From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Neuendorffer Subject: RE: [PATCH] of/flattree: Use common ALIGN() macro instead of archspecific _ALIGN Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 16:36:21 -0700 Message-ID: <5facd128-d48a-4b9e-9b4e-83cabcf33921@SG2EHSMHS003.ehs.local> References: <20100625220300.6903.3519.stgit@angua> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Grant Likely Cc: benh@kernel.crashing.org, monstr@monstr.eu, microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jeremy.kerr@canonical.com, sfr@canb.auug.org.au List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org > -----Original Message----- > From: glikely@secretlab.ca [mailto:glikely@secretlab.ca] On Behalf Of= Grant Likely > Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 4:34 PM > To: Stephen Neuendorffer > Cc: benh@kernel.crashing.org; monstr@monstr.eu; microblaze-uclinux@it= ee.uq.edu.au; devicetree- > discuss@lists.ozlabs.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; jeremy.kerr@c= anonical.com; > sfr@canb.auug.org.au > Subject: Re: [PATCH] of/flattree: Use common ALIGN() macro instead of= archspecific _ALIGN >=20 > On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Stephen Neuendorffer > wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: glikely@secretlab.ca [mailto:glikely@secretlab.ca] On Behalf= Of Grant Likely > >> Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 4:16 PM > >> To: Stephen Neuendorffer > >> Cc: benh@kernel.crashing.org; monstr@monstr.eu; microblaze-uclinux= @itee.uq.edu.au; devicetree- > >> discuss@lists.ozlabs.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; jeremy.ker= r@canonical.com; > >> sfr@canb.auug.org.au > >> Subject: Re: [PATCH] of/flattree: Use common ALIGN() macro instead= of archspecific _ALIGN > >> > >> On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 4:49 PM, Stephen Neuendorffer > >> wrote: > >> > Grant, > >> > > >> > I need this for the PCI project. =A0I also have a couple of othe= r > >> > generalizations of the drivers/of code > >> > to get it to run after boot time in an X86 system... > >> > >> Send me your patches! =A0:-) =A0Get them to me soon and I'll queue= them up > >> for the next merge window. > >> > >> g. > > > > Dangit, I just got the code compiling, and now I find out that X86 = doesn't support out_be32()... =A0:) > > You'd think that somewhere somebody might have realized that all th= e duplicated driver macros that > > do that are a bad idea... >=20 > :-) >=20 > I think iowrite32be should be cross-arch safe. in_*, out_* was mostl= y > a powerpc/sparc thing. >=20 > g. See.. I told you it was a good idea to have that abstracted.. :) S This email and any attachments are intended for the sole use of the nam= ed recipient(s) and contain(s) confidential information that may be pro= prietary, privileged or copyrighted under applicable law. If you are no= t the intended recipient, do not read, copy, or forward this email mess= age or any attachments. Delete this email message and any attachments i= mmediately.