From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
To: Jiqi JQ9 Li <lijq9@lenovo.com>,
"linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"robh+dt@kernel.org" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
"krzk+dt@kernel.org" <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
"conor+dt@kernel.org" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
"mperttunen@nvidia.com" <mperttunen@nvidia.com>,
"jonathanh@nvidia.com" <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
"thierry.reding@gmail.com" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
"mpearson-lenovo@squebb.ca" <mpearson-lenovo@squebb.ca>
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: tegra: Add Lenovo ThinkEdge SE70 device tree
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2026 10:25:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5c50fa19-de1a-4863-ab7c-f6c688260359@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <JH0PR03MB863740C0D777A6A97F479F1A83F02@JH0PR03MB8637.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com>
On 07/07/2026 10:21, Jiqi JQ9 Li wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why do you need bootargs? stdout property does not work?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>> Krzysztof
>>>>>
>>>>> Regarding bootargs – I checked tegra194-p3668.dtsi (which
>>>>> is included by tegra194-p3668-0001.dtsi) and it already
>>>>> defines the chosen node. Following the NVIDIA reference
>>>>> (e.g., tegra194-p2888.dtsi), I'll define it in the main DTS:
>>>>>
>>>>> chosen {
>>>>> bootargs = "console=ttyTCU0,115200";
>>>>> stdout-path = "serial0:115200n8";
>>>>
>>>> No, you only need stdout-path. Drop the bootargs.
>>>>
>>>>> };
>>>>>
>>>>> This ensures compatibility while aligning with the existing
>>>>> Tegra device tree convention.
>>>>
>>>> There is no such thing as compatibility with convention.
>>>>
>>>> Every modern upstream DTS uses stdout-path, not bootargs.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Krzysztof
>>>
>>> Hi Krzysztof,
>>>
>>> Just a gentle ping on this series. The v3 patches were applied to the
>>> CI baseline last week and have been waiting for review.
>>>
>>
>> You received comments here, implement them please.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
> Thank you for your quick reply.
>
> I just wanted to follow up and confirm that the v3 series is now
> available on Patchwork and has passed the automated Sashiko AI review.
>
> You can see the series here:
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-tegra/list/?series=511518
>
> As requested, the key changes from v2 version you reviewed are:
> 1. The baseboard DTSI content has been merged into the main DTS file.
> 2. The bootargs property has been removed from the chosen node; only
> stdout-path is used.
>
> Could you please take another look when you have a moment?
I don't use that Patchwork and maybe you mistaken my role here. So to
clarify: you got everything needed from DT maintainers, so I do not need
to do the same work. You also ping me 6 days after posting, which is
pretty non acceptable ping time. For example my patches for Tegra:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260406064935.27968-4-krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com/
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260429165626.243471-4-krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com/
are unanswered for 3 months...
Best regards,
Krzysztof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-07 8:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-30 9:17 [PATCH v2 0/2] Add Lenovo ThinkEdge SE70 carrier board support Jiqi Li
2026-06-30 9:17 ` [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: tegra: Add lenovo,thinkedge-se70 compatible string Jiqi Li
2026-06-30 9:17 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm64: tegra: Add Lenovo ThinkEdge SE70 device tree Jiqi Li
2026-06-30 10:02 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-06-30 11:04 ` [External] " Jiqi JQ9 Li
2026-06-30 11:11 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-06-30 11:17 ` Jiqi JQ9 Li
2026-07-07 7:13 ` Jiqi JQ9 Li
2026-07-07 8:04 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-07-07 8:21 ` Jiqi JQ9 Li
2026-07-07 8:25 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-07-01 9:06 [PATCH v3 0/2] Add Lenovo ThinkEdge SE70 carrier board support Jiqi Li
2026-07-01 9:06 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm64: tegra: Add Lenovo ThinkEdge SE70 device tree Jiqi Li
2026-07-08 2:22 ` Mikko Perttunen
2026-07-08 3:17 ` [External] " Jiqi JQ9 Li
2026-07-08 5:55 ` Mikko Perttunen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5c50fa19-de1a-4863-ab7c-f6c688260359@kernel.org \
--to=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=lijq9@lenovo.com \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpearson-lenovo@squebb.ca \
--cc=mperttunen@nvidia.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox