From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sudeep Holla Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: dts: juno: Remove Motherboard USB node Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 14:18:10 +0000 Message-ID: <61d3b621-bb47-c59b-d89f-07636ef8408c@arm.com> References: <74595d6d866518db7cfabc39b4cf9b54d3be9bde.1484741104.git.robin.murphy@arm.com> <39868e0d327456be61aa9ac318fc2d958523a696.1484741104.git.robin.murphy@arm.com> <20170118123802.GE995@e110455-lin.cambridge.arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20170118123802.GE995@e110455-lin.cambridge.arm.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Local user for Liviu Dudau , Robin Murphy Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Sudeep Holla List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 18/01/17 12:38, Local user for Liviu Dudau wrote: > Hi Robin, > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 12:12:52PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote: >> The first batch of Juno boards included a discrete USB controller chip >> as a contingency in case of issues with the USB 2.0 IP integrated into >> the SoC. As it turned out, the latter was fine, and to the best of my >> knowledge the motherboard USB was never even brought up and validated. >> >> Since this also isn't present on later boards, and uses a compatible >> string undocumented and unmatched by any driver in the kernel, let's >> just tidy it away for ever to avoid any confusion. >> >> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy > > For all 3 patches: > > Acked-by: Liviu Dudau > Thanks Liviu (or/and Local user for Liviu Dudau :)) All 3 patches applied to [1] -- Regards, Sudeep [1] git.kernel.org/sudeep.holla/linux/h/for-next/updates/juno