From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joshua Clayton Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 6/6] ARM: dts: imx6qdl-udoo.dtsi: fix onboard USB HUB property Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2016 16:33:35 -0700 Message-ID: <57AA684F.4020004@gmail.com> References: <1470646331-23227-1-git-send-email-peter.chen@nxp.com> <1470646331-23227-7-git-send-email-peter.chen@nxp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1470646331-23227-7-git-send-email-peter.chen@nxp.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Peter Chen , gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, stern@rowland.harvard.edu, ulf.hansson@linaro.org, broonie@kernel.org, sre@kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, shawnguo@kernel.org, dbaryshkov@gmail.com, dwmw3@infradead.org Cc: k.kozlowski@samsung.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, p.zabel@pengutronix.de, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, pawel.moll@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, s.hauer@pengutronix.de, mail@maciej.szmigiero.name, troy.kisky@boundarydevices.com, festevam@gmail.com, oscar@naiandei.net, stephen.boyd@linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mka@chromium.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Peter, On 08/08/2016 01:52 AM, Peter Chen wrote: > The current dts describes USB HUB's property at USB controller's > entry, it is improper. The USB HUB should be the child node > under USB controller, and power sequence properties are under > it. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Chen > --- > arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl-udoo.dtsi | 26 +++++++++++++------------- > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl-udoo.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl-udoo.dtsi > index 3bee2f9..f29a72c2f 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl-udoo.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl-udoo.dtsi > @@ -9,6 +9,8 @@ > * > */ > > +#include > + > / { > aliases { > backlight = &backlight; > @@ -58,17 +60,6 @@ > #address-cells = <1>; > #size-cells = <0>; > > - reg_usb_h1_vbus: regulator@0 { > - compatible = "regulator-fixed"; > - reg = <0>; > - regulator-name = "usb_h1_vbus"; > - regulator-min-microvolt = <5000000>; > - regulator-max-microvolt = <5000000>; > - enable-active-high; > - startup-delay-us = <2>; /* USB2415 requires a POR of 1 us minimum */ > - gpio = <&gpio7 12 0>; > - }; > - > reg_panel: regulator@1 { > compatible = "regulator-fixed"; > reg = <1>; > @@ -259,9 +250,18 @@ > &usbh1 { > pinctrl-names = "default"; > pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_usbh>; > - vbus-supply = <®_usb_h1_vbus>; > - clocks = <&clks IMX6QDL_CLK_CKO>; > status = "okay"; > + > + #address-cells = <1>; > + #size-cells = <0>; Assuming they are needed, #address-cells and #size-cells should go in imx6qdl.dtsi, rather than in board dts files, shouldn't they? > + usb2415: hub@1 { > + compatible = "usb424,2514"; > + reg = <1>; Does have any effect? I couldn't find any reference to it in the patches. (so apologies if it is in core code) Does it matter? Would it be possible to connect more than one hub to the same usb phy? > + > + clocks = <&clks IMX6QDL_CLK_CKO>; > + reset-gpios = <&gpio7 12 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>; > + reset-duration-us = <3000>; > + }; > }; > > &usdhc3 {