[PATCH 00/12] arm64: dts: qcom: correct UFS pad supply

[PATCH 00/12] arm64: dts: qcom: correct UFS pad supply

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

Hi,

Not tested on hardware.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Krzysztof Kozlowski (12):
  arm64: dts: qcom: sm6125-sprout: drop incorrect UFS phy max current
  arm64: dts: qcom: sm6125-sprout: correct UFS pad supply
  arm64: dts: qcom: sm6115-pro1x: correct UFS pad supply
  arm64: dts: qcom: sm6115p-j606f: correct UFS pad supply
  arm64: dts: qcom: apq8096-db820c: correct UFS pad supply
  arm64: dts: qcom: msm8996-oneplus: correct UFS pad supply
  arm64: dts: qcom: msm8996-gemini: correct UFS pad supply
  arm64: dts: qcom: msm8998-pro1: correct UFS pad supply
  arm64: dts: qcom: msm8998-mtp: correct UFS pad supply
  arm64: dts: qcom: msm8998-oneplus: correct UFS pad supply
  arm64: dts: qcom: msm8998-sagit: correct UFS pad supply
  arm64: dts: qcom: sm4250-billie2: correct UFS pad supply

 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/apq8096-db820c.dts              | 2 +-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996-oneplus-common.dtsi     | 2 +-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996-xiaomi-common.dtsi      | 2 +-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998-fxtec-pro1.dts          | 2 +-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998-mtp.dts                 | 2 +-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998-oneplus-common.dtsi     | 2 +-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998-xiaomi-sagit.dts        | 2 +-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm4250-oneplus-billie2.dts      | 2 +-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6115-fxtec-pro1x.dts          | 2 +-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6115p-lenovo-j606f.dts        | 2 +-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125-xiaomi-laurel-sprout.dts | 4 +---
 11 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

-- 
2.34.1

[PATCH 01/12] arm64: dts: qcom: sm6125-sprout: drop incorrect UFS phy max current

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

Neither bindings nor UFS phy driver use properties like
'vdda-phy-max-microamp' and 'vdda-pll-max-microamp':

  sm6125-xiaomi-laurel-sprout.dtb: phy@4807000: 'vdda-phy-max-microamp', 'vdda-pll-max-microamp' do not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'

Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125-xiaomi-laurel-sprout.dts | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125-xiaomi-laurel-sprout.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125-xiaomi-laurel-sprout.dts
index 272bc85f1719..90b5f22ea9dc 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125-xiaomi-laurel-sprout.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125-xiaomi-laurel-sprout.dts
@@ -406,8 +406,6 @@ &ufs_mem_hc {
 &ufs_mem_phy {
 	vdda-phy-supply = <&vreg_l4a>;
 	vdda-pll-supply = <&vreg_l10a>;
-	vdda-phy-max-microamp = <51400>;
-	vdda-pll-max-microamp = <14200>;
 	vddp-ref-clk-supply = <&vreg_l18a>;
 	status = "okay";
 };
-- 
2.34.1

[PATCH 02/12] arm64: dts: qcom: sm6125-sprout: correct UFS pad supply

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

The Qualcomm UFS phy switched from dedicated driver to QMP phy driver.
Eventually the old driver was removed in commit 02dca8c981b5 ("phy:
qcom: remove ufs qmp phy driver").  The original driver and its binding
used vddp-ref-clk regulator supply, but the new one did not and left the
supply unused.

The Qualcomm UFS phy bindings were also migrated to newer ones and
dropped support for vddp-ref-clk regulator in commit dc5cb63592bd
("dt-bindings: phy: migrate QMP UFS PHY bindings to
qcom,sc8280xp-qmp-ufs-phy.yaml").

It turns out that this regulator, although with inaccurate name
vddp-ref-clk, is actually needed to provide supply for VDD_PX10 (or
similar, depending on the SoC) used by UFS controller.

Bring back handling of this supply by using more appropriate regulator -
UFS controller host supply.  This also fixes dtbs_check warning:

  sm6125-xiaomi-laurel-sprout.dtb: phy@4807000: 'vddp-ref-clk-supply' does not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'

Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125-xiaomi-laurel-sprout.dts | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125-xiaomi-laurel-sprout.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125-xiaomi-laurel-sprout.dts
index 90b5f22ea9dc..a49d3ebb1931 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125-xiaomi-laurel-sprout.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125-xiaomi-laurel-sprout.dts
@@ -400,13 +400,13 @@ &ufs_mem_hc {
 	vccq2-supply = <&vreg_l11a>;
 	vcc-max-microamp = <600000>;
 	vccq2-max-microamp = <600000>;
+	vdd-hba-supply = <&vreg_l18a>;
 	status = "okay";
 };
 
 &ufs_mem_phy {
 	vdda-phy-supply = <&vreg_l4a>;
 	vdda-pll-supply = <&vreg_l10a>;
-	vddp-ref-clk-supply = <&vreg_l18a>;
 	status = "okay";
 };
 
-- 
2.34.1

[PATCH 03/12] arm64: dts: qcom: sm6115-pro1x: correct UFS pad supply

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

The Qualcomm UFS phy switched from dedicated driver to QMP phy driver.
Eventually the old driver was removed in commit 02dca8c981b5 ("phy:
qcom: remove ufs qmp phy driver").  The original driver and its binding
used vddp-ref-clk regulator supply, but the new one did not and left the
supply unused.

The Qualcomm UFS phy bindings were also migrated to newer ones and
dropped support for vddp-ref-clk regulator in commit dc5cb63592bd
("dt-bindings: phy: migrate QMP UFS PHY bindings to
qcom,sc8280xp-qmp-ufs-phy.yaml").

