Re: [PATCH] of: introduce event tracepoints for dynamic device_node lifecyle

[Frank Rowand <frowand.list-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>]

On 04/19/17 21:43, Frank Rowand wrote:
> On 04/19/17 16:27, Tyrel Datwyler wrote:
>> On 04/18/2017 06:31 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:

< snip >

>>
>> To get that same info as far as I know is to add a dump_stack() after
>> each pr_debug.
> 
> Here is a patch that I have used.  It is not as user friendly in terms
> of human readable stack traces (though a very small user space program
> should be able to fix that).  The patch is cut and pasted into this
> email, so probably white space damaged.

< snip >

> +
> +	if (node) {
> +		int k;
> +		int refcount = refcount_read(&node->kobj.kref.refcount);
> +		pr_err("XXX get 0x%p %3d [0x%08lx 0x%08lx 0x%08lx 0x%08lx 0x%08lx 0x%08lx] ",
> +			node, refcount,

If this was a real patch, meant for people other than myself, the
pr_err() would instead be pr_debug().

-Frank

< snip >
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html