From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jeffy Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] spi: rockchip: add support for "cs-gpios" dts property Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 17:12:24 +0800 Message-ID: <593E5AF8.1080404@rock-chips.com> References: <1497248057-16550-1-git-send-email-jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com> <593E501F.5060906@rock-chips.com> <4418523.E0t9k04HOG@diego> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4418523.E0t9k04HOG@diego> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: =?UTF-8?B?SGVpa28gU3TDvGJuZXI=?= Cc: Shawn Lin , linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, broonie-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, Mark Rutland , devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, briannorris-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org, dianders-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org, linux-spi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-rockchip-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, Rob Herring , linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Heiko, thanx for your comments. On 06/12/2017 04:36 PM, Heiko Stübner wrote: > Am Montag, 12. Juni 2017, 16:26:07 CEST schrieb jeffy: >> Hi Shawn, >> >> On 06/12/2017 03:15 PM, Shawn Lin wrote: >>> Hi Jeffy, >>> >>> On 2017/6/12 14:14, Jeffy Chen wrote: >>>> Support using "cs-gpios" property to specify cs gpios. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Jeffy Chen >>>> --- >>>> >>>> .../devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-rockchip.txt | 2 + >>>> drivers/spi/spi-rockchip.c | 52 >>>> >>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>> >>>> 2 files changed, 54 insertions(+) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-rockchip.txt >>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-rockchip.txt >>>> index 83da493..02171b2 100644 >>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-rockchip.txt >>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-rockchip.txt >>> >>> The changes for doc should be another patch, and... >> >> but i saw others didn't separate them: >> cf9e478 spi: sh-msiof: Add slave mode support >> 23e291c spi: rockchip: support "sleep" pin configuration > > it sometimes falls through the cracks, but having dt-binding patches > separate is meant to make it easier on DT-Maintainers to find > patches they need to look at. ok, will do. > > >>>> + if (!data->cs_gpio_requested) { >>>> + ret = gpio_request_one(spi->cs_gpio, flags, >>>> + dev_name(&spi->dev)); >>>> + if (!ret) >>>> + data->cs_gpio_requested = 1; >>>> + } else >>>> + ret = gpio_direction_output(spi->cs_gpio, flags); >>> >>> need brace around 'else' statement. Also I don't see data used >>> elsewhere, so you need these code above. >> >> ok. >> and the cs_gpio_requested is to mark cs_gpio requested, because the >> setup func might be called multiple times, we only need to request gpio >> at the first time. > > Aren't the gpiod* functions meant to be used for new things? > Also you might actually do a bit of error handling there, especially > EPROBE_DEFER. so you are suggesting to use gpiod* functions here to replace gpio_* functions right? > > > Heiko > > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html