From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jiada Wang Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next v4 2/4] spi: imx: add selection for iMX53 and iMX6 controller Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 18:25:52 -0700 Message-ID: <5951B420.9080400@mentor.com> References: <20170608051603.16070-1-jiada_wang@mentor.com> <20170608051603.16070-3-jiada_wang@mentor.com> <20170612155345.qtgaq4wjj2vidohd@rob-hp-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-spi-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Rob Herring Cc: Mark Brown , Mark Rutland , Shawn Guo , "kernel-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org" , Fabio Estevam , "linux-spi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hello Mark and Sascha Could you please review my v4 patch set for i.MX SPI slave support Thanks, Jiada On 06/13/2017 07:29 AM, Rob Herring wrote: > On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 12:28 AM, Jiada Wang wrote: >> Hello Rob >> >> >> On 06/13/2017 12:53 AM, Rob Herring wrote: >>> On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 02:16:01PM +0900, Jiada Wang wrote: >>>> ECSPI contorller for iMX53 and iMX6 has few hardware issues >>>> comparing to iMX51. >>>> The change add possibility to detect which controller is used >>>> to apply possible workaround and limitations. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Jiada Wang >>>> --- >>>> .../devicetree/bindings/spi/fsl-imx-cspi.txt | 1 + >>>> drivers/spi/spi-imx.c | 26 >>>> ++++++++++++++++++++-- >>>> 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/fsl-imx-cspi.txt >>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/fsl-imx-cspi.txt >>>> index 31b5b21..5bf1396 100644 >>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/fsl-imx-cspi.txt >>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/fsl-imx-cspi.txt >>>> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ Required properties: >>>> - "fsl,imx31-cspi" for SPI compatible with the one integrated on >>>> i.MX31 >>>> - "fsl,imx35-cspi" for SPI compatible with the one integrated on >>>> i.MX35 >>>> - "fsl,imx51-ecspi" for SPI compatible with the one integrated on >>>> i.MX51 >>>> + - "fsl,imx53-ecspi" for SPI compatible with the one integrated on >>>> i.MX53 and later Soc >>>> - reg : Offset and length of the register set for the device >>>> - interrupts : Should contain CSPI/eCSPI interrupt >>>> - cs-gpios : Specifies the gpio pins to be used for chipselects. >>>> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c >>>> index 4469121..8e6f339 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c >>>> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c >>>> @@ -63,7 +63,8 @@ enum spi_imx_devtype { >>>> IMX27_CSPI, >>>> IMX31_CSPI, >>>> IMX35_CSPI, /* CSPI on all i.mx except above */ >>>> - IMX51_ECSPI, /* ECSPI on i.mx51 and later */ >>>> + IMX51_ECSPI, /* ECSPI on i.mx51 */ >>>> + IMX53_ECSPI, /* ECSPI on i.mx53 and later */ >>> >>> Looks like i.MX51 and i.MX53 are the same. While the DT should have >>> different compatibles (with fallbacks), the driver should map them to >>> the same type until there's some difference found. >>> >> the difference between i.MX51 and i.MX53 is introduced in the >> 4th patch "spi: imx: Add support for SPI Slave mode" in this patch set > Okay, I missed that. > >> do you think, I need to merge the two patches into one? > No, not necessary. > > Acked-by: Rob Herring > > Rob -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html