Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: iio: dac: add mcp4728.yaml

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>]

On 16/07/2023 23:26, Andrea Collamati wrote:
> Add documentation for mcp4728
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Collamati <andrea.collamati@gmail.com>

What changed? Where is the changelog?

Please use scripts/get_maintainers.pl to get a list of necessary people
and lists to CC (and consider --no-git-fallback argument). It might
happen, that command when run on an older kernel, gives you outdated
entries. Therefore please be sure you base your patches on recent Linux
kernel.

> ---
>  .../bindings/iio/dac/microchip,mcp4728.yaml   | 42 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 42 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/dac/microchip,mcp4728.yaml
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/dac/microchip,mcp4728.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/dac/microchip,mcp4728.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..c971d34794db
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/dac/microchip,mcp4728.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/iio/dac/microchip,mcp4728.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Microchip mcp4728 DAC
> +
> +maintainers:
> +  - Andrea Collamati <andrea.collamati@gmail.com>
> +
> +properties:
> +  compatible:
> +    enum:
> +      - microchip,mcp4728

No improvements.


> +  reg:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +
> +  vdd-supply:
> +    description: |
> +      Provides both power and acts as the reference supply on the mcp4728
> +      when Internal Vref is not selected.
> +
> +required:
> +  - compatible
> +  - reg
> +  - vdd-supply
> +
> +additionalProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> +  - |
> +    i2c {
> +        #address-cells = <1>;
> +        #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> +        mcp4728@60 {

This is a friendly reminder during the review process.

It seems my previous comments were not fully addressed. Maybe my
feedback got lost between the quotes, maybe you just forgot to apply it.
Please go back to the previous discussion and either implement all
requested changes or keep discussing them.

All of the comments seem to be ignored. I don't understand why you
decided not to respond to me.

To clarify: there is already binding for it - mcp4725.



Best regards,
Krzysztof