sure there are lots of places that would
> need cpu_to_le32() in order to make this driver big-endian compatible.
> It would be a huge mess.
>
> #define TPD_BUFFER_ADDR_H_SET(tpd, val)    BITS_SET((tpd)->word[3], 18,
> 30, val)
>
> This macros sets specific bits based on the definition of the register.
>   I could change it to this:
>
> #define TPD_BUFFER_ADDR_H_SET(tpd, val) BITS_SET((tpd)->word[3], 18, 30,
> cpu_to_le32(val))
>
> But I honestly don't see what good that will do.  There are still
> thousands of other places that assume little-endian.

Ok, so I took another look at this, and even though I still think that 
it's useless, it seems to be much less difficult to implement than I 
initially thought.

I think all I need to do is to modify the BITS_GET() and BITS_SET() 
macros in emac-mac.h, as well as any of the RRD_xxx and TPD_xxx macros 
that do not use BITS_GET() or BITS_SET().  This is a minor change which 
I will implement in v8 of the patch.

Every other hardware access uses readl/writel, which is already endian-safe.

-- 
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm
Technologies, Inc.  Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html