[PATCH v3 0/4] soc: mediatek: MT8365 power support

[PATCH v3 0/4] soc: mediatek: MT8365 power support

[Markus Schneider-Pargmann]

Hi,

this series contains patches related to the support of mt8365 power
domains. Thanks for your feedback so far.

Best,
Markus

Changes in v3:
- Mainly redesigned WAY_EN patch to be easier to understand
- Rebased onto v6.0-rc1
- Several other stuff that is described in the individual patches

Changes in v2:
- Updated error handling path for scpsys_power_on()
- Minor updates described in each patch

Previous versions:
v1 - https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mediatek/20220530204214.913251-1-fparent@baylibre.com/
v2 - https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mediatek/20220725081853.1636444-1-msp@baylibre.com/

Alexandre Bailon (2):
  soc: mediatek: Add support of WAY_EN operations
  soc: mediatek: add support of MTK_SCPD_STRICT_BUSP cap

Fabien Parent (2):
  dt-bindings: power: Add MT8365 power domains
  soc: mediatek: pm-domains: Add support for MT8365

 .../power/mediatek,power-controller.yaml      |   2 +
 drivers/soc/mediatek/mt8365-pm-domains.h      | 147 +++++++++++++
 drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c         | 194 ++++++++++++++----
 drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h         |  29 ++-
 .../dt-bindings/power/mediatek,mt8365-power.h |  19 ++
 5 files changed, 346 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 drivers/soc/mediatek/mt8365-pm-domains.h
 create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/power/mediatek,mt8365-power.h

-- 
2.37.2

[PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: power: Add MT8365 power domains

[Markus Schneider-Pargmann]

From: Fabien Parent <fparent@baylibre.com>

Add power domains dt-bindings for MT8365.

Signed-off-by: Fabien Parent <fparent@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@baylibre.com>
---

Notes:
    Changes in v3:
    - Renamed mt8365-power.h to mediatek,mt8365-power.h
    
    Changes in v2:
    - Made include/dt-bindings/power/mt8365-power.h dual-license.

 .../power/mediatek,power-controller.yaml      |  2 ++
 .../dt-bindings/power/mediatek,mt8365-power.h | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/power/mediatek,mt8365-power.h

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/mediatek,power-controller.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/mediatek,power-controller.yaml
index b448101fac43..a8702706dae4 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/mediatek,power-controller.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/mediatek,power-controller.yaml
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ properties:
       - mediatek,mt8186-power-controller
       - mediatek,mt8192-power-controller
       - mediatek,mt8195-power-controller
+      - mediatek,mt8365-power-controller
 
   '#power-domain-cells':
     const: 1
@@ -69,6 +70,7 @@ patternProperties:
               "include/dt-bindings/power/mt8183-power.h" - for MT8183 type power domain.
               "include/dt-bindings/power/mt8192-power.h" - for MT8192 type power domain.
               "include/dt-bindings/power/mt8195-power.h" - for MT8195 type power domain.
+              "include/dt-bindings/power/mediatek,mt8365-power.h" - for MT8365 type power domain.
         maxItems: 1
 
       clocks:
diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/power/mediatek,mt8365-power.h b/include/dt-bindings/power/mediatek,mt8365-power.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..e6cfd0ec7871
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/dt-bindings/power/mediatek,mt8365-power.h
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR MIT) */
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2022 MediaTek Inc.
+ */
+
+#ifndef _DT_BINDINGS_POWER_MT8365_POWER_H
+#define _DT_BINDINGS_POWER_MT8365_POWER_H
+
+#define MT8365_POWER_DOMAIN_MM		0
+#define MT8365_POWER_DOMAIN_CONN	1
+#define MT8365_POWER_DOMAIN_MFG		2
+#define MT8365_POWER_DOMAIN_AUDIO	3
+#define MT8365_POWER_DOMAIN_CAM		4
+#define MT8365_POWER_DOMAIN_DSP		5
+#define MT8365_POWER_DOMAIN_VDEC	6
+#define MT8365_POWER_DOMAIN_VENC	7
+#define MT8365_POWER_DOMAIN_APU		8
+
+#endif /* _DT_BINDINGS_POWER_MT8365_POWER_H */
-- 
2.37.2

Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: power: Add MT8365 power domains

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 22/08/2022 17:43, Markus Schneider-Pargmann wrote:
> From: Fabien Parent <fparent@baylibre.com>
> 
> Add power domains dt-bindings for MT8365.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fabien Parent <fparent@baylibre.com>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@baylibre.com>


Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>


Best regards,
Krzysztof

[PATCH v3 2/4] soc: mediatek: Add support of WAY_EN operations

[Markus Schneider-Pargmann]

From: Alexandre Bailon <abailon@baylibre.com>

This updates the power domain to support WAY_EN operations. These
operations enable a path between different units of the chip and are
labeled as 'way_en' in the register descriptions.

This operation is required by the mt8365 for the MM power domain.

Signed-off-by: Alexandre Bailon <abailon@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Fabien Parent <fparent@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@baylibre.com>
---

Notes:
    Changes in v3:
    - Separated the way_en functions for clarity
    - Added some checks for infracfg_nao
    
    Changes in v2:
    - some minor style fixes.
    - Renamed 'wayen' to 'way_en' to clarify the meaning
    - Updated commit message

 drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c | 162 +++++++++++++++++++++-----
 drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h |  28 +++--
 2 files changed, 149 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c
index 9734f1091c69..c2cbe0de6aa1 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c
@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ struct scpsys_domain {
 	struct clk_bulk_data *clks;
 	int num_subsys_clks;
 	struct clk_bulk_data *subsys_clks;
+	struct regmap *infracfg_nao;
 	struct regmap *infracfg;
 	struct regmap *smi;
 	struct regulator *supply;
@@ -117,26 +118,61 @@ static int scpsys_sram_disable(struct scpsys_domain *pd)
 					MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT);
 }
 
-static int _scpsys_bus_protect_enable(const struct scpsys_bus_prot_data *bpd, struct regmap *regmap)
+static int __scpsys_bus_protect_enable(const struct scpsys_bus_prot_data *bpd,
+				       struct regmap *regmap)
+{
+	u32 val;
+	u32 mask = bpd->bus_prot_mask;
+	u32 sta_mask = bpd->bus_prot_sta_mask;
+
+	if (bpd->bus_prot_reg_update)
+		regmap_set_bits(regmap, bpd->bus_prot_set, mask);
+	else
+		regmap_write(regmap, bpd->bus_prot_set, mask);
+
+	return regmap_read_poll_timeout(regmap, bpd->bus_prot_sta, val,
+					(val & sta_mask) == sta_mask,
+					MTK_POLL_DELAY_US, MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT);
+}
+
+static int scpsys_bus_way_disable(const struct scpsys_bus_prot_data *bpd,
+				  struct regmap *regmap,
+				  struct regmap *ack_regmap)
+{
+	u32 val;
+	u32 mask = bpd->bus_prot_mask;
+	u32 sta_mask = bpd->bus_prot_sta_mask;
+
+	if (bpd->bus_prot_reg_update)
+		regmap_clear_bits(regmap, bpd->bus_prot_set, mask);
+	else
+		regmap_write(regmap, bpd->bus_prot_set, mask);
+
+	if (bpd->ignore_clr_ack)
+		return 0;
+
+	return regmap_read_poll_timeout(ack_regmap, bpd->bus_prot_sta, val,
+					(val & sta_mask) == sta_mask,
+					MTK_POLL_DELAY_US, MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT);
+}
+
+static int _scpsys_bus_protect_enable(const struct scpsys_bus_prot_data *bpd,
+				      struct regmap *regmap, struct regmap *infracfg_nao)
 {
 	int i, ret;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < SPM_MAX_BUS_PROT_DATA; i++) {
-		u32 val, mask = bpd[i].bus_prot_mask;
-
-		if (!mask)
+		if (!bpd[i].bus_prot_mask)
 			break;
 
-		if (bpd[i].bus_prot_reg_update)
-			regmap_set_bits(regmap, bpd[i].bus_prot_set, mask);
+		if (bpd[i].way_en)
+			ret = scpsys_bus_way_disable(&bpd[i], regmap, infracfg_nao);
 		else
-			regmap_write(regmap, bpd[i].bus_prot_set, mask);
-
-		ret = regmap_read_poll_timeout(regmap, bpd[i].bus_prot_sta,
-					       val, (val & mask) == mask,
-					       MTK_POLL_DELAY_US, MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT);
-		if (ret)
+			ret = __scpsys_bus_protect_enable(&bpd[i], regmap);
+		if (ret) {
+			pr_err("%s %d %d\n", __PRETTY_FUNCTION__, __LINE__, ret);
 			return ret;
+		}
 	}
 
 	return 0;
@@ -146,37 +182,71 @@ static int scpsys_bus_protect_enable(struct scpsys_domain *pd)
 {
 	int ret;
 
-	ret = _scpsys_bus_protect_enable(pd->data->bp_infracfg, pd->infracfg);
+	ret = _scpsys_bus_protect_enable(pd->data->bp_infracfg,
+					 pd->infracfg, pd->infracfg_nao);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-	return _scpsys_bus_protect_enable(pd->data->bp_smi, pd->smi);
+	return _scpsys_bus_protect_enable(pd->data->bp_smi, pd->smi, NULL);
+}
+
+static int __scpsys_bus_protect_disable(const struct scpsys_bus_prot_data *bpd,
+					struct regmap *regmap)
+{
+	u32 val;
+	u32 mask = bpd->bus_prot_mask;
+	u32 sta_mask = bpd->bus_prot_sta_mask;
+
+	if (bpd->bus_prot_reg_update)
+		regmap_clear_bits(regmap, bpd->bus_prot_clr, mask);
+	else
+		regmap_write(regmap, bpd->bus_prot_clr, mask);
+
+	if (bpd->ignore_clr_ack)
+		return 0;
+
+	return regmap_read_poll_timeout(regmap, bpd->bus_prot_sta, val,
+					!(val & sta_mask), MTK_POLL_DELAY_US,
+					MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT);
+}
+
+static int scpsys_bus_way_enable(const struct scpsys_bus_prot_data *bpd,
+				 struct regmap *regmap,
+				 struct regmap *ack_regmap)
+{
+	u32 val;
+	u32 mask = bpd->bus_prot_mask;
+	u32 sta_mask = bpd->bus_prot_sta_mask;
+
+	if (bpd->bus_prot_reg_update)
+		regmap_set_bits(regmap, bpd->bus_prot_clr, mask);
+	else
+		regmap_write(regmap, bpd->bus_prot_clr, mask);
+
+	return regmap_read_poll_timeout(ack_regmap, bpd->bus_prot_sta, val,
+					(val & sta_mask) == sta_mask,
+					MTK_POLL_DELAY_US, MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT);
 }
 
 static int _scpsys_bus_protect_disable(const struct scpsys_bus_prot_data *bpd,
-				       struct regmap *regmap)
+				       struct regmap *regmap,
+				       struct regmap *infracfg_nao)
 {
 	int i, ret;
 
 	for (i = SPM_MAX_BUS_PROT_DATA - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
-		u32 val, mask = bpd[i].bus_prot_mask;
-
-		if (!mask)
+		if (!bpd[i].bus_prot_mask)
 			continue;
 
-		if (bpd[i].bus_prot_reg_update)
-			regmap_clear_bits(regmap, bpd[i].bus_prot_clr, mask);
+		if (bpd[i].way_en)
+			ret = scpsys_bus_way_enable(&bpd[i], regmap,
+						    infracfg_nao);
 		else
-			regmap_write(regmap, bpd[i].bus_prot_clr, mask);
-
-		if (bpd[i].ignore_clr_ack)
-			continue;
-
-		ret = regmap_read_poll_timeout(regmap, bpd[i].bus_prot_sta,
-					       val, !(val & mask),
-					       MTK_POLL_DELAY_US, MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT);
-		if (ret)
+			ret = __scpsys_bus_protect_disable(&bpd[i], regmap);
+		if (ret) {
+			pr_err("%s %d %d\n", __PRETTY_FUNCTION__, __LINE__, ret);
 			return ret;
+		}
 	}
 
 	return 0;
@@ -186,11 +256,12 @@ static int scpsys_bus_protect_disable(struct scpsys_domain *pd)
 {
 	int ret;
 
-	ret = _scpsys_bus_protect_disable(pd->data->bp_smi, pd->smi);
+	ret = _scpsys_bus_protect_disable(pd->data->bp_smi, pd->smi, NULL);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-	return _scpsys_bus_protect_disable(pd->data->bp_infracfg, pd->infracfg);
+	return _scpsys_bus_protect_disable(pd->data->bp_infracfg,
+			pd->infracfg, pd->infracfg_nao);
 }
 
 static int scpsys_regulator_enable(struct regulator *supply)
@@ -294,6 +365,21 @@ static int scpsys_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static bool scpsys_bp_infracfg_has_way_en(const struct scpsys_bus_prot_data *bpd)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < SPM_MAX_BUS_PROT_DATA; i++) {
+		if (!bpd[i].bus_prot_mask)
+			break;
+
+		if (bpd[i].way_en)
+			return true;
+	}
+
+	return false;
+}
+
 static struct
 generic_pm_domain *scpsys_add_one_domain(struct scpsys *scpsys, struct device_node *node)
 {
@@ -364,6 +450,20 @@ generic_pm_domain *scpsys_add_one_domain(struct scpsys *scpsys, struct device_no
 			return ERR_CAST(pd->smi);
 	}
 
+	if (scpsys_bp_infracfg_has_way_en(pd->data->bp_smi)) {
+		dev_err(scpsys->dev, "bp_smi does not support WAY_EN\n");
+		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+	}
+
+	pd->infracfg_nao = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle_optional(
+		node, "mediatek,infracfg_nao");
+	if (IS_ERR(pd->infracfg_nao)) {
+		if (scpsys_bp_infracfg_has_way_en(pd->data->bp_infracfg))
+			return ERR_CAST(pd->infracfg_nao);
+
+		pd->infracfg_nao = NULL;
+	}
+
 	num_clks = of_clk_get_parent_count(node);
 	if (num_clks > 0) {
 		/* Calculate number of subsys_clks */
diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h
index 7d3c0c36316c..974c68a1d89c 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h
+++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h
@@ -41,23 +41,29 @@
 
 #define SPM_MAX_BUS_PROT_DATA		6
 
-#define _BUS_PROT(_mask, _set, _clr, _sta, _update, _ignore) {	\
-		.bus_prot_mask = (_mask),			\
-		.bus_prot_set = _set,				\
-		.bus_prot_clr = _clr,				\
-		.bus_prot_sta = _sta,				\
-		.bus_prot_reg_update = _update,			\
-		.ignore_clr_ack = _ignore,			\
+#define _BUS_PROT(_mask, _sta_mask, _set, _clr, _sta, _update, _ignore, _way_en) {	\
+		.bus_prot_mask = (_mask),				\
+		.bus_prot_set = _set,					\
+		.bus_prot_clr = _clr,					\
+		.bus_prot_sta = _sta,					\
+		.bus_prot_sta_mask = _sta_mask,				\
+		.bus_prot_reg_update = _update,				\
+		.ignore_clr_ack = _ignore,				\
+		.way_en = _way_en,					\
 	}
 
 #define BUS_PROT_WR(_mask, _set, _clr, _sta)			\
-		_BUS_PROT(_mask, _set, _clr, _sta, false, false)
+		_BUS_PROT(_mask, _mask, _set, _clr, _sta, false, false, false)
 
 #define BUS_PROT_WR_IGN(_mask, _set, _clr, _sta)		\
-		_BUS_PROT(_mask, _set, _clr, _sta, false, true)
+		_BUS_PROT(_mask, _mask, _set, _clr, _sta, false, true, false)
 
 #define BUS_PROT_UPDATE(_mask, _set, _clr, _sta)		\
-		_BUS_PROT(_mask, _set, _clr, _sta, true, false)
+		_BUS_PROT(_mask, _mask, _set, _clr, _sta, true, false, false)
+
+#define BUS_PROT_WAY_EN(_en_mask, _sta_mask, _set, _sta)	\
+		_BUS_PROT(_en_mask, _sta_mask, _set, _set, _sta, true, false, \
+			  true)
 
 #define BUS_PROT_UPDATE_TOPAXI(_mask)				\
 		BUS_PROT_UPDATE(_mask,				\
@@ -70,8 +76,10 @@ struct scpsys_bus_prot_data {
 	u32 bus_prot_set;
 	u32 bus_prot_clr;
 	u32 bus_prot_sta;
+	u32 bus_prot_sta_mask;
 	bool bus_prot_reg_update;
 	bool ignore_clr_ack;
+	bool way_en;
 };
 
 /**
-- 
2.37.2

Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] soc: mediatek: Add support of WAY_EN operations

[Matthias Brugger]