It turns out that this regulator, although with inaccurate name
vddp-ref-clk, is actually needed to provide supply for VDD_PX10 (or
similar, depending on the SoC) used by UFS controller.

Bring back handling of this supply by using more appropriate regulator -
UFS controller host supply.  This also fixes dtbs_check warning:

  sm6115-fxtec-pro1x.dtb: phy@4807000: 'vddp-ref-clk-supply' does not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'

Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6115-fxtec-pro1x.dts | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6115-fxtec-pro1x.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6115-fxtec-pro1x.dts
index 9b70a87906dc..98eb072fa912 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6115-fxtec-pro1x.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6115-fxtec-pro1x.dts
@@ -219,13 +219,13 @@ &ufs_mem_hc {
 	vcc-max-microamp = <600000>;
 	vccq2-supply = <&pm6125_l11a>;
 	vccq2-max-microamp = <600000>;
+	vdd-hba-supply = <&pm6125_l18a>;
 	status = "okay";
 };
 
 &ufs_mem_phy {
 	vdda-phy-supply = <&pm6125_l4a>;
 	vdda-pll-supply = <&pm6125_l12a>;
-	vddp-ref-clk-supply = <&pm6125_l18a>;
 	status = "okay";
 };
 
-- 
2.34.1

[PATCH 04/12] arm64: dts: qcom: sm6115p-j606f: correct UFS pad supply

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

The Qualcomm UFS phy switched from dedicated driver to QMP phy driver.
Eventually the old driver was removed in commit 02dca8c981b5 ("phy:
qcom: remove ufs qmp phy driver").  The original driver and its binding
used vddp-ref-clk regulator supply, but the new one did not and left the
supply unused.

The Qualcomm UFS phy bindings were also migrated to newer ones and
dropped support for vddp-ref-clk regulator in commit dc5cb63592bd
("dt-bindings: phy: migrate QMP UFS PHY bindings to
qcom,sc8280xp-qmp-ufs-phy.yaml").

It turns out that this regulator, although with inaccurate name
vddp-ref-clk, is actually needed to provide supply for VDD_PX10 (or
similar, depending on the SoC) used by UFS controller.

Bring back handling of this supply by using more appropriate regulator -
UFS controller host supply.  This also fixes dtbs_check warning:

  sm6115p-lenovo-j606f.dtb: phy@4807000: 'vddp-ref-clk-supply' does not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'

Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6115p-lenovo-j606f.dts | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6115p-lenovo-j606f.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6115p-lenovo-j606f.dts
index c2d15fc6c96b..54da053a8042 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6115p-lenovo-j606f.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6115p-lenovo-j606f.dts
@@ -344,13 +344,13 @@ &ufs_mem_hc {
 	vcc-max-microamp = <600000>;
 	vccq2-supply = <&pm6125_l11>;
 	vccq2-max-microamp = <600000>;
+	vdd-hba-supply = <&pm6125_l18>;
 	status = "okay";
 };
 
 &ufs_mem_phy {
 	vdda-phy-supply = <&pm6125_l4>;
 	vdda-pll-supply = <&pm6125_l12>;
-	vddp-ref-clk-supply = <&pm6125_l18>;
 	status = "okay";
 };
 
-- 
2.34.1

[PATCH 05/12] arm64: dts: qcom: apq8096-db820c: correct UFS pad supply

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

The Qualcomm UFS phy switched from dedicated driver to QMP phy driver.
Eventually the old driver was removed in commit 02dca8c981b5 ("phy:
qcom: remove ufs qmp phy driver").  The original driver and its binding
used vddp-ref-clk regulator supply, but the new one did not and left the
supply unused.

The Qualcomm UFS phy bindings were also migrated to newer ones and
dropped support for vddp-ref-clk regulator in commit dc5cb63592bd
("dt-bindings: phy: migrate QMP UFS PHY bindings to
qcom,sc8280xp-qmp-ufs-phy.yaml").

It turns out that this regulator, although with inaccurate name
vddp-ref-clk, is actually needed to provide supply for VDD_PX10 (or
similar, depending on the SoC) used by UFS controller.

Bring back handling of this supply by using more appropriate regulator -
UFS controller host supply.  This also fixes dtbs_check warning:

  apq8096-db820c.dtb: phy@627000: 'vddp-ref-clk-supply' does not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'

Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/apq8096-db820c.dts | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/apq8096-db820c.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/apq8096-db820c.dts
index 385b178314db..d2aaff3e0d02 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/apq8096-db820c.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/apq8096-db820c.dts
@@ -1091,7 +1091,6 @@ &ufsphy {
 
 	vdda-phy-supply = <&vreg_l28a_0p925>;
 	vdda-pll-supply = <&vreg_l12a_1p8>;
-	vddp-ref-clk-supply = <&vreg_l25a_1p2>;
 };
 
 &ufshc {
@@ -1100,6 +1099,7 @@ &ufshc {
 	vcc-supply = <&vreg_l20a_2p95>;
 	vccq-supply = <&vreg_l25a_1p2>;
 	vccq2-supply = <&vreg_s4a_1p8>;
+	vdd-hba-supply = <&vreg_l25a_1p2>;
 
 	vcc-max-microamp = <600000>;
 	vccq-max-microamp = <450000>;
-- 
2.34.1

[PATCH 06/12] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8996-oneplus: correct UFS pad supply

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

The Qualcomm UFS phy switched from dedicated driver to QMP phy driver.
Eventually the old driver was removed in commit 02dca8c981b5 ("phy:
qcom: remove ufs qmp phy driver").  The original driver and its binding
used vddp-ref-clk regulator supply, but the new one did not and left the
supply unused.

