From: Chanwoo Choi <chanwoo@kernel.org>
To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
kernel@pengutronix.de,
Michael Riesch <michael.riesch@wolfvision.net>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll@gmail.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 19/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: add support for RK3588
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2023 07:22:20 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <61da546f-42e6-2c2e-a535-43cacc088bdd@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230704093242.583575-20-s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
On 23. 7. 4. 18:32, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> Add support for the RK3588 to the driver. The RK3588 has four DDR
> channels with a register stride of 0x4000 between the channel
> registers, also it has a DDRMON_CTRL register per channel.
>
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> Reviewed-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
> ---
> drivers/devfreq/event/rockchip-dfi.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> include/soc/rockchip/rk3588_grf.h | 18 +++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 include/soc/rockchip/rk3588_grf.h
>
> diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/event/rockchip-dfi.c b/drivers/devfreq/event/rockchip-dfi.c
> index 2362d3953ba40..9854d4093e186 100644
> --- a/drivers/devfreq/event/rockchip-dfi.c
> +++ b/drivers/devfreq/event/rockchip-dfi.c
> @@ -26,8 +26,9 @@
> #include <soc/rockchip/rockchip_grf.h>
> #include <soc/rockchip/rk3399_grf.h>
> #include <soc/rockchip/rk3568_grf.h>
> +#include <soc/rockchip/rk3588_grf.h>
>
> -#define DMC_MAX_CHANNELS 2
> +#define DMC_MAX_CHANNELS 4
As I mentioned before, need to have the number of channel for each SoC
to reduce the unneeded loop and checking of is statement. Except for it, looks good