On 22/08/2022 16:43, Markus Schneider-Pargmann wrote:
> From: Alexandre Bailon <abailon@baylibre.com>
> 
> This updates the power domain to support WAY_EN operations. These
> operations enable a path between different units of the chip and are
> labeled as 'way_en' in the register descriptions.
> 
> This operation is required by the mt8365 for the MM power domain.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Bailon <abailon@baylibre.com>
> Signed-off-by: Fabien Parent <fparent@baylibre.com>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@baylibre.com>
> ---
> 
> Notes:
>      Changes in v3:
>      - Separated the way_en functions for clarity
>      - Added some checks for infracfg_nao
>      
>      Changes in v2:
>      - some minor style fixes.
>      - Renamed 'wayen' to 'way_en' to clarify the meaning
>      - Updated commit message
> 
>   drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c | 162 +++++++++++++++++++++-----
>   drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h |  28 +++--
>   2 files changed, 149 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c
> index 9734f1091c69..c2cbe0de6aa1 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c
> @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ struct scpsys_domain {
>   	struct clk_bulk_data *clks;
>   	int num_subsys_clks;
>   	struct clk_bulk_data *subsys_clks;
> +	struct regmap *infracfg_nao;
>   	struct regmap *infracfg;
>   	struct regmap *smi;
>   	struct regulator *supply;
> @@ -117,26 +118,61 @@ static int scpsys_sram_disable(struct scpsys_domain *pd)
>   					MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT);
>   }
>   
> -static int _scpsys_bus_protect_enable(const struct scpsys_bus_prot_data *bpd, struct regmap *regmap)
> +static int __scpsys_bus_protect_enable(const struct scpsys_bus_prot_data *bpd,
> +				       struct regmap *regmap)
> +{
> +	u32 val;
> +	u32 mask = bpd->bus_prot_mask;
> +	u32 sta_mask = bpd->bus_prot_sta_mask;
> +
> +	if (bpd->bus_prot_reg_update)
> +		regmap_set_bits(regmap, bpd->bus_prot_set, mask);
> +	else
> +		regmap_write(regmap, bpd->bus_prot_set, mask);
> +
> +	return regmap_read_poll_timeout(regmap, bpd->bus_prot_sta, val,
> +					(val & sta_mask) == sta_mask,
> +					MTK_POLL_DELAY_US, MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT);
> +}
> +
> +static int scpsys_bus_way_disable(const struct scpsys_bus_prot_data *bpd,
> +				  struct regmap *regmap,
> +				  struct regmap *ack_regmap)
> +{
> +	u32 val;
> +	u32 mask = bpd->bus_prot_mask;
> +	u32 sta_mask = bpd->bus_prot_sta_mask;
> +
> +	if (bpd->bus_prot_reg_update)
> +		regmap_clear_bits(regmap, bpd->bus_prot_set, mask);
> +	else
> +		regmap_write(regmap, bpd->bus_prot_set, mask);
> +
> +	if (bpd->ignore_clr_ack)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	return regmap_read_poll_timeout(ack_regmap, bpd->bus_prot_sta, val,
> +					(val & sta_mask) == sta_mask,
> +					MTK_POLL_DELAY_US, MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT);
> +}
> +
> +static int _scpsys_bus_protect_enable(const struct scpsys_bus_prot_data *bpd,
> +				      struct regmap *regmap, struct regmap *infracfg_nao)
>   {
>   	int i, ret;
>   
>   	for (i = 0; i < SPM_MAX_BUS_PROT_DATA; i++) {
> -		u32 val, mask = bpd[i].bus_prot_mask;
> -
> -		if (!mask)
> +		if (!bpd[i].bus_prot_mask)
>   			break;
>   
> -		if (bpd[i].bus_prot_reg_update)
> -			regmap_set_bits(regmap, bpd[i].bus_prot_set, mask);
> +		if (bpd[i].way_en)
> +			ret = scpsys_bus_way_disable(&bpd[i], regmap, infracfg_nao);
>   		else
> -			regmap_write(regmap, bpd[i].bus_prot_set, mask);
> -
> -		ret = regmap_read_poll_timeout(regmap, bpd[i].bus_prot_sta,
> -					       val, (val & mask) == mask,
> -					       MTK_POLL_DELAY_US, MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT);
> -		if (ret)
> +			ret = __scpsys_bus_protect_enable(&bpd[i], regmap);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			pr_err("%s %d %d\n", __PRETTY_FUNCTION__, __LINE__, ret);
>   			return ret;
> +		}
>   	}
>   
>   	return 0;
> @@ -146,37 +182,71 @@ static int scpsys_bus_protect_enable(struct scpsys_domain *pd)
>   {
>   	int ret;
>   
> -	ret = _scpsys_bus_protect_enable(pd->data->bp_infracfg, pd->infracfg);
> +	ret = _scpsys_bus_protect_enable(pd->data->bp_infracfg,
> +					 pd->infracfg, pd->infracfg_nao);
>   	if (ret)
>   		return ret;
>   
> -	return _scpsys_bus_protect_enable(pd->data->bp_smi, pd->smi);
> +	return _scpsys_bus_protect_enable(pd->data->bp_smi, pd->smi, NULL);
> +}
> +
> +static int __scpsys_bus_protect_disable(const struct scpsys_bus_prot_data *bpd,
> +					struct regmap *regmap)
> +{
> +	u32 val;
> +	u32 mask = bpd->bus_prot_mask;
> +	u32 sta_mask = bpd->bus_prot_sta_mask;
> +
> +	if (bpd->bus_prot_reg_update)
> +		regmap_clear_bits(regmap, bpd->bus_prot_clr, mask);
> +	else
> +		regmap_write(regmap, bpd->bus_prot_clr, mask);
> +
> +	if (bpd->ignore_clr_ack)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	return regmap_read_poll_timeout(regmap, bpd->bus_prot_sta, val,
> +					!(val & sta_mask), MTK_POLL_DELAY_US,
> +					MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT);
> +}
> +
> +static int scpsys_bus_way_enable(const struct scpsys_bus_prot_data *bpd,
> +				 struct regmap *regmap,
> +				 struct regmap *ack_regmap)
> +{
> +	u32 val;
> +	u32 mask = bpd->bus_prot_mask;
> +	u32 sta_mask = bpd->bus_prot_sta_mask;
> +
> +	if (bpd->bus_prot_reg_update)
> +		regmap_set_bits(regmap, bpd->bus_prot_clr, mask);
> +	else
> +		regmap_write(regmap, bpd->bus_prot_clr, mask);
> +
> +	return regmap_read_poll_timeout(ack_regmap, bpd->bus_prot_sta, val,
> +					(val & sta_mask) == sta_mask,
> +					MTK_POLL_DELAY_US, MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT);
>   }
>   
>   static int _scpsys_bus_protect_disable(const struct scpsys_bus_prot_data *bpd,
> -				       struct regmap *regmap)
> +				       struct regmap *regmap,
> +				       struct regmap *infracfg_nao)
>   {
>   	int i, ret;
>   
>   	for (i = SPM_MAX_BUS_PROT_DATA - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
> -		u32 val, mask = bpd[i].bus_prot_mask;
> -
> -		if (!mask)
> +		if (!bpd[i].bus_prot_mask)
>   			continue;
>   
> -		if (bpd[i].bus_prot_reg_update)
> -			regmap_clear_bits(regmap, bpd[i].bus_prot_clr, mask);
> +		if (bpd[i].way_en)
> +			ret = scpsys_bus_way_enable(&bpd[i], regmap,
> +						    infracfg_nao);
>   		else
> -			regmap_write(regmap, bpd[i].bus_prot_clr, mask);
> -
> -		if (bpd[i].ignore_clr_ack)
> -			continue;
> -
> -		ret = regmap_read_poll_timeout(regmap, bpd[i].bus_prot_sta,
> -					       val, !(val & mask),
> -					       MTK_POLL_DELAY_US, MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT);
> -		if (ret)
> +			ret = __scpsys_bus_protect_disable(&bpd[i], regmap);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			pr_err("%s %d %d\n", __PRETTY_FUNCTION__, __LINE__, ret);
>   			return ret;
> +		}
>   	}
>   
>   	return 0;
> @@ -186,11 +256,12 @@ static int scpsys_bus_protect_disable(struct scpsys_domain *pd)
>   {
>   	int ret;
>   
> -	ret = _scpsys_bus_protect_disable(pd->data->bp_smi, pd->smi);
> +	ret = _scpsys_bus_protect_disable(pd->data->bp_smi, pd->smi, NULL);
>   	if (ret)
>   		return ret;
>   
> -	return _scpsys_bus_protect_disable(pd->data->bp_infracfg, pd->infracfg);
> +	return _scpsys_bus_protect_disable(pd->data->bp_infracfg,
> +			pd->infracfg, pd->infracfg_nao);
>   }
>   
>   static int scpsys_regulator_enable(struct regulator *supply)
> @@ -294,6 +365,21 @@ static int scpsys_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> +static bool scpsys_bp_infracfg_has_way_en(const struct scpsys_bus_prot_data *bpd)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < SPM_MAX_BUS_PROT_DATA; i++) {
> +		if (!bpd[i].bus_prot_mask)
> +			break;

So MT8365_POWER_DOMAIN_MM will return false as the first member of bp_infracfg 
is BUS_PROT_WR(...)

Apart from that, why don't you use a CAPS to acheive the same?

> +
> +		if (bpd[i].way_en)
> +			return true;
> +	}
> +
> +	return false;
> +}
> +
>   static struct
>   generic_pm_domain *scpsys_add_one_domain(struct scpsys *scpsys, struct device_node *node)
>   {
> @@ -364,6 +450,20 @@ generic_pm_domain *scpsys_add_one_domain(struct scpsys *scpsys, struct device_no
>   			return ERR_CAST(pd->smi);
>   	}
>   
> +	if (scpsys_bp_infracfg_has_way_en(pd->data->bp_smi)) {
> +		dev_err(scpsys->dev, "bp_smi does not support WAY_EN\n");

Do we really need to check the correctness of the driver data at runtime?

> +		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> +	}
> +
> +	pd->infracfg_nao = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle_optional(
> +		node, "mediatek,infracfg_nao");

Not in the binding description.