The Qualcomm UFS phy bindings were also migrated to newer ones and
dropped support for vddp-ref-clk regulator in commit dc5cb63592bd
("dt-bindings: phy: migrate QMP UFS PHY bindings to
qcom,sc8280xp-qmp-ufs-phy.yaml").

It turns out that this regulator, although with inaccurate name
vddp-ref-clk, is actually needed to provide supply for VDD_PX10 (or
similar, depending on the SoC) used by UFS controller.

Bring back handling of this supply by using more appropriate regulator -
UFS controller host supply.  This also fixes dtbs_check warning:

  msm8996-oneplus3t.dtb: phy@627000: 'vddp-ref-clk-supply' does not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'

Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996-oneplus-common.dtsi | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996-oneplus-common.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996-oneplus-common.dtsi
index ec5457508fe6..38035e0db80b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996-oneplus-common.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996-oneplus-common.dtsi
@@ -772,7 +772,6 @@ touch_suspend: touch-suspend-state {
 &ufsphy {
 	vdda-phy-supply = <&vreg_l28a_0p925>;
 	vdda-pll-supply = <&vreg_l12a_1p8>;
-	vddp-ref-clk-supply = <&vreg_l25a_1p2>;
 
 	status = "okay";
 };
@@ -781,6 +780,7 @@ &ufshc {
 	vcc-supply = <&vreg_l20a_2p95>;
 	vccq-supply = <&vreg_l25a_1p2>;
 	vccq2-supply = <&vreg_s4a_1p8>;
+	vdd-hba-supply = <&vreg_l25a_1p2>;
 
 	vcc-max-microamp = <600000>;
 	vccq-max-microamp = <450000>;
-- 
2.34.1

[PATCH 07/12] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8996-gemini: correct UFS pad supply

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

The Qualcomm UFS phy switched from dedicated driver to QMP phy driver.
Eventually the old driver was removed in commit 02dca8c981b5 ("phy:
qcom: remove ufs qmp phy driver").  The original driver and its binding
used vddp-ref-clk regulator supply, but the new one did not and left the
supply unused.

The Qualcomm UFS phy bindings were also migrated to newer ones and
dropped support for vddp-ref-clk regulator in commit dc5cb63592bd
("dt-bindings: phy: migrate QMP UFS PHY bindings to
qcom,sc8280xp-qmp-ufs-phy.yaml").

It turns out that this regulator, although with inaccurate name
vddp-ref-clk, is actually needed to provide supply for VDD_PX10 (or
similar, depending on the SoC) used by UFS controller.

Bring back handling of this supply by using more appropriate regulator -
UFS controller host supply.  This also fixes dtbs_check warning:

  msm8996-xiaomi-gemini.dtb: phy@627000: 'vddp-ref-clk-supply' does not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'

Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996-xiaomi-common.dtsi | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996-xiaomi-common.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996-xiaomi-common.dtsi
index bcd2397eb373..9a4c11c33a17 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996-xiaomi-common.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996-xiaomi-common.dtsi
@@ -419,6 +419,7 @@ &ufshc {
 	vcc-supply = <&vreg_l20a_2p95>;
 	vccq-supply = <&vreg_l25a_1p2>;
 	vccq2-supply = <&vreg_s4a_1p8>;
+	vdd-hba-supply = <&vreg_l25a_1p2>;
 
 	vcc-max-microamp = <600000>;
 	vccq-max-microamp = <450000>;
@@ -430,7 +431,6 @@ &ufsphy {
 
 	vdda-phy-supply = <&vreg_l28a_0p925>;
 	vdda-pll-supply = <&vreg_l12a_1p8>;
-	vddp-ref-clk-supply = <&vreg_l25a_1p2>;
 };
 
 &venus {
-- 
2.34.1

[PATCH 08/12] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8998-pro1: correct UFS pad supply

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

The Qualcomm UFS phy switched from dedicated driver to QMP phy driver.
Eventually the old driver was removed in commit 02dca8c981b5 ("phy:
qcom: remove ufs qmp phy driver").  The original driver and its binding
used vddp-ref-clk regulator supply, but the new one did not and left the
supply unused.

The Qualcomm UFS phy bindings were also migrated to newer ones and
dropped support for vddp-ref-clk regulator in commit dc5cb63592bd
("dt-bindings: phy: migrate QMP UFS PHY bindings to
qcom,sc8280xp-qmp-ufs-phy.yaml").

It turns out that this regulator, although with inaccurate name
vddp-ref-clk, is actually needed to provide supply for VDD_PX10 (or
similar, depending on the SoC) used by UFS controller.

Bring back handling of this supply by using more appropriate regulator -
UFS controller host supply.  This also fixes dtbs_check warning:

  msm8998-fxtec-pro1.dtb: phy@1da7000: 'vddp-ref-clk-supply' does not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'

Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998-fxtec-pro1.dts | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998-fxtec-pro1.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998-fxtec-pro1.dts
index b6a214bea70f..f1ceaedd9520 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998-fxtec-pro1.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998-fxtec-pro1.dts
@@ -671,6 +671,7 @@ &ufshc {
 	vcc-supply = <&vreg_l20a_2p95>;
 	vccq-supply = <&vreg_l26a_1p2>;
 	vccq2-supply = <&vreg_s4a_1p8>;
+	vdd-hba-supply = <&vreg_l26a_1p2>;
 	vcc-max-microamp = <750000>;
 	vccq-max-microamp = <560000>;
 	vccq2-max-microamp = <750000>;
@@ -680,7 +681,6 @@ &ufsphy {
 	status = "okay";
 	vdda-phy-supply = <&vreg_l1a_0p875>;
 	vdda-pll-supply = <&vreg_l2a_1p2>;
-	vddp-ref-clk-supply = <&vreg_l26a_1p2>;
 };
 
 &usb3 {
-- 
2.34.1

[PATCH 09/12] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8998-mtp: correct UFS pad supply

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

The Qualcomm UFS phy switched from dedicated driver to QMP phy driver.
Eventually the old driver was removed in commit 02dca8c981b5 ("phy:
qcom: remove ufs qmp phy driver").  The original driver and its binding
used vddp-ref-clk regulator supply, but the new one did not and left the
supply unused.

The Qualcomm UFS phy bindings were also migrated to newer ones and
dropped support for vddp-ref-clk regulator in commit dc5cb63592bd
("dt-bindings: phy: migrate QMP UFS PHY bindings to
qcom,sc8280xp-qmp-ufs-phy.yaml").

It turns out that this regulator, although with inaccurate name
vddp-ref-clk, is actually needed to provide supply for VDD_PX10 (or
similar, depending on the SoC) used by UFS controller.

Bring back handling of this supply by using more appropriate regulator -
UFS controller host supply.  This also fixes dtbs_check warning:

  msm8998-mtp.dtb: phy@1da7000: 'vddp-ref-clk-supply' does not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'

Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998-mtp.dts | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998-mtp.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998-mtp.dts
index 4319f4da8996..7c77612fb990 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998-mtp.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998-mtp.dts
@@ -412,6 +412,7 @@ &ufshc {
 	vcc-supply = <&vreg_l20a_2p95>;
 	vccq-supply = <&vreg_l26a_1p2>;
 	vccq2-supply = <&vreg_s4a_1p8>;
+	vdd-hba-supply = <&vreg_l26a_1p2>;
 	vcc-max-microamp = <750000>;
 	vccq-max-microamp = <560000>;
 	vccq2-max-microamp = <750000>;
@@ -421,7 +422,6 @@ &ufsphy {
 	status = "okay";
 	vdda-phy-supply = <&vreg_l1a_0p875>;
 	vdda-pll-supply = <&vreg_l2a_1p2>;
-	vddp-ref-clk-supply = <&vreg_l26a_1p2>;
 };
 
 &usb3 {
-- 
2.34.1

[PATCH 10/12] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8998-oneplus: correct UFS pad supply

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

The Qualcomm UFS phy switched from dedicated driver to QMP phy driver.
Eventually the old driver was removed in commit 02dca8c981b5 ("phy:
qcom: remove ufs qmp phy driver").  The original driver and its binding
used vddp-ref-clk regulator supply, but the new one did not and left the
supply unused.

The Qualcomm UFS phy bindings were also migrated to newer ones and
dropped support for vddp-ref-clk regulator in commit dc5cb63592bd
("dt-bindings: phy: migrate QMP UFS PHY bindings to
qcom,sc8280xp-qmp-ufs-phy.yaml").

It turns out that this regulator, although with inaccurate name
vddp-ref-clk, is actually needed to provide supply for VDD_PX10 (or
similar, depending on the SoC) used by UFS controller.

Bring back handling of this supply by using more appropriate regulator -
UFS controller host supply.  This also fixes dtbs_check warning:

  msm8998-oneplus-dumpling.dtb: phy@1da7000: 'vddp-ref-clk-supply' does not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'

Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998-oneplus-common.dtsi | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998-oneplus-common.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998-oneplus-common.dtsi
index 68e634f8212c..e6a69d942a4a 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998-oneplus-common.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998-oneplus-common.dtsi
@@ -534,6 +534,7 @@ &ufshc {
 	vcc-supply = <&vreg_l20a_2p95>;
 	vccq-supply = <&vreg_l26a_1p2>;
 	vccq2-supply = <&vreg_s4a_1p8>;
+	vdd-hba-supply = <&vreg_l26a_1p2>;
 	vcc-max-microamp = <750000>;
 	vccq-max-microamp = <560000>;
 	vccq2-max-microamp = <750000>;
@@ -544,7 +545,6 @@ &ufsphy {
 
 	vdda-phy-supply = <&vreg_l1a_0p875>;
 	vdda-pll-supply = <&vreg_l2a_1p2>;
-	vddp-ref-clk-supply = <&vreg_l26a_1p2>;
 };
 
 &usb3 {
-- 
2.34.1

[PATCH 11/12] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8998-sagit: correct UFS pad supply

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

The Qualcomm UFS phy switched from dedicated driver to QMP phy driver.
Eventually the old driver was removed in commit 02dca8c981b5 ("phy:
qcom: remove ufs qmp phy driver").  The original driver and its binding
used vddp-ref-clk regulator supply, but the new one did not and left the
supply unused.

The Qualcomm UFS phy bindings were also migrated to newer ones and
dropped support for vddp-ref-clk regulator in commit dc5cb63592bd
("dt-bindings: phy: migrate QMP UFS PHY bindings to
qcom,sc8280xp-qmp-ufs-phy.yaml").

It turns out that this regulator, although with inaccurate name
vddp-ref-clk, is actually needed to provide supply for VDD_PX10 (or
similar, depending on the SoC) used by UFS controller.

Bring back handling of this supply by using more appropriate regulator -
UFS controller host supply.  This also fixes dtbs_check warning:

  msm8998-xiaomi-sagit.dtb: phy@1da7000: 'vddp-ref-clk-supply' does not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'

Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998-xiaomi-sagit.dts | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998-xiaomi-sagit.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998-xiaomi-sagit.dts
index 437b30cc8bdc..0cac06f25a77 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998-xiaomi-sagit.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998-xiaomi-sagit.dts
@@ -667,6 +667,7 @@ &ufshc {
 	vcc-supply = <&vreg_l20a_2p95>;
 	vccq-supply = <&vreg_l26a_1p2>;
 	vccq2-supply = <&vreg_s4a_1p8>;
+	vdd-hba-supply = <&vreg_l26a_1p2>;
 	vcc-max-microamp = <750000>;
 	vccq-max-microamp = <560000>;
 	vccq2-max-microamp = <750000>;
@@ -676,7 +677,6 @@ &ufshc {
 &ufsphy {
 	vdda-phy-supply = <&vreg_l1a_0p875>;
 	vdda-pll-supply = <&vreg_l2a_1p2>;
-	vddp-ref-clk-supply = <&vreg_l26a_1p2>;
 	status = "okay";
 };
 
-- 
2.34.1

[PATCH 12/12] arm64: dts: qcom: sm4250-billie2: correct UFS pad supply

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

The Qualcomm UFS phy switched from dedicated driver to QMP phy driver.
Eventually the old driver was removed in commit 02dca8c981b5 ("phy:
qcom: remove ufs qmp phy driver").  The original driver and its binding
used vddp-ref-clk regulator supply, but the new one did not and left the
supply unused.

The Qualcomm UFS phy bindings were also migrated to newer ones and
dropped support for vddp-ref-clk regulator in commit dc5cb63592bd
("dt-bindings: phy: migrate QMP UFS PHY bindings to
qcom,sc8280xp-qmp-ufs-phy.yaml").

It turns out that this regulator, although with inaccurate name
vddp-ref-clk, is actually needed to provide supply for VDD_PX10 (or
similar, depending on the SoC) used by UFS controller.

Bring back handling of this supply by using more appropriate regulator -
UFS controller host supply.  This also fixes dtbs_check warning:

  sm4250-oneplus-billie2.dtb: phy@4807000: 'vddp-ref-clk-supply' does not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'

Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm4250-oneplus-billie2.dts | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm4250-oneplus-billie2.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm4250-oneplus-billie2.dts
index 75951fd439df..2c7a12983dae 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm4250-oneplus-billie2.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm4250-oneplus-billie2.dts
@@ -225,13 +225,13 @@ &ufs_mem_hc {
 	vcc-max-microamp = <600000>;
 	vccq2-supply = <&vreg_l11a>;
 	vccq2-max-microamp = <600000>;
+	vdd-hba-supply = <&vreg_l18a>;
 	status = "okay";
 };
 
 &ufs_mem_phy {
 	vdda-phy-supply = <&vreg_l4a>;
 	vdda-pll-supply = <&vreg_l12a>;
-	vddp-ref-clk-supply = <&vreg_l18a>;
 	status = "okay";
 };
 
-- 
2.34.1

Re: [PATCH 01/12] arm64: dts: qcom: sm6125-sprout: drop incorrect UFS phy max current

[Konrad Dybcio]

On 5.09.2023 18:19, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Neither bindings nor UFS phy driver use properties like
> 'vdda-phy-max-microamp' and 'vdda-pll-max-microamp':
> 
>   sm6125-xiaomi-laurel-sprout.dtb: phy@4807000: 'vdda-phy-max-microamp', 'vdda-pll-max-microamp' do not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
> 
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
> ---
ufshcd_populate_vreg uses this, but looks like nobody added it
to bindings.

Konrad

Re: [PATCH 02/12] arm64: dts: qcom: sm6125-sprout: correct UFS pad supply

[Konrad Dybcio]

On 5.09.2023 18:19, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> The Qualcomm UFS phy switched from dedicated driver to QMP phy driver.
> Eventually the old driver was removed in commit 02dca8c981b5 ("phy:
> qcom: remove ufs qmp phy driver").  The original driver and its binding
> used vddp-ref-clk regulator supply, but the new one did not and left the
> supply unused.
> 
> The Qualcomm UFS phy bindings were also migrated to newer ones and
> dropped support for vddp-ref-clk regulator in commit dc5cb63592bd
> ("dt-bindings: phy: migrate QMP UFS PHY bindings to
> qcom,sc8280xp-qmp-ufs-phy.yaml").
> 
> It turns out that this regulator, although with inaccurate name
> vddp-ref-clk, is actually needed to provide supply for VDD_PX10 (or
> similar, depending on the SoC) used by UFS controller.
> 
> Bring back handling of this supply by using more appropriate regulator -
> UFS controller host supply.  This also fixes dtbs_check warning:
> 
>   sm6125-xiaomi-laurel-sprout.dtb: phy@4807000: 'vddp-ref-clk-supply' does not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
> 
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>

Konrad

Re: [PATCH 03/12] arm64: dts: qcom: sm6115-pro1x: correct UFS pad supply

[Konrad Dybcio]

On 5.09.2023 18:19, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> The Qualcomm UFS phy switched from dedicated driver to QMP phy driver.
> Eventually the old driver was removed in commit 02dca8c981b5 ("phy:
> qcom: remove ufs qmp phy driver").  The original driver and its binding
> used vddp-ref-clk regulator supply, but the new one did not and left the
> supply unused.
> 
> The Qualcomm UFS phy bindings were also migrated to newer ones and
> dropped support for vddp-ref-clk regulator in commit dc5cb63592bd
> ("dt-bindings: phy: migrate QMP UFS PHY bindings to
> qcom,sc8280xp-qmp-ufs-phy.yaml").
> 
> It turns out that this regulator, although with inaccurate name
> vddp-ref-clk, is actually needed to provide supply for VDD_PX10 (or
> similar, depending on the SoC) used by UFS controller.
> 
> Bring back handling of this supply by using more appropriate regulator -
> UFS controller host supply.  This also fixes dtbs_check warning:
> 
>   sm6115-fxtec-pro1x.dtb: phy@4807000: 'vddp-ref-clk-supply' does not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
> 
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>

Konrad

Re: [PATCH 04/12] arm64: dts: qcom: sm6115p-j606f: correct UFS pad supply

[Konrad Dybcio]

On 5.09.2023 18:19, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> The Qualcomm UFS phy switched from dedicated driver to QMP phy driver.
> Eventually the old driver was removed in commit 02dca8c981b5 ("phy:
> qcom: remove ufs qmp phy driver").  The original driver and its binding
> used vddp-ref-clk regulator supply, but the new one did not and left the
> supply unused.
> 
> The Qualcomm UFS phy bindings were also migrated to newer ones and
> dropped support for vddp-ref-clk regulator in commit dc5cb63592bd
> ("dt-bindings: phy: migrate QMP UFS PHY bindings to
> qcom,sc8280xp-qmp-ufs-phy.yaml").
> 
> It turns out that this regulator, although with inaccurate name
> vddp-ref-clk, is actually needed to provide supply for VDD_PX10 (or
> similar, depending on the SoC) used by UFS controller.
> 
> Bring back handling of this supply by using more appropriate regulator -
> UFS controller host supply.  This also fixes dtbs_check warning:
> 
>   sm6115p-lenovo-j606f.dtb: phy@4807000: 'vddp-ref-clk-supply' does not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
> 
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>

Konrad

Re: [PATCH 05/12] arm64: dts: qcom: apq8096-db820c: correct UFS pad supply

[Konrad Dybcio]

On 5.09.2023 18:19, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> The Qualcomm UFS phy switched from dedicated driver to QMP phy driver.
> Eventually the old driver was removed in commit 02dca8c981b5 ("phy:
> qcom: remove ufs qmp phy driver").  The original driver and its binding
> used vddp-ref-clk regulator supply, but the new one did not and left the
> supply unused.
> 
> The Qualcomm UFS phy bindings were also migrated to newer ones and
> dropped support for vddp-ref-clk regulator in commit dc5cb63592bd
> ("dt-bindings: phy: migrate QMP UFS PHY bindings to
> qcom,sc8280xp-qmp-ufs-phy.yaml").
> 
> It turns out that this regulator, although with inaccurate name
> vddp-ref-clk, is actually needed to provide supply for VDD_PX10 (or
> similar, depending on the SoC) used by UFS controller.
> 
> Bring back handling of this supply by using more appropriate regulator -
> UFS controller host supply.  This also fixes dtbs_check warning:
> 
>   apq8096-db820c.dtb: phy@627000: 'vddp-ref-clk-supply' does not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
> 
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>

Konrad

Re: [PATCH 06/12] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8996-oneplus: correct UFS pad supply

[Konrad Dybcio]

On 5.09.2023 18:19, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> The Qualcomm UFS phy switched from dedicated driver to QMP phy driver.
> Eventually the old driver was removed in commit 02dca8c981b5 ("phy:
> qcom: remove ufs qmp phy driver").  The original driver and its binding
> used vddp-ref-clk regulator supply, but the new one did not and left the
> supply unused.
> 
> The Qualcomm UFS phy bindings were also migrated to newer ones and
> dropped support for vddp-ref-clk regulator in commit dc5cb63592bd
> ("dt-bindings: phy: migrate QMP UFS PHY bindings to
> qcom,sc8280xp-qmp-ufs-phy.yaml").
> 
> It turns out that this regulator, although with inaccurate name
> vddp-ref-clk, is actually needed to provide supply for VDD_PX10 (or
> similar, depending on the SoC) used by UFS controller.
> 
> Bring back handling of this supply by using more appropriate regulator -
> UFS controller host supply.  This also fixes dtbs_check warning:
> 
>   msm8996-oneplus3t.dtb: phy@627000: 'vddp-ref-clk-supply' does not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
> 
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>

Konrad

Re: [PATCH 07/12] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8996-gemini: correct UFS pad supply

[Konrad Dybcio]

On 5.09.2023 18:19, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> The Qualcomm UFS phy switched from dedicated driver to QMP phy driver.
> Eventually the old driver was removed in commit 02dca8c981b5 ("phy:
> qcom: remove ufs qmp phy driver").  The original driver and its binding
> used vddp-ref-clk regulator supply, but the new one did not and left the
> supply unused.
> 
> The Qualcomm UFS phy bindings were also migrated to newer ones and
> dropped support for vddp-ref-clk regulator in commit dc5cb63592bd
> ("dt-bindings: phy: migrate QMP UFS PHY bindings to
> qcom,sc8280xp-qmp-ufs-phy.yaml").
> 
> It turns out that this regulator, although with inaccurate name
> vddp-ref-clk, is actually needed to provide supply for VDD_PX10 (or
> similar, depending on the SoC) used by UFS controller.
> 
> Bring back handling of this supply by using more appropriate regulator -
> UFS controller host supply.  This also fixes dtbs_check warning:
> 
>   msm8996-xiaomi-gemini.dtb: phy@627000: 'vddp-ref-clk-supply' does not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
> 
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>

Konrad

Re: [PATCH 08/12] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8998-pro1: correct UFS pad supply

[Konrad Dybcio]

On 5.09.2023 18:19, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> The Qualcomm UFS phy switched from dedicated driver to QMP phy driver.
> Eventually the old driver was removed in commit 02dca8c981b5 ("phy:
> qcom: remove ufs qmp phy driver").  The original driver and its binding
> used vddp-ref-clk regulator supply, but the new one did not and left the
> supply unused.
> 
> The Qualcomm UFS phy bindings were also migrated to newer ones and
> dropped support for vddp-ref-clk regulator in commit dc5cb63592bd
> ("dt-bindings: phy: migrate QMP UFS PHY bindings to
> qcom,sc8280xp-qmp-ufs-phy.yaml").
> 
> It turns out that this regulator, although with inaccurate name
> vddp-ref-clk, is actually needed to provide supply for VDD_PX10 (or
> similar, depending on the SoC) used by UFS controller.
> 
> Bring back handling of this supply by using more appropriate regulator -
> UFS controller host supply.  This also fixes dtbs_check warning:
> 
>   msm8998-fxtec-pro1.dtb: phy@1da7000: 'vddp-ref-clk-supply' does not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
> 
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>

Konrad

Re: [PATCH 09/12] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8998-mtp: correct UFS pad supply

[Konrad Dybcio]

On 5.09.2023 18:19, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> The Qualcomm UFS phy switched from dedicated driver to QMP phy driver.
> Eventually the old driver was removed in commit 02dca8c981b5 ("phy:
> qcom: remove ufs qmp phy driver").  The original driver and its binding
> used vddp-ref-clk regulator supply, but the new one did not and left the
> supply unused.
> 
> The Qualcomm UFS phy bindings were also migrated to newer ones and
> dropped support for vddp-ref-clk regulator in commit dc5cb63592bd
> ("dt-bindings: phy: migrate QMP UFS PHY bindings to
> qcom,sc8280xp-qmp-ufs-phy.yaml").
> 
> It turns out that this regulator, although with inaccurate name
> vddp-ref-clk, is actually needed to provide supply for VDD_PX10 (or
> similar, depending on the SoC) used by UFS controller.
> 
> Bring back handling of this supply by using more appropriate regulator -
> UFS controller host supply.  This also fixes dtbs_check warning:
> 
>   msm8998-mtp.dtb: phy@1da7000: 'vddp-ref-clk-supply' does not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
> 
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>

Konrad

Re: [PATCH 10/12] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8998-oneplus: correct UFS pad supply

[Konrad Dybcio]

On 5.09.2023 18:19, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> The Qualcomm UFS phy switched from dedicated driver to QMP phy driver.
> Eventually the old driver was removed in commit 02dca8c981b5 ("phy:
> qcom: remove ufs qmp phy driver").  The original driver and its binding
> used vddp-ref-clk regulator supply, but the new one did not and left the
> supply unused.
> 
> The Qualcomm UFS phy bindings were also migrated to newer ones and
> dropped support for vddp-ref-clk regulator in commit dc5cb63592bd
> ("dt-bindings: phy: migrate QMP UFS PHY bindings to
> qcom,sc8280xp-qmp-ufs-phy.yaml").
> 
> It turns out that this regulator, although with inaccurate name
> vddp-ref-clk, is actually needed to provide supply for VDD_PX10 (or
> similar, depending on the SoC) used by UFS controller.
> 
> Bring back handling of this supply by using more appropriate regulator -
> UFS controller host supply.  This also fixes dtbs_check warning:
> 
>   msm8998-oneplus-dumpling.dtb: phy@1da7000: 'vddp-ref-clk-supply' does not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
> 
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>

Konrad

Re: [PATCH 11/12] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8998-sagit: correct UFS pad supply

[Konrad Dybcio]

On 5.09.2023 18:19, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> The Qualcomm UFS phy switched from dedicated driver to QMP phy driver.
> Eventually the old driver was removed in commit 02dca8c981b5 ("phy:
> qcom: remove ufs qmp phy driver").  The original driver and its binding
> used vddp-ref-clk regulator supply, but the new one did not and left the
> supply unused.
> 
> The Qualcomm UFS phy bindings were also migrated to newer ones and
> dropped support for vddp-ref-clk regulator in commit dc5cb63592bd
> ("dt-bindings: phy: migrate QMP UFS PHY bindings to
> qcom,sc8280xp-qmp-ufs-phy.yaml").
> 
> It turns out that this regulator, although with inaccurate name
> vddp-ref-clk, is actually needed to provide supply for VDD_PX10 (or
> similar, depending on the SoC) used by UFS controller.
> 
> Bring back handling of this supply by using more appropriate regulator -
> UFS controller host supply.  This also fixes dtbs_check warning:
> 
>   msm8998-xiaomi-sagit.dtb: phy@1da7000: 'vddp-ref-clk-supply' does not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
> 
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>

Konrad

Re: [PATCH 12/12] arm64: dts: qcom: sm4250-billie2: correct UFS pad supply

[Konrad Dybcio]

On 5.09.2023 18:19, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> The Qualcomm UFS phy switched from dedicated driver to QMP phy driver.
> Eventually the old driver was removed in commit 02dca8c981b5 ("phy:
> qcom: remove ufs qmp phy driver").  The original driver and its binding
> used vddp-ref-clk regulator supply, but the new one did not and left the
> supply unused.
> 
> The Qualcomm UFS phy bindings were also migrated to newer ones and
> dropped support for vddp-ref-clk regulator in commit dc5cb63592bd
> ("dt-bindings: phy: migrate QMP UFS PHY bindings to
> qcom,sc8280xp-qmp-ufs-phy.yaml").
> 
> It turns out that this regulator, although with inaccurate name
> vddp-ref-clk, is actually needed to provide supply for VDD_PX10 (or
> similar, depending on the SoC) used by UFS controller.
> 
> Bring back handling of this supply by using more appropriate regulator -
> UFS controller host supply.  This also fixes dtbs_check warning:
> 
>   sm4250-oneplus-billie2.dtb: phy@4807000: 'vddp-ref-clk-supply' does not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
> 
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>

Konrad

Re: [PATCH 01/12] arm64: dts: qcom: sm6125-sprout: drop incorrect UFS phy max current

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 06/09/2023 11:40, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 5.09.2023 18:19, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> Neither bindings nor UFS phy driver use properties like
>> 'vdda-phy-max-microamp' and 'vdda-pll-max-microamp':
>>
>>   sm6125-xiaomi-laurel-sprout.dtb: phy@4807000: 'vdda-phy-max-microamp', 'vdda-pll-max-microamp' do not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
>> ---
> ufshcd_populate_vreg uses this, but looks like nobody added it
> to bindings.

That's UFS controller, not phy. I do not see any usage of it in the phy.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Re: [PATCH 01/12] arm64: dts: qcom: sm6125-sprout: drop incorrect UFS phy max current

[Konrad Dybcio]

On 6.09.2023 11:45, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 06/09/2023 11:40, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> On 5.09.2023 18:19, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> Neither bindings nor UFS phy driver use properties like
>>> 'vdda-phy-max-microamp' and 'vdda-pll-max-microamp':
>>>
>>>   sm6125-xiaomi-laurel-sprout.dtb: phy@4807000: 'vdda-phy-max-microamp', 'vdda-pll-max-microamp' do not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
>>> ---
>> ufshcd_populate_vreg uses this, but looks like nobody added it
>> to bindings.
> 
> That's UFS controller, not phy. I do not see any usage of it in the phy.
Oh right..

Acked-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>

Konrad

Re: [PATCH 00/12] arm64: dts: qcom: correct UFS pad supply

[Bjorn Andersson]

On Tue, 05 Sep 2023 18:19:08 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Not tested on hardware.
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 
> Krzysztof Kozlowski (12):
>   arm64: dts: qcom: sm6125-sprout: drop incorrect UFS phy max current
>   arm64: dts: qcom: sm6125-sprout: correct UFS pad supply
>   arm64: dts: qcom: sm6115-pro1x: correct UFS pad supply
>   arm64: dts: qcom: sm6115p-j606f: correct UFS pad supply
>   arm64: dts: qcom: apq8096-db820c: correct UFS pad supply
>   arm64: dts: qcom: msm8996-oneplus: correct UFS pad supply
>   arm64: dts: qcom: msm8996-gemini: correct UFS pad supply
>   arm64: dts: qcom: msm8998-pro1: correct UFS pad supply
>   arm64: dts: qcom: msm8998-mtp: correct UFS pad supply
>   arm64: dts: qcom: msm8998-oneplus: correct UFS pad supply
>   arm64: dts: qcom: msm8998-sagit: correct UFS pad supply
>   arm64: dts: qcom: sm4250-billie2: correct UFS pad supply
> 
> [...]

Applied, thanks!

[01/12] arm64: dts: qcom: sm6125-sprout: drop incorrect UFS phy max current
        commit: 11bdfe69fb40ca6afdf6bd82946b8197fd7f6c70
[02/12] arm64: dts: qcom: sm6125-sprout: correct UFS pad supply
        commit: 08231f1fe620465890554b107032be330d1c66c7
[03/12] arm64: dts: qcom: sm6115-pro1x: correct UFS pad supply
        commit: 69a9275aeb9adeb223884c9754a8269fe33b0b88
[04/12] arm64: dts: qcom: sm6115p-j606f: correct UFS pad supply
        commit: 131b820c8dedf9516b39f74d82a43c5a0a858583
[05/12] arm64: dts: qcom: apq8096-db820c: correct UFS pad supply
        commit: 6dd6ba6cb3a75fd45e4a48502c184a9659728136
[06/12] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8996-oneplus: correct UFS pad supply
        commit: dfee6788a02c44bbe82a02c58db846ea6edfc630
[07/12] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8996-gemini: correct UFS pad supply
        commit: 38f6ac152fa641dc4a92a9d5f563ed2794f45b12
[08/12] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8998-pro1: correct UFS pad supply
        commit: 304e5c53649f79418cb0e2c5e738a4e1f61729b8
[09/12] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8998-mtp: correct UFS pad supply
        commit: e699305f858e1e18c90001065e156dd9d4646dcc
[10/12] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8998-oneplus: correct UFS pad supply
        commit: 39a123c50f12589949c8ec8b824bb61b94175cc0
[11/12] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8998-sagit: correct UFS pad supply
        commit: c50e34f09a437623fc98b5545b7a097cc9ca53dc
[12/12] arm64: dts: qcom: sm4250-billie2: correct UFS pad supply
        commit: a46e3a82aeb0282f80d6b512f8670da4ed12b973

Best regards,
-- 
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>