From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch (vps0.lunn.ch [156.67.10.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C056544E021; Thu, 2 Jul 2026 13:22:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=156.67.10.101 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782998560; cv=none; b=THBPeI0CKHsWUhwLcFh8D7ALcFyD4XC0AIrBHdX01/eTYEIqutiR5OFJHSibbBVVZysvIZoT+jW/CDl2C1ei2E2U4GhbDpwF9Jg1k4/cHMWV2HGNIF6mamkZco14WaLEa6+DnvgHE1azPVAXIrb7dFzRDjpvvp6XvtL3hwTM3Ok= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782998560; c=relaxed/simple; bh=zR2ssBTJ0hc8qe+ldHpvUptRAIZg+VWONUgR5PKlGfY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=W9aQWTkEY/k68AcAeoHI9J4CvYeevr1y4qox5KVjr/AtjoZ4AQTQMSFhlIyhZAToOuhxeOxtD2awr/0PdCdAfpa6WHtydmzMjRAk0/F5sLKJ6Ux4+iWRGm1KwDSn7SX7VHes9luQSTqUYupeaNC8flHYnTr4SzstuG8q0CIdpso= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lunn.ch; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lunn.ch; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@lunn.ch header.b=zbKFCrLI; arc=none smtp.client-ip=156.67.10.101 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lunn.ch Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lunn.ch Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@lunn.ch header.b="zbKFCrLI" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lunn.ch; s=20171124; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Disposition:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject: Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:References; bh=tWlnBBIqu+jwhvkKN/N5JYkj1UlSldgA+HsxEGOrqnM=; b=zbKFCrLI1i8pQY9ZY7jVNYvcYe RDv8omyGh7Ow2IczFdscKKXjBPx2kY8e/hioXEUYEofi0EzIBJOZD0pI2iMXWY3guOv1Gb80lOzNS Vyjh7E16J3p2Qu0syeu8I4sXQscmfKYfcdETJhkJMErFiQi54pNekZnWDWbbGcprOqQ0=; Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1wfHNC-00ANLw-SO; Thu, 02 Jul 2026 15:22:34 +0200 Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2026 15:22:34 +0200 From: Andrew Lunn To: =?utf-8?B?5p2O5b+X?= Cc: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev, conor+dt@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Min Lin Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH net-next v9 6/6] riscv: dts: eswin: eic7700-hifive-premier-p550: enable Ethernet controller Message-ID: <58532b95-bb74-4d87-acae-e67b41dd7d57@lunn.ch> References: <20260630063123.1118-1-lizhi2@eswincomputing.com> <20260630063445.1226-1-lizhi2@eswincomputing.com> <20260701063512.9ED051F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> <5de09a24.a11e.19f2207d7d2.Coremail.lizhi2@eswincomputing.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5de09a24.a11e.19f2207d7d2.Coremail.lizhi2@eswincomputing.com> > Hi Andrew, > > One question before I prepare the next revision. > > As discussed previously, the DTS patch was included only to provide the overall > Ethernet design context during the review of the binding and driver patches: > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/64bf6b40-b947-4ffa-8d48-4d6341931327@lunn.ch/ > > For the next revision, would it be acceptable to drop the DTS patch from this > series and post only the binding and driver patches? The complete DTS > enablement is planned to be submitted later as a separate series after the > binding and driver have been merged. What normally happens is that I give an Acked-by: or a Reviewed-by: for the DT patch, and you submit it for merging via the DT Maintainer. Everything then meets up in linux-next. Why do you need to do this later? Why not now? Andrew