Re: [PATCH v4 09/15] arm64: dts: msm8996: thermal: Add interrupt support

Stephen Boyd
2019-09-20T22:09:32Z

Quoting Amit Kucheria (2019-09-20 15:07:25)
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 3:02 PM Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org> wrote:
> >
> > Quoting Amit Kucheria (2019-09-20 14:52:24)
> > > Register upper-lower interrupts for each of the two tsens controllers.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@linaro.org>
> > > ---
> > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi | 60 ++++++++++++++-------------
> > > 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi
> > > index 96c0a481f454..bb763b362c16 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi
> > > @@ -175,8 +175,8 @@
> > >
> > > thermal-zones {
> > > cpu0-thermal {
> > > - polling-delay-passive = <250>;
> > > - polling-delay = <1000>;
> > > + polling-delay-passive = <0>;
> > > + polling-delay = <0>;
> >
> > I thought the plan was to make this unnecessary to change?
>
> IMO that change should be part of a different series to the thermal
> core. I've not actually started working on it yet (traveling for the
> next 10 days or so) but plan to do it.
>

Ok so the plan is to change DT and then change it back? That sounds
quite bad so please fix the thermal core to not care about this before
applying these changes so that we don't churn DT.