> +	if (IS_ERR(pd->infracfg_nao)) {
> +		if (scpsys_bp_infracfg_has_way_en(pd->data->bp_infracfg))
> +			return ERR_CAST(pd->infracfg_nao);
> +
> +		pd->infracfg_nao = NULL;
> +	}
> +
>   	num_clks = of_clk_get_parent_count(node);
>   	if (num_clks > 0) {
>   		/* Calculate number of subsys_clks */
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h
> index 7d3c0c36316c..974c68a1d89c 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h
> +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h
> @@ -41,23 +41,29 @@
>   
>   #define SPM_MAX_BUS_PROT_DATA		6
>   
> -#define _BUS_PROT(_mask, _set, _clr, _sta, _update, _ignore) {	\
> -		.bus_prot_mask = (_mask),			\
> -		.bus_prot_set = _set,				\
> -		.bus_prot_clr = _clr,				\
> -		.bus_prot_sta = _sta,				\
> -		.bus_prot_reg_update = _update,			\
> -		.ignore_clr_ack = _ignore,			\
> +#define _BUS_PROT(_mask, _sta_mask, _set, _clr, _sta, _update, _ignore, _way_en) {	\
> +		.bus_prot_mask = (_mask),				\
> +		.bus_prot_set = _set,					\
> +		.bus_prot_clr = _clr,					\
> +		.bus_prot_sta = _sta,					\
> +		.bus_prot_sta_mask = _sta_mask,				\
> +		.bus_prot_reg_update = _update,				\
> +		.ignore_clr_ack = _ignore,				\
> +		.way_en = _way_en,					\
>   	}
>   
>   #define BUS_PROT_WR(_mask, _set, _clr, _sta)			\
> -		_BUS_PROT(_mask, _set, _clr, _sta, false, false)
> +		_BUS_PROT(_mask, _mask, _set, _clr, _sta, false, false, false)
>   
>   #define BUS_PROT_WR_IGN(_mask, _set, _clr, _sta)		\
> -		_BUS_PROT(_mask, _set, _clr, _sta, false, true)
> +		_BUS_PROT(_mask, _mask, _set, _clr, _sta, false, true, false)
>   
>   #define BUS_PROT_UPDATE(_mask, _set, _clr, _sta)		\
> -		_BUS_PROT(_mask, _set, _clr, _sta, true, false)
> +		_BUS_PROT(_mask, _mask, _set, _clr, _sta, true, false, false)
> +
> +#define BUS_PROT_WAY_EN(_en_mask, _sta_mask, _set, _sta)	\
> +		_BUS_PROT(_en_mask, _sta_mask, _set, _set, _sta, true, false, \
> +			  true)
>   
>   #define BUS_PROT_UPDATE_TOPAXI(_mask)				\
>   		BUS_PROT_UPDATE(_mask,				\
> @@ -70,8 +76,10 @@ struct scpsys_bus_prot_data {
>   	u32 bus_prot_set;
>   	u32 bus_prot_clr;
>   	u32 bus_prot_sta;
> +	u32 bus_prot_sta_mask;

I'm not very happy with the naming. In the end we need an extra mask for bus 
protection using WAY_EN. But right now I can't come up with a good name.

Regards,
Matthias

>   	bool bus_prot_reg_update;
>   	bool ignore_clr_ack;
> +	bool way_en;
>   };
>   
>   /**

Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] soc: mediatek: Add support of WAY_EN operations

[Markus Schneider-Pargmann]

Hi Matthias,

On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 06:17:58PM +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> 
> 
> On 22/08/2022 16:43, Markus Schneider-Pargmann wrote:
> > From: Alexandre Bailon <abailon@baylibre.com>
> > 
> > This updates the power domain to support WAY_EN operations. These
> > operations enable a path between different units of the chip and are
> > labeled as 'way_en' in the register descriptions.
> > 
> > This operation is required by the mt8365 for the MM power domain.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Bailon <abailon@baylibre.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Fabien Parent <fparent@baylibre.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@baylibre.com>
> > ---
> > 
> > Notes:
> >      Changes in v3:
> >      - Separated the way_en functions for clarity
> >      - Added some checks for infracfg_nao
> >      Changes in v2:
> >      - some minor style fixes.
> >      - Renamed 'wayen' to 'way_en' to clarify the meaning
> >      - Updated commit message
> > 
> >   drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c | 162 +++++++++++++++++++++-----
> >   drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h |  28 +++--
> >   2 files changed, 149 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c
> > index 9734f1091c69..c2cbe0de6aa1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c
> > +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c
> > @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ struct scpsys_domain {
> >   	struct clk_bulk_data *clks;
> >   	int num_subsys_clks;
> >   	struct clk_bulk_data *subsys_clks;
> > +	struct regmap *infracfg_nao;
> >   	struct regmap *infracfg;
> >   	struct regmap *smi;
> >   	struct regulator *supply;
> > @@ -117,26 +118,61 @@ static int scpsys_sram_disable(struct scpsys_domain *pd)
> >   					MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT);
> >   }
> > -static int _scpsys_bus_protect_enable(const struct scpsys_bus_prot_data *bpd, struct regmap *regmap)
> > +static int __scpsys_bus_protect_enable(const struct scpsys_bus_prot_data *bpd,
> > +				       struct regmap *regmap)
> > +{
> > +	u32 val;
> > +	u32 mask = bpd->bus_prot_mask;
> > +	u32 sta_mask = bpd->bus_prot_sta_mask;
> > +
> > +	if (bpd->bus_prot_reg_update)
> > +		regmap_set_bits(regmap, bpd->bus_prot_set, mask);
> > +	else
> > +		regmap_write(regmap, bpd->bus_prot_set, mask);
> > +
> > +	return regmap_read_poll_timeout(regmap, bpd->bus_prot_sta, val,
> > +					(val & sta_mask) == sta_mask,
> > +					MTK_POLL_DELAY_US, MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int scpsys_bus_way_disable(const struct scpsys_bus_prot_data *bpd,
> > +				  struct regmap *regmap,
> > +				  struct regmap *ack_regmap)
> > +{
> > +	u32 val;
> > +	u32 mask = bpd->bus_prot_mask;
> > +	u32 sta_mask = bpd->bus_prot_sta_mask;
> > +
> > +	if (bpd->bus_prot_reg_update)
> > +		regmap_clear_bits(regmap, bpd->bus_prot_set, mask);
> > +	else
> > +		regmap_write(regmap, bpd->bus_prot_set, mask);
> > +
> > +	if (bpd->ignore_clr_ack)
> > +		return 0;
> > +
> > +	return regmap_read_poll_timeout(ack_regmap, bpd->bus_prot_sta, val,
> > +					(val & sta_mask) == sta_mask,
> > +					MTK_POLL_DELAY_US, MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int _scpsys_bus_protect_enable(const struct scpsys_bus_prot_data *bpd,
> > +				      struct regmap *regmap, struct regmap *infracfg_nao)
> >   {
> >   	int i, ret;
> >   	for (i = 0; i < SPM_MAX_BUS_PROT_DATA; i++) {
> > -		u32 val, mask = bpd[i].bus_prot_mask;
> > -
> > -		if (!mask)
> > +		if (!bpd[i].bus_prot_mask)
> >   			break;
> > -		if (bpd[i].bus_prot_reg_update)
> > -			regmap_set_bits(regmap, bpd[i].bus_prot_set, mask);
> > +		if (bpd[i].way_en)
> > +			ret = scpsys_bus_way_disable(&bpd[i], regmap, infracfg_nao);
> >   		else
> > -			regmap_write(regmap, bpd[i].bus_prot_set, mask);
> > -
> > -		ret = regmap_read_poll_timeout(regmap, bpd[i].bus_prot_sta,
> > -					       val, (val & mask) == mask,
> > -					       MTK_POLL_DELAY_US, MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT);
> > -		if (ret)
> > +			ret = __scpsys_bus_protect_enable(&bpd[i], regmap);
> > +		if (ret) {
> > +			pr_err("%s %d %d\n", __PRETTY_FUNCTION__, __LINE__, ret);
> >   			return ret;
> > +		}
> >   	}
> >   	return 0;
> > @@ -146,37 +182,71 @@ static int scpsys_bus_protect_enable(struct scpsys_domain *pd)
> >   {
> >   	int ret;
> > -	ret = _scpsys_bus_protect_enable(pd->data->bp_infracfg, pd->infracfg);
> > +	ret = _scpsys_bus_protect_enable(pd->data->bp_infracfg,
> > +					 pd->infracfg, pd->infracfg_nao);
> >   	if (ret)
> >   		return ret;
> > -	return _scpsys_bus_protect_enable(pd->data->bp_smi, pd->smi);
> > +	return _scpsys_bus_protect_enable(pd->data->bp_smi, pd->smi, NULL);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int __scpsys_bus_protect_disable(const struct scpsys_bus_prot_data *bpd,
> > +					struct regmap *regmap)
> > +{
> > +	u32 val;
> > +	u32 mask = bpd->bus_prot_mask;
> > +	u32 sta_mask = bpd->bus_prot_sta_mask;
> > +
> > +	if (bpd->bus_prot_reg_update)
> > +		regmap_clear_bits(regmap, bpd->bus_prot_clr, mask);
> > +	else
> > +		regmap_write(regmap, bpd->bus_prot_clr, mask);
> > +
> > +	if (bpd->ignore_clr_ack)
> > +		return 0;
> > +
> > +	return regmap_read_poll_timeout(regmap, bpd->bus_prot_sta, val,
> > +					!(val & sta_mask), MTK_POLL_DELAY_US,
> > +					MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int scpsys_bus_way_enable(const struct scpsys_bus_prot_data *bpd,
> > +				 struct regmap *regmap,
> > +				 struct regmap *ack_regmap)
> > +{
> > +	u32 val;
> > +	u32 mask = bpd->bus_prot_mask;
> > +	u32 sta_mask = bpd->bus_prot_sta_mask;
> > +
> > +	if (bpd->bus_prot_reg_update)
> > +		regmap_set_bits(regmap, bpd->bus_prot_clr, mask);
> > +	else
> > +		regmap_write(regmap, bpd->bus_prot_clr, mask);
> > +
> > +	return regmap_read_poll_timeout(ack_regmap, bpd->bus_prot_sta, val,
> > +					(val & sta_mask) == sta_mask,
> > +					MTK_POLL_DELAY_US, MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT);
> >   }
> >   static int _scpsys_bus_protect_disable(const struct scpsys_bus_prot_data *bpd,
> > -				       struct regmap *regmap)
> > +				       struct regmap *regmap,
> > +				       struct regmap *infracfg_nao)
> >   {
> >   	int i, ret;
> >   	for (i = SPM_MAX_BUS_PROT_DATA - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
> > -		u32 val, mask = bpd[i].bus_prot_mask;
> > -
> > -		if (!mask)
> > +		if (!bpd[i].bus_prot_mask)
> >   			continue;
> > -		if (bpd[i].bus_prot_reg_update)
> > -			regmap_clear_bits(regmap, bpd[i].bus_prot_clr, mask);
> > +		if (bpd[i].way_en)
> > +			ret = scpsys_bus_way_enable(&bpd[i], regmap,
> > +						    infracfg_nao);
> >   		else
> > -			regmap_write(regmap, bpd[i].bus_prot_clr, mask);
> > -
> > -		if (bpd[i].ignore_clr_ack)
> > -			continue;
> > -
> > -		ret = regmap_read_poll_timeout(regmap, bpd[i].bus_prot_sta,
> > -					       val, !(val & mask),
> > -					       MTK_POLL_DELAY_US, MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT);
> > -		if (ret)
> > +			ret = __scpsys_bus_protect_disable(&bpd[i], regmap);
> > +		if (ret) {
> > +			pr_err("%s %d %d\n", __PRETTY_FUNCTION__, __LINE__, ret);
> >   			return ret;
> > +		}
> >   	}
> >   	return 0;
> > @@ -186,11 +256,12 @@ static int scpsys_bus_protect_disable(struct scpsys_domain *pd)
> >   {
> >   	int ret;
> > -	ret = _scpsys_bus_protect_disable(pd->data->bp_smi, pd->smi);
> > +	ret = _scpsys_bus_protect_disable(pd->data->bp_smi, pd->smi, NULL);
> >   	if (ret)
> >   		return ret;
> > -	return _scpsys_bus_protect_disable(pd->data->bp_infracfg, pd->infracfg);
> > +	return _scpsys_bus_protect_disable(pd->data->bp_infracfg,
> > +			pd->infracfg, pd->infracfg_nao);
> >   }
> >   static int scpsys_regulator_enable(struct regulator *supply)
> > @@ -294,6 +365,21 @@ static int scpsys_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
> >   	return 0;
> >   }
> > +static bool scpsys_bp_infracfg_has_way_en(const struct scpsys_bus_prot_data *bpd)
> > +{
> > +	int i;
> > +
> > +	for (i = 0; i < SPM_MAX_BUS_PROT_DATA; i++) {
> > +		if (!bpd[i].bus_prot_mask)
> > +			break;
> 
> So MT8365_POWER_DOMAIN_MM will return false as the first member of
> bp_infracfg is BUS_PROT_WR(...)

I am not sure I understand what you mean. Why should it break out of the
loop if the first member is a BUS_PROT_WR()? BUS_PROT_WR() sets a mask
as well which is checked here exactly the same way as is done in
_scpsys_bus_protect_enable() even before this patch.

This is only a loop condition. Actually I can move it into the loop
header as well. Either you define SPM_MAX_BUS_PROT_DATA fields or you
have to exit if you find a field that is empty, basically the mask not
being set.

> 
> Apart from that, why don't you use a CAPS to acheive the same?
> 
> > +
> > +		if (bpd[i].way_en)
> > +			return true;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return false;
> > +}
> > +
> >   static struct
> >   generic_pm_domain *scpsys_add_one_domain(struct scpsys *scpsys, struct device_node *node)
> >   {
> > @@ -364,6 +450,20 @@ generic_pm_domain *scpsys_add_one_domain(struct scpsys *scpsys, struct device_no
> >   			return ERR_CAST(pd->smi);
> >   	}
> > +	if (scpsys_bp_infracfg_has_way_en(pd->data->bp_smi)) {
> > +		dev_err(scpsys->dev, "bp_smi does not support WAY_EN\n");
> 
> Do we really need to check the correctness of the driver data at runtime?

bp_smi is called without a infracfg_nao regmap. If we don't check it
here, we need to make a check during bus protection operations. Last
time I got a review to not do it during in the bus protection path.

> 
> > +		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	pd->infracfg_nao = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle_optional(
> > +		node, "mediatek,infracfg_nao");
> 
> Not in the binding description.

Thanks, I will fix that for the next version.

> 
> > +	if (IS_ERR(pd->infracfg_nao)) {
> > +		if (scpsys_bp_infracfg_has_way_en(pd->data->bp_infracfg))
> > +			return ERR_CAST(pd->infracfg_nao);
> > +
> > +		pd->infracfg_nao = NULL;
> > +	}
> > +
> >   	num_clks = of_clk_get_parent_count(node);
> >   	if (num_clks > 0) {
> >   		/* Calculate number of subsys_clks */
> > diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h
> > index 7d3c0c36316c..974c68a1d89c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h
> > +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h
> > @@ -41,23 +41,29 @@
> >   #define SPM_MAX_BUS_PROT_DATA		6
> > -#define _BUS_PROT(_mask, _set, _clr, _sta, _update, _ignore) {	\
> > -		.bus_prot_mask = (_mask),			\
> > -		.bus_prot_set = _set,				\
> > -		.bus_prot_clr = _clr,				\
> > -		.bus_prot_sta = _sta,				\
> > -		.bus_prot_reg_update = _update,			\
> > -		.ignore_clr_ack = _ignore,			\
> > +#define _BUS_PROT(_mask, _sta_mask, _set, _clr, _sta, _update, _ignore, _way_en) {	\
> > +		.bus_prot_mask = (_mask),				\
> > +		.bus_prot_set = _set,					\
> > +		.bus_prot_clr = _clr,					\
> > +		.bus_prot_sta = _sta,					\
> > +		.bus_prot_sta_mask = _sta_mask,				\
> > +		.bus_prot_reg_update = _update,				\
> > +		.ignore_clr_ack = _ignore,				\
> > +		.way_en = _way_en,					\
> >   	}
> >   #define BUS_PROT_WR(_mask, _set, _clr, _sta)			\
> > -		_BUS_PROT(_mask, _set, _clr, _sta, false, false)
> > +		_BUS_PROT(_mask, _mask, _set, _clr, _sta, false, false, false)
> >   #define BUS_PROT_WR_IGN(_mask, _set, _clr, _sta)		\
> > -		_BUS_PROT(_mask, _set, _clr, _sta, false, true)
> > +		_BUS_PROT(_mask, _mask, _set, _clr, _sta, false, true, false)
> >   #define BUS_PROT_UPDATE(_mask, _set, _clr, _sta)		\
> > -		_BUS_PROT(_mask, _set, _clr, _sta, true, false)
> > +		_BUS_PROT(_mask, _mask, _set, _clr, _sta, true, false, false)
> > +
> > +#define BUS_PROT_WAY_EN(_en_mask, _sta_mask, _set, _sta)	\
> > +		_BUS_PROT(_en_mask, _sta_mask, _set, _set, _sta, true, false, \
> > +			  true)
> >   #define BUS_PROT_UPDATE_TOPAXI(_mask)				\
> >   		BUS_PROT_UPDATE(_mask,				\
> > @@ -70,8 +76,10 @@ struct scpsys_bus_prot_data {
> >   	u32 bus_prot_set;
> >   	u32 bus_prot_clr;
> >   	u32 bus_prot_sta;
> > +	u32 bus_prot_sta_mask;
> 
> I'm not very happy with the naming. In the end we need an extra mask for bus
> protection using WAY_EN. But right now I can't come up with a good name.

I think the naming is good as it is a specific mask for the status
register. bus_prot_mask is now basically only responsible for set and
clr. Maybe renaming bus_prot_mask to bus_prot_set_clr_mask is better?

Thanks,
Markus

> 
> Regards,
> Matthias
> 
> >   	bool bus_prot_reg_update;
> >   	bool ignore_clr_ack;
> > +	bool way_en;
> >   };
> >   /**

Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] soc: mediatek: Add support of WAY_EN operations

[Matthias Brugger]

On 06/09/2022 11:49, Markus Schneider-Pargmann wrote:
> Hi Matthias,
> 
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 06:17:58PM +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 22/08/2022 16:43, Markus Schneider-Pargmann wrote:
>>> From: Alexandre Bailon <abailon@baylibre.com>
>>>
>>> This updates the power domain to support WAY_EN operations. These
>>> operations enable a path between different units of the chip and are
>>> labeled as 'way_en' in the register descriptions.

If you can come up with a more verbose description of WAY_EN functionality it 
would be appreciated, although I know it's not always easy to get that 
information. 10 years in it will help to understand better what this is about.

>>>
>>> This operation is required by the mt8365 for the MM power domain.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Bailon <abailon@baylibre.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Fabien Parent <fparent@baylibre.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@baylibre.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Notes:
>>>       Changes in v3:
>>>       - Separated the way_en functions for clarity
>>>       - Added some checks for infracfg_nao
>>>       Changes in v2:
>>>       - some minor style fixes.
>>>       - Renamed 'wayen' to 'way_en' to clarify the meaning
>>>       - Updated commit message
>>>
>>>    drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c | 162 +++++++++++++++++++++-----
>>>    drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h |  28 +++--
>>>    2 files changed, 149 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c
>>> index 9734f1091c69..c2cbe0de6aa1 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c
>>> @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ struct scpsys_domain {
>>>    	struct clk_bulk_data *clks;
>>>    	int num_subsys_clks;
>>>    	struct clk_bulk_data *subsys_clks;
>>> +	struct regmap *infracfg_nao;
>>>    	struct regmap *infracfg;
>>>    	struct regmap *smi;
>>>    	struct regulator *supply;
>>> @@ -117,26 +118,61 @@ static int scpsys_sram_disable(struct scpsys_domain *pd)
>>>    					MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT);
>>>    }
>>> -static int _scpsys_bus_protect_enable(const struct scpsys_bus_prot_data *bpd, struct regmap *regmap)
>>> +static int __scpsys_bus_protect_enable(const struct scpsys_bus_prot_data *bpd,
>>> +				       struct regmap *regmap)
>>> +{
>>> +	u32 val;
>>> +	u32 mask = bpd->bus_prot_mask;
>>> +	u32 sta_mask = bpd->bus_prot_sta_mask;
>>> +
>>> +	if (bpd->bus_prot_reg_update)
>>> +		regmap_set_bits(regmap, bpd->bus_prot_set, mask);
>>> +	else
>>> +		regmap_write(regmap, bpd->bus_prot_set, mask);
>>> +
>>> +	return regmap_read_poll_timeout(regmap, bpd->bus_prot_sta, val,
>>> +					(val & sta_mask) == sta_mask,
>>> +					MTK_POLL_DELAY_US, MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int scpsys_bus_way_disable(const struct scpsys_bus_prot_data *bpd,
>>> +				  struct regmap *regmap,
>>> +				  struct regmap *ack_regmap)
>>> +{
>>> +	u32 val;
>>> +	u32 mask = bpd->bus_prot_mask;
>>> +	u32 sta_mask = bpd->bus_prot_sta_mask;
>>> +
>>> +	if (bpd->bus_prot_reg_update)
>>> +		regmap_clear_bits(regmap, bpd->bus_prot_set, mask);
>>> +	else
>>> +		regmap_write(regmap, bpd->bus_prot_set, mask);

BUS_PROT_WAY_EN sets bus_prot_reg_update to true, what do we need the else 
branch for?

>>> +
>>> +	if (bpd->ignore_clr_ack)
>>> +		return 0;

Same here, ignore_clr_ack is always false.

Actually it seems to me that __scpsys_bus_protect_enable and 
scpsys_bus_way_disable is nearly the same (other regmap, regmap_clear_bits 
instead of set_bits). Can't we put the check of way_en in e.g. the old 
_scpsys_bus_protect_enable to get rid of all the code duplication?

>>> +
>>> +	return regmap_read_poll_timeout(ack_regmap, bpd->bus_prot_sta, val,
>>> +					(val & sta_mask) == sta_mask,
>>> +					MTK_POLL_DELAY_US, MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int _scpsys_bus_protect_enable(const struct scpsys_bus_prot_data *bpd,
>>> +				      struct regmap *regmap, struct regmap *infracfg_nao)
>>>    {
>>>    	int i, ret;
>>>    	for (i = 0; i < SPM_MAX_BUS_PROT_DATA; i++) {
>>> -		u32 val, mask = bpd[i].bus_prot_mask;
>>> -
>>> -		if (!mask)
>>> +		if (!bpd[i].bus_prot_mask)
>>>    			break;
>>> -		if (bpd[i].bus_prot_reg_update)
>>> -			regmap_set_bits(regmap, bpd[i].bus_prot_set, mask);
>>> +		if (bpd[i].way_en)
>>> +			ret = scpsys_bus_way_disable(&bpd[i], regmap, infracfg_nao);
>>>    		else
>>> -			regmap_write(regmap, bpd[i].bus_prot_set, mask);
>>> -
>>> -		ret = regmap_read_poll_timeout(regmap, bpd[i].bus_prot_sta,
>>> -					       val, (val & mask) == mask,
>>> -					       MTK_POLL_DELAY_US, MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT);
>>> -		if (ret)
>>> +			ret = __scpsys_bus_protect_enable(&bpd[i], regmap);
>>> +		if (ret) {
>>> +			pr_err("%s %d %d\n", __PRETTY_FUNCTION__, __LINE__, ret);
>>>    			return ret;
>>> +		}
>>>    	}
>>>    	return 0;
>>> @@ -146,37 +182,71 @@ static int scpsys_bus_protect_enable(struct scpsys_domain *pd)
>>>    {
>>>    	int ret;
>>> -	ret = _scpsys_bus_protect_enable(pd->data->bp_infracfg, pd->infracfg);
>>> +	ret = _scpsys_bus_protect_enable(pd->data->bp_infracfg,
>>> +					 pd->infracfg, pd->infracfg_nao);
>>>    	if (ret)
>>>    		return ret;
>>> -	return _scpsys_bus_protect_enable(pd->data->bp_smi, pd->smi);
>>> +	return _scpsys_bus_protect_enable(pd->data->bp_smi, pd->smi, NULL);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int __scpsys_bus_protect_disable(const struct scpsys_bus_prot_data *bpd,
>>> +					struct regmap *regmap)
>>> +{
>>> +	u32 val;
>>> +	u32 mask = bpd->bus_prot_mask;
>>> +	u32 sta_mask = bpd->bus_prot_sta_mask;
>>> +
>>> +	if (bpd->bus_prot_reg_update)
>>> +		regmap_clear_bits(regmap, bpd->bus_prot_clr, mask);
>>> +	else
>>> +		regmap_write(regmap, bpd->bus_prot_clr, mask);
>>> +
>>> +	if (bpd->ignore_clr_ack)
>>> +		return 0;
>>> +
>>> +	return regmap_read_poll_timeout(regmap, bpd->bus_prot_sta, val,
>>> +					!(val & sta_mask), MTK_POLL_DELAY_US,
>>> +					MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int scpsys_bus_way_enable(const struct scpsys_bus_prot_data *bpd,
>>> +				 struct regmap *regmap,
>>> +				 struct regmap *ack_regmap)
>>> +{
>>> +	u32 val;
>>> +	u32 mask = bpd->bus_prot_mask;
>>> +	u32 sta_mask = bpd->bus_prot_sta_mask;
>>> +
>>> +	if (bpd->bus_prot_reg_update)
>>> +		regmap_set_bits(regmap, bpd->bus_prot_clr, mask);
>>> +	else
>>> +		regmap_write(regmap, bpd->bus_prot_clr, mask);

same as disable case.

>>> +
>>> +	return regmap_read_poll_timeout(ack_regmap, bpd->bus_prot_sta, val,
>>> +					(val & sta_mask) == sta_mask,
>>> +					MTK_POLL_DELAY_US, MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT);
>>>    }
>>>    static int _scpsys_bus_protect_disable(const struct scpsys_bus_prot_data *bpd,
>>> -				       struct regmap *regmap)
>>> +				       struct regmap *regmap,
>>> +				       struct regmap *infracfg_nao)
>>>    {
>>>    	int i, ret;
>>>    	for (i = SPM_MAX_BUS_PROT_DATA - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
>>> -		u32 val, mask = bpd[i].bus_prot_mask;
>>> -
>>> -		if (!mask)
>>> +		if (!bpd[i].bus_prot_mask)
>>>    			continue;
>>> -		if (bpd[i].bus_prot_reg_update)
>>> -			regmap_clear_bits(regmap, bpd[i].bus_prot_clr, mask);
>>> +		if (bpd[i].way_en)
>>> +			ret = scpsys_bus_way_enable(&bpd[i], regmap,
>>> +						    infracfg_nao);
>>>    		else
>>> -			regmap_write(regmap, bpd[i].bus_prot_clr, mask);
>>> -
>>> -		if (bpd[i].ignore_clr_ack)
>>> -			continue;
>>> -
>>> -		ret = regmap_read_poll_timeout(regmap, bpd[i].bus_prot_sta,
>>> -					       val, !(val & mask),
>>> -					       MTK_POLL_DELAY_US, MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT);
>>> -		if (ret)
>>> +			ret = __scpsys_bus_protect_disable(&bpd[i], regmap);
>>> +		if (ret) {
>>> +			pr_err("%s %d %d\n", __PRETTY_FUNCTION__, __LINE__, ret);
>>>    			return ret;
>>> +		}
>>>    	}
>>>    	return 0;
>>> @@ -186,11 +256,12 @@ static int scpsys_bus_protect_disable(struct scpsys_domain *pd)
>>>    {
>>>    	int ret;
>>> -	ret = _scpsys_bus_protect_disable(pd->data->bp_smi, pd->smi);
>>> +	ret = _scpsys_bus_protect_disable(pd->data->bp_smi, pd->smi, NULL);
>>>    	if (ret)
>>>    		return ret;
>>> -	return _scpsys_bus_protect_disable(pd->data->bp_infracfg, pd->infracfg);
>>> +	return _scpsys_bus_protect_disable(pd->data->bp_infracfg,
>>> +			pd->infracfg, pd->infracfg_nao);
>>>    }
>>>    static int scpsys_regulator_enable(struct regulator *supply)
>>> @@ -294,6 +365,21 @@ static int scpsys_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
>>>    	return 0;
>>>    }
>>> +static bool scpsys_bp_infracfg_has_way_en(const struct scpsys_bus_prot_data *bpd)
>>> +{
>>> +	int i;
>>> +
>>> +	for (i = 0; i < SPM_MAX_BUS_PROT_DATA; i++) {
>>> +		if (!bpd[i].bus_prot_mask)
>>> +			break;
>>
>> So MT8365_POWER_DOMAIN_MM will return false as the first member of
>> bp_infracfg is BUS_PROT_WR(...)
> 
> I am not sure I understand what you mean. Why should it break out of the
> loop if the first member is a BUS_PROT_WR()? BUS_PROT_WR() sets a mask
> as well which is checked here exactly the same way as is done in
> _scpsys_bus_protect_enable() even before this patch.

Right, my error, please see comment further down about the new macros.

> 
> This is only a loop condition. Actually I can move it into the loop
> header as well. Either you define SPM_MAX_BUS_PROT_DATA fields or you
> have to exit if you find a field that is empty, basically the mask not
> being set.
> 
>>
>> Apart from that, why don't you use a CAPS to acheive the same?
>>

Just in case you missed that. I'd pretty much prefer to add a caps to 
scpsys_domain_data signaling that the power domain uses WAY_EN.

>>> +
>>> +		if (bpd[i].way_en)
>>> +			return true;
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>> +	return false;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>    static struct
>>>    generic_pm_domain *scpsys_add_one_domain(struct scpsys *scpsys, struct device_node *node)
>>>    {
>>> @@ -364,6 +450,20 @@ generic_pm_domain *scpsys_add_one_domain(struct scpsys *scpsys, struct device_no
>>>    			return ERR_CAST(pd->smi);
>>>    	}
>>> +	if (scpsys_bp_infracfg_has_way_en(pd->data->bp_smi)) {
>>> +		dev_err(scpsys->dev, "bp_smi does not support WAY_EN\n");
>>
>> Do we really need to check the correctness of the driver data at runtime?
> 
> bp_smi is called without a infracfg_nao regmap. If we don't check it
> here, we need to make a check during bus protection operations. Last
> time I got a review to not do it during in the bus protection path.
> 

Maybe I'm missing something here but bpi_smi is defined in the 
scpsys_domain_data. Why do we need to check at runtime if the SoC specific data 
hardcoded in the dirver is correct? What am I missing here?

Apart do I understand correctly that the second call to 
_scpsys_bus_protect_enable() in scpsys_bus_protect_enable() will never use 
way_en? My understanding that this also holds for the disable path. Can't we 
remodel the code that in this case we don't loop over scpsys_bus_prot_data and 
check for way_en?

>>
>>> +		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>> +	pd->infracfg_nao = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle_optional(
>>> +		node, "mediatek,infracfg_nao");
>>
>> Not in the binding description.
> 
> Thanks, I will fix that for the next version.
> 
>>
>>> +	if (IS_ERR(pd->infracfg_nao)) {
>>> +		if (scpsys_bp_infracfg_has_way_en(pd->data->bp_infracfg))
>>> +			return ERR_CAST(pd->infracfg_nao);
>>> +
>>> +		pd->infracfg_nao = NULL;
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>>    	num_clks = of_clk_get_parent_count(node);
>>>    	if (num_clks > 0) {
>>>    		/* Calculate number of subsys_clks */
>>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h
>>> index 7d3c0c36316c..974c68a1d89c 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h
>>> @@ -41,23 +41,29 @@
>>>    #define SPM_MAX_BUS_PROT_DATA		6
>>> -#define _BUS_PROT(_mask, _set, _clr, _sta, _update, _ignore) {	\
>>> -		.bus_prot_mask = (_mask),			\
>>> -		.bus_prot_set = _set,				\
>>> -		.bus_prot_clr = _clr,				\
>>> -		.bus_prot_sta = _sta,				\
>>> -		.bus_prot_reg_update = _update,			\
>>> -		.ignore_clr_ack = _ignore,			\
>>> +#define _BUS_PROT(_mask, _sta_mask, _set, _clr, _sta, _update, _ignore, _way_en) {	\

_sta_mask is second parameter but not second member of the struct. That makes 
reading the driver unnecessary complicated.

>>> +		.bus_prot_mask = (_mask),				\
>>> +		.bus_prot_set = _set,					\
>>> +		.bus_prot_clr = _clr,					\
>>> +		.bus_prot_sta = _sta,					\
>>> +		.bus_prot_sta_mask = _sta_mask,				\
>>> +		.bus_prot_reg_update = _update,				\
>>> +		.ignore_clr_ack = _ignore,				\
>>> +		.way_en = _way_en,					\
>>>    	}
>>>    #define BUS_PROT_WR(_mask, _set, _clr, _sta)			\
>>> -		_BUS_PROT(_mask, _set, _clr, _sta, false, false)
>>> +		_BUS_PROT(_mask, _mask, _set, _clr, _sta, false, false, false)
>>>    #define BUS_PROT_WR_IGN(_mask, _set, _clr, _sta)		\
>>> -		_BUS_PROT(_mask, _set, _clr, _sta, false, true)
>>> +		_BUS_PROT(_mask, _mask, _set, _clr, _sta, false, true, false)
>>>    #define BUS_PROT_UPDATE(_mask, _set, _clr, _sta)		\
>>> -		_BUS_PROT(_mask, _set, _clr, _sta, true, false)
>>> +		_BUS_PROT(_mask, _mask, _set, _clr, _sta, true, false, false)
>>> +
>>> +#define BUS_PROT_WAY_EN(_en_mask, _sta_mask, _set, _sta)	\
>>> +		_BUS_PROT(_en_mask, _sta_mask, _set, _set, _sta, true, false, \
>>> +			  true)
>>>    #define BUS_PROT_UPDATE_TOPAXI(_mask)				\
>>>    		BUS_PROT_UPDATE(_mask,				\
>>> @@ -70,8 +76,10 @@ struct scpsys_bus_prot_data {
>>>    	u32 bus_prot_set;
>>>    	u32 bus_prot_clr;
>>>    	u32 bus_prot_sta;
>>> +	u32 bus_prot_sta_mask;
>>
>> I'm not very happy with the naming. In the end we need an extra mask for bus
>> protection using WAY_EN. But right now I can't come up with a good name.
> 
> I think the naming is good as it is a specific mask for the status
> register. bus_prot_mask is now basically only responsible for set and
> clr. Maybe renaming bus_prot_mask to bus_prot_set_clr_mask is better?

Yes makes sense. Please add this as an extra patch for easier review.

Regards,
Matthias

> 
> Thanks,
> Markus
> 
>>
>> Regards,
>> Matthias
>>
>>>    	bool bus_prot_reg_update;
>>>    	bool ignore_clr_ack;
>>> +	bool way_en;
>>>    };
>>>    /**

[PATCH v3 3/4] soc: mediatek: add support of MTK_SCPD_STRICT_BUSP cap

[Markus Schneider-Pargmann]

From: Alexandre Bailon <abailon@baylibre.com>

This adds support for MTK_SCPD_STRICT_BUSP capability. It is a strict
bus protection policy that requires the bus protection to be disabled
before accessing the bus.
This is required by the mt8365, for the MM power domain.

Signed-off-by: Alexandre Bailon <abailon@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Fabien Parent <fparent@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@baylibre.com>
---

Notes:
    Changes in v3:
    - Rename MTK_SCPD_STRICT_BUSP to MTK_SCPD_STRICT_BUS_PROTECTION
    - Remove extra bool variable reflecting the capability
    
    Changes in v2:
    - Fixup error handling path.

 drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++----
 drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h |  1 +
 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c
index c2cbe0de6aa1..d323275aa11c 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c
@@ -303,9 +303,17 @@ static int scpsys_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
 	regmap_clear_bits(scpsys->base, pd->data->ctl_offs, PWR_ISO_BIT);
 	regmap_set_bits(scpsys->base, pd->data->ctl_offs, PWR_RST_B_BIT);
 
-	ret = clk_bulk_prepare_enable(pd->num_subsys_clks, pd->subsys_clks);
-	if (ret)
-		goto err_pwr_ack;
+	/*
+	 * In few Mediatek platforms(e.g. MT6779), the bus protect policy is
+	 * stricter, which leads to bus protect release must be prior to bus
+	 * access.
+	 */
+	if (!MTK_SCPD_CAPS(pd, MTK_SCPD_STRICT_BUS_PROTECTION)) {
+		ret = clk_bulk_prepare_enable(pd->num_subsys_clks,
+					      pd->subsys_clks);
+		if (ret)
+			goto err_pwr_ack;
+	}
 
 	ret = scpsys_sram_enable(pd);
 	if (ret < 0)
@@ -315,12 +323,23 @@ static int scpsys_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
 	if (ret < 0)
 		goto err_disable_sram;
 
+	if (MTK_SCPD_CAPS(pd, MTK_SCPD_STRICT_BUS_PROTECTION)) {
+		ret = clk_bulk_prepare_enable(pd->num_subsys_clks,
+					      pd->subsys_clks);
+		if (ret)
+			goto err_enable_bus_protect;
+	}
+
 	return 0;
 
+err_enable_bus_protect:
+	scpsys_bus_protect_enable(pd);
 err_disable_sram:
 	scpsys_sram_disable(pd);
 err_disable_subsys_clks:
-	clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(pd->num_subsys_clks, pd->subsys_clks);
+	if (!MTK_SCPD_CAPS(pd, MTK_SCPD_STRICT_BUS_PROTECTION))
+		clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(pd->num_subsys_clks,
+					   pd->subsys_clks);
 err_pwr_ack:
 	clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(pd->num_clks, pd->clks);
 err_reg:
diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h
index 974c68a1d89c..493f3fa14612 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h
+++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
 #define MTK_SCPD_DOMAIN_SUPPLY		BIT(4)
 /* can't set MTK_SCPD_KEEP_DEFAULT_OFF at the same time */
 #define MTK_SCPD_ALWAYS_ON		BIT(5)
+#define MTK_SCPD_STRICT_BUS_PROTECTION	BIT(6)
 #define MTK_SCPD_CAPS(_scpd, _x)	((_scpd)->data->caps & (_x))
 
 #define SPM_VDE_PWR_CON			0x0210
-- 
2.37.2

Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] soc: mediatek: add support of MTK_SCPD_STRICT_BUSP cap

[AngeloGioacchino Del Regno]

Il 22/08/22 16:43, Markus Schneider-Pargmann ha scritto:
> From: Alexandre Bailon <abailon@baylibre.com>
> 
> This adds support for MTK_SCPD_STRICT_BUSP capability. It is a strict
> bus protection policy that requires the bus protection to be disabled
> before accessing the bus.
> This is required by the mt8365, for the MM power domain.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Bailon <abailon@baylibre.com>
> Signed-off-by: Fabien Parent <fparent@baylibre.com>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@baylibre.com>

You've renamed the cap, but you kept the old name in both the commit description
and title. Please fix that.


> ---
> 
> Notes:
>      Changes in v3:
>      - Rename MTK_SCPD_STRICT_BUSP to MTK_SCPD_STRICT_BUS_PROTECTION
>      - Remove extra bool variable reflecting the capability
>      
>      Changes in v2:
>      - Fixup error handling path.
> 

[PATCH v3 4/4] soc: mediatek: pm-domains: Add support for MT8365

[Markus Schneider-Pargmann]

From: Fabien Parent <fparent@baylibre.com>

Add the needed board data to support MT8365 SoC.

Signed-off-by: Fabien Parent <fparent@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@baylibre.com>
---
 drivers/soc/mediatek/mt8365-pm-domains.h | 147 +++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c    |   5 +
 2 files changed, 152 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 drivers/soc/mediatek/mt8365-pm-domains.h

diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mt8365-pm-domains.h b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mt8365-pm-domains.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..950ff90d5560
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mt8365-pm-domains.h
@@ -0,0 +1,147 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
+
+#ifndef __SOC_MEDIATEK_MT8365_PM_DOMAINS_H
+#define __SOC_MEDIATEK_MT8365_PM_DOMAINS_H
+
+#include "mtk-pm-domains.h"
+#include <dt-bindings/power/mediatek,mt8365-power.h>
+
+/*
+ * MT8365 power domain support
+ */
+
+static const struct scpsys_domain_data scpsys_domain_data_mt8365[] = {
+	[MT8365_POWER_DOMAIN_MM] = {
+		.name = "mm",
+		.sta_mask = PWR_STATUS_DISP,
+		.ctl_offs = 0x30c,
+		.pwr_sta_offs = 0x0180,
+		.pwr_sta2nd_offs = 0x0184,
+		.sram_pdn_bits = GENMASK(8, 8),
+		.sram_pdn_ack_bits = GENMASK(12, 12),
+		.caps = MTK_SCPD_STRICT_BUS_PROTECTION,
+		.bp_infracfg = {
+			BUS_PROT_WR(BIT(16) | BIT(17), 0x2a8, 0x2ac, 0x258),
+			BUS_PROT_WR(BIT(1) | BIT(2) | BIT(10) | BIT(11), 0x2a0, 0x2a4, 0x228),
+			BUS_PROT_WAY_EN(BIT(6), BIT(24), 0x200, 0x0),
+			BUS_PROT_WAY_EN(BIT(5), BIT(14), 0x234, 0x28),
+			BUS_PROT_WR(BIT(6), 0x2a0, 0x2a4, 0x228),
+		},
+	},
+	[MT8365_POWER_DOMAIN_VENC] = {
+		.name = "venc",
+		.sta_mask = PWR_STATUS_VENC,
+		.ctl_offs = 0x0304,
+		.pwr_sta_offs = 0x0180,
+		.pwr_sta2nd_offs = 0x0184,
+		.sram_pdn_bits = GENMASK(8, 8),
+		.sram_pdn_ack_bits = GENMASK(12, 12),
+		.bp_smi = {
+			BUS_PROT_WR(BIT(1), 0x3c4, 0x3c8, 0x3c0),
+		},
+	},
+	[MT8365_POWER_DOMAIN_AUDIO] = {
+		.name = "audio",
+		.sta_mask = PWR_STATUS_AUDIO,
+		.ctl_offs = 0x0314,
+		.pwr_sta_offs = 0x0180,
+		.pwr_sta2nd_offs = 0x0184,
+		.sram_pdn_bits = GENMASK(12, 8),
+		.sram_pdn_ack_bits = GENMASK(17, 13),
+		.bp_infracfg = {
+			BUS_PROT_WR(BIT(27) | BIT(28), 0x2a8, 0x2ac, 0x258),
+		},
+		.caps = MTK_SCPD_ACTIVE_WAKEUP,
+	},
+	[MT8365_POWER_DOMAIN_CONN] = {
+		.name = "conn",
+		.sta_mask = PWR_STATUS_CONN,
+		.ctl_offs = 0x032c,
+		.pwr_sta_offs = 0x0180,
+		.pwr_sta2nd_offs = 0x0184,
+		.sram_pdn_bits = 0,
+		.sram_pdn_ack_bits = 0,
+		.bp_infracfg = {
+			BUS_PROT_WR(BIT(13), 0x2a0, 0x2a4, 0x228),
+			BUS_PROT_WR(BIT(18), 0x2a8, 0x2ac, 0x258),
+			BUS_PROT_WR(BIT(14), 0x2a0, 0x2a4, 0x228),
+			BUS_PROT_WR(BIT(21), 0x2a8, 0x2ac, 0x258),
+		},
+		.caps = MTK_SCPD_ACTIVE_WAKEUP | MTK_SCPD_KEEP_DEFAULT_OFF,
+	},
+	[MT8365_POWER_DOMAIN_MFG] = {
+		.name = "mfg",
+		.sta_mask = PWR_STATUS_MFG,
+		.ctl_offs = 0x0338,
+		.pwr_sta_offs = 0x0180,
+		.pwr_sta2nd_offs = 0x0184,
+		.sram_pdn_bits = GENMASK(9, 8),
+		.sram_pdn_ack_bits = GENMASK(13, 12),
+		.bp_infracfg = {
+			BUS_PROT_WR(BIT(25), 0x2a0, 0x2a4, 0x228),
+			BUS_PROT_WR(BIT(21) | BIT(22), 0x2a0, 0x2a4, 0x228),
+		},
+	},
+	[MT8365_POWER_DOMAIN_CAM] = {
+		.name = "cam",
+		.sta_mask = BIT(25),
+		.ctl_offs = 0x0344,
+		.pwr_sta_offs = 0x0180,
+		.pwr_sta2nd_offs = 0x0184,
+		.sram_pdn_bits = GENMASK(9, 8),
+		.sram_pdn_ack_bits = GENMASK(13, 12),
+		.bp_infracfg = {
+			BUS_PROT_WR(BIT(19), 0x2a8, 0x2ac, 0x258),
+		},
+		.bp_smi = {
+			BUS_PROT_WR(BIT(2), 0x3c4, 0x3c8, 0x3c0),
+		},
+	},
+	[MT8365_POWER_DOMAIN_VDEC] = {
+		.name = "vdec",
+		.sta_mask = BIT(31),
+		.ctl_offs = 0x0370,
+		.pwr_sta_offs = 0x0180,
+		.pwr_sta2nd_offs = 0x0184,
+		.sram_pdn_bits = GENMASK(8, 8),
+		.sram_pdn_ack_bits = GENMASK(12, 12),
+		.bp_smi = {
+			BUS_PROT_WR(BIT(3), 0x3c4, 0x3c8, 0x3c0),
+		},
+	},
+	[MT8365_POWER_DOMAIN_APU] = {
+		.name = "apu",
+		.sta_mask = BIT(16),
+		.ctl_offs = 0x0378,
+		.pwr_sta_offs = 0x0180,
+		.pwr_sta2nd_offs = 0x0184,
+		.sram_pdn_bits = GENMASK(14, 8),
+		.sram_pdn_ack_bits = GENMASK(21, 15),
+		.bp_infracfg = {
+			BUS_PROT_WR(BIT(2) | BIT(20), 0x2a8, 0x2ac, 0x258),
+		},
+		.bp_smi = {
+			BUS_PROT_WR(BIT(4), 0x3c4, 0x3c8, 0x3c0),
+		},
+	},
+	[MT8365_POWER_DOMAIN_DSP] = {
+		.name = "dsp",
+		.sta_mask = BIT(17),
+		.ctl_offs = 0x037C,
+		.pwr_sta_offs = 0x0180,
+		.pwr_sta2nd_offs = 0x0184,
+		.sram_pdn_bits = GENMASK(11, 8),
+		.sram_pdn_ack_bits = GENMASK(15, 12),
+		.bp_infracfg = {
+			BUS_PROT_WR(BIT(24) | BIT(30) | BIT(31), 0x2a8, 0x2ac, 0x258),
+		},
+		.caps = MTK_SCPD_ACTIVE_WAKEUP,
+	},
+};
+
+static const struct scpsys_soc_data mt8365_scpsys_data = {
+	.domains_data = scpsys_domain_data_mt8365,
+	.num_domains = ARRAY_SIZE(scpsys_domain_data_mt8365),
+};
+
+#endif /* __SOC_MEDIATEK_MT8365_PM_DOMAINS_H */
diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c
index d323275aa11c..dbabdd688a1f 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
 #include "mt8186-pm-domains.h"
 #include "mt8192-pm-domains.h"
 #include "mt8195-pm-domains.h"
+#include "mt8365-pm-domains.h"
 
 #define MTK_POLL_DELAY_US		10
 #define MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT		USEC_PER_SEC
@@ -706,6 +707,10 @@ static const struct of_device_id scpsys_of_match[] = {
 		.compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-power-controller",
 		.data = &mt8195_scpsys_data,
 	},
+	{
+		.compatible = "mediatek,mt8365-power-controller",
+		.data = &mt8365_scpsys_data,
+	},
 	{ }
 };
 
-- 
2.37.2