From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rob Herring Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/14] bus: ti-sysc: Handle missed no-idle property in addition to no-idle-on-init Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2019 01:41:58 -0500 Message-ID: <5ca06138.1c69fb81.68bd3.106e@mx.google.com> References: <20190325215849.13182-1-tony@atomide.com> <20190325215849.13182-3-tony@atomide.com> Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20190325215849.13182-3-tony@atomide.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Tony Lindgren Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Dave Gerlach , Faiz Abbas , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Keerthy , Nishanth Menon , Peter Ujfalusi , Roger Quadros , Suman Anna , Tero Kristo , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 14:58:37 -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > We have ti,no-idle in use in addition to ti,no-idle-on-init but we're > missing handling for it in the ti-sysc interconnect target module driver. > > Let's also group the idle defines together and update the binding > documentation for it. > > Cc: Rob Herring > Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/bus/ti-sysc.txt | 2 ++ > arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c | 2 ++ > drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c | 5 ++++- > include/linux/platform_data/ti-sysc.h | 5 +++-- > 4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring