From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25DBEC43331 for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 17:53:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EABEA2166E for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 17:53:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=chromium.org header.i=@chromium.org header.b="QLnQadxu" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2389492AbfKGRxc (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Nov 2019 12:53:32 -0500 Received: from mail-pf1-f193.google.com ([209.85.210.193]:39935 "EHLO mail-pf1-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730857AbfKGRxc (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Nov 2019 12:53:32 -0500 Received: by mail-pf1-f193.google.com with SMTP id x28so3048646pfo.6 for ; Thu, 07 Nov 2019 09:53:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :references:subject:from:to:cc:user-agent:date; bh=Z1meOcmCHhy99P4fXRI3J73L34xiXqPe78fR6qMJPVs=; b=QLnQadxuoANQOJKtrxBWYRplFZhr5y7KH/jL1HZUfqjnpptx33kh5lUmPKfYMd9YVQ bARtBN/NJhls2KvlTsfvyJOrlg7c5GH8m9iCM6lxowKjhJid9PCt9TaX3CaTIAuI5u2X BavZrRK9riPOwopN+0xpaTTIfWJCOzob10/DA= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references:subject:from:to:cc :user-agent:date; bh=Z1meOcmCHhy99P4fXRI3J73L34xiXqPe78fR6qMJPVs=; b=hWiYeAT7nDxy8oL1uO3mzzxtqtSSrjYbb8PyFXS64Ydh1+SYg5SP6v61NP/0K9gvr+ dQ/L+y60m9NUZK44CL2H5mu5fVtt5FAkTsX9a7oijbu/V2YuNG7iFGfzUr8E+anc4prs D9ChDqSBe0Lm66iuVpp1YQbRlqz/FoSGGMDnptEwbBe4yBkKdDZ/C7VAMYt2Ft5XEC6A MjPqD1rAciSGz08NZrbI6+RhRQxPcxXfh9P5SCzijeJFIfcaWA6x6lo3Tk6/yCTRxKg5 HLIRfHGJONIkRbRXBWgu0VLBM5yi/TX/++uxBtg4J6AAURnOPOOuitIZc5Oxg5rT7/Qb KjnA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX5oWrmHJ7kXH2UaHoVeOjRggTMkc1q6KU+cP9ZaAWnEPQBOhn4 vLzUpjNZWlwMJvUzm5p4U28i+hP9P1TtWw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy2MPJnmW/pfuOQlOn68cLFkoKu7z0z/loK7nPIfMNOZ6qnq8Gov2lHnZCxa4/yKRoi7GNTAQ== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:83c2:: with SMTP id j2mr5709899pfn.225.1573149211214; Thu, 07 Nov 2019 09:53:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from chromium.org ([2620:15c:202:1:fa53:7765:582b:82b9]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z1sm2579247pju.27.2019.11.07.09.53.30 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 07 Nov 2019 09:53:30 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5dc45a1a.1c69fb81.62b3b.65c6@mx.google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <20191106065017.22144-7-rnayak@codeaurora.org> References: <20191106065017.22144-1-rnayak@codeaurora.org> <20191106065017.22144-7-rnayak@codeaurora.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 06/14] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Add rpmh-rsc node From: Stephen Boyd To: Rajendra Nayak , agross@kernel.org, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, robh+dt@kernel.org Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mka@chromium.org, Maulik Shah , Rajendra Nayak User-Agent: alot/0.8.1 Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2019 09:53:29 -0800 Sender: devicetree-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Quoting Rajendra Nayak (2019-11-05 22:50:09) > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/q= com/sc7180.dtsi > index 61250560c7ef..98c8ab7d613c 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi > @@ -387,6 +388,24 @@ > status =3D "disabled"; > }; > }; > + > + apps_rsc: rsc@18200000 { The node name is non-standard. This has been a problem since sdm845 though so it would be nice if we can invent some new name for this that is standard at some point in the future. > + label =3D "apps_rsc"; Can we remove this property? The value seems minimal given that we can use the dev_name() and get the address in there instead of using a label.