From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 719064343E7; Tue, 11 Aug 2026 14:32:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786458773; cv=none; b=FqAJLZMxxj6gXb+Jw8tnz6xLJ9Jwc8237Da34iMGJa3wivwEiO1OBZ3UU589iX5/DMJaAbHjoseJR4vER22+ACC9Tf8Sdy+RFAeO8RbmTDfD0YZKfdfFAJlwmQHttege/0DvLw5aSwTcoTlUFZCUbMGd2cEkU6oj3MzJbxW8Gxo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786458773; c=relaxed/simple; bh=2FznzG4ydf9U2k5MUHi+JsORAIzn0JqBlHDqTs1P8LU=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=DPcxqu+DOGr2vPltK6PzguwRGG9wxHC1I+XkTAiz4cD9TSd5j/ebEyrB01RsFfVb/Pbs0Hzo/wNSam2ucqQOu1eYK9ZTUMcpSjUROa6vLUOOoqz594BkTri1vcSGJSDACgILRDrUcqCSUy0uDOY1+kduKfYKmogXyhUQl3iqQTs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=HkimPLWh; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="HkimPLWh" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 24F911F00A3D; Tue, 11 Aug 2026 14:32:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1786458772; bh=09Exon060ReBdwsGh/xKbGuadWEbTPQ0czNaH2d0FCs=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=HkimPLWhDPhB9zSyAZMFsdQXQF+Cal53QOS3GMjIPDmnsY2NUxuTyRIXtem8czUtQ m+aKqDrqm8sjo7PXLy2QNjz5PJxlV+d8cgrp4nI7phP9nJrrT+qyeHQaVBlx/oEw/e uHJ5/GdFsVKtCbzgLG3LVv1E0a917uggtuyRwPDv3eZHZEaubG8iV28vwGUnFrvK6i XvtZi8MgjbhPFHp0GXypz7y4UZpr7/zVPMktJ127OW1j7c8qFYy2XClpjvlfGhT/kr N4TWxjfZSaBEGGoKgpL2zBUyjcF+s35vaXpkQ0I4QFDTTDQMZ4Uc9c/ANjT0gCe39Z kya8cvkiaBocA== Message-ID: <5e4fb03d-3ab9-4a45-a271-6f4be5c928f8@kernel.org> Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2026 17:32:45 +0300 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: interconnect: Add Qualcomm IPQ9650 support To: Dmitry Baryshkov , Kathiravan Thirumoorthy , Bjorn Andersson Cc: Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Brian Masney , Konrad Dybcio , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org References: <20260519-ipq9650_icc-v1-0-4d3554c94257@oss.qualcomm.com> <20260519-ipq9650_icc-v1-1-4d3554c94257@oss.qualcomm.com> From: Georgi Djakov Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 8/11/26 1:19 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On Tue, May 19, 2026 at 02:17:05PM +0530, Kathiravan Thirumoorthy wrote: >> Add master/slave IDs for Qualcomm IPQ9650 Network-on-Chip interfaces to >> support the gcc-ipq9650 driver in providing interconnect services via >> the icc-clk framework. > > Please consider adding an explanatory text. Something like: > > On Qualcomm IPQ9650 platform the interconnect busses don't have separate > RPM / RPMh controls. Instead they require direct votes through the GCC. > To unify hardware descriptions (and software interfaces) between this > platform and other Qualcomm platforms, make GCC export corresponding NoC > clocks as interconnects. Add IDs for these Network-on-Chip interfaces. > The GCC schema already defines #interconnect-cells since it was added in > the commit f92b778251ad ("dt-bindings: clock: add Qualcomm IPQ9650 > GCC"). > >> Signed-off-by: Kathiravan Thirumoorthy >> --- >> include/dt-bindings/interconnect/qcom,ipq9650.h | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+) > > Georgi, any feedback from you? Would you ack merging this patch through > the Bjorn's trees? Or would you rather pick it up on your own? > I think it would be best if this goes together with the code that is using it. Acked-by: Georgi Djakov