From: jeffy <jeffy.chen-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
toshi.kani-ZPxbGqLxI0U@public.gmane.org,
Shawn Lin <shawn.lin-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org>,
Brian Norris
<briannorris-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>,
Doug Anderson <dianders-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>,
"bhelgaas-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org"
<bhelgaas-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dtor-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>,
Frank Rowand
<frowand.list-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
"devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] of/pci: Fix memory leak in of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 16:22:19 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <58D385BB.8010502@rock-chips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL_JsqLiZB2cQ1h+hFdRm4HXvi9WRL6HsUDvW8SxqjwVndbTxg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
Hi Rob,
On 03/22/2017 10:55 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 9:39 AM, Rob Herring <robh-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 9:25 PM, Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>>> Currently we only free the allocated resource struct when error.
>>> This would cause memory leak after pci_free_resource_list.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> drivers/of/of_pci.c | 48 +++++++++++++++---------------------------------
>>> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/of/of_pci.c b/drivers/of/of_pci.c
>>> index 0ee42c3..269393bc 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/of/of_pci.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/of/of_pci.c
>>> @@ -189,9 +189,7 @@ int of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources(struct device_node *dev,
>>> unsigned char busno, unsigned char bus_max,
>>> struct list_head *resources, resource_size_t *io_base)
>>> {
>>> - struct resource_entry *window;
>>> - struct resource *res;
>>> - struct resource *bus_range;
>>> + struct resource res;
>>> struct of_pci_range range;
>>> struct of_pci_range_parser parser;
>>> char range_type[4];
>>> @@ -200,24 +198,19 @@ int of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources(struct device_node *dev,
>>> if (io_base)
>>> *io_base = (resource_size_t)OF_BAD_ADDR;
>>>
>>> - bus_range = kzalloc(sizeof(*bus_range), GFP_KERNEL);
>>> - if (!bus_range)
>>> - return -ENOMEM;
>>> -
>>> pr_info("host bridge %s ranges:\n", dev->full_name);
>>>
>>> - err = of_pci_parse_bus_range(dev, bus_range);
>>> + err = of_pci_parse_bus_range(dev, &res);
>>> if (err) {
>>> - bus_range->start = busno;
>>> - bus_range->end = bus_max;
>>> - bus_range->flags = IORESOURCE_BUS;
>>> - pr_info(" No bus range found for %s, using %pR\n",
>>> - dev->full_name, bus_range);
>>> + res.start = busno;
>>> + res.end = bus_max;
>>> + res.flags = IORESOURCE_BUS;
>>> + pr_info(" No bus range found for %s\n", dev->full_name);
>>> } else {
>>> - if (bus_range->end > bus_range->start + bus_max)
>>> - bus_range->end = bus_range->start + bus_max;
>>> + if (res.end > res.start + bus_max)
>>> + res.end = res.start + bus_max;
>>> }
>>> - pci_add_resource(resources, bus_range);
>>> + pci_add_resource(resources, &res);
>>
>> You are passing a stack variable to pci_add_resource and it doesn't
>> make a copy of it. I assume the resource needs to live after you exit
>> this function.
>
> Ah, found your 1st patch changing the behavior. I'm surprised that
> change works without affecting anyone else.
sorry, i should add a cover-letter first. and you're right, that would
affect others(for example the ioport_resource/iomem_resource).
>
>> If we have a leak, can't you just add a free in the correct spot? That
>> would be a lot easier to review.
it seems hard to tell which resources in the list need to be freed after
all...
>>
>> Rob
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-23 8:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1490149546-4062-1-git-send-email-jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>
2017-03-22 2:25 ` [PATCH 2/2] of/pci: Fix memory leak in of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources Jeffy Chen
[not found] ` <1490149546-4062-2-git-send-email-jeffy.chen-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org>
2017-03-22 14:39 ` Rob Herring
[not found] ` <CAL_JsqL7eqJCKhsGuCtqoCXW=KpXrjka+4ZX4VCYDyFFY5RYFg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2017-03-22 14:55 ` Rob Herring
[not found] ` <CAL_JsqLiZB2cQ1h+hFdRm4HXvi9WRL6HsUDvW8SxqjwVndbTxg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2017-03-23 8:22 ` jeffy [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=58D385BB.8010502@rock-chips.com \
--to=jeffy.chen-tnx95d0mmh7dzftrwevzcw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=bhelgaas-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=briannorris-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=dianders-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=dtor-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=frowand.list-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=robh-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=shawn.lin-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=toshi.kani-ZPxbGqLxI0U@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).