From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Saravana Kannan Subject: Re: [v0 1/2] dt-bindings: clock: Introduce QCOM CPUFREQ FW bindings Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 12:17:01 -0700 Message-ID: <5AFDD52D.2000201@codeaurora.org> References: <1526549401-25666-1-git-send-email-tdas@codeaurora.org> <1526549401-25666-2-git-send-email-tdas@codeaurora.org> <20180517101438.du7xihojuhjxq77l@vireshk-i7> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20180517101438.du7xihojuhjxq77l@vireshk-i7> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Viresh Kumar Cc: Taniya Das , robh@kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Boyd , Rajendra Nayak , Amit Nischal , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, amit.kucheria@linaro.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 05/17/2018 03:14 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > + Rob. > > On 17-05-18, 15:00, Taniya Das wrote: >> Add QCOM cpufreq firmware device bindings for Qualcomm Technology Inc's >> SoCs. This is required for managing the cpu frequency transitions which are >> controlled by firmware. >> >> Signed-off-by: Taniya Das >> --- >> .../bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-qcom-fw.txt | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 68 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-qcom-fw.txt Isn't the prefix wrong? Shouldn't it be dt-bindings: cpufreq:? -Saravana -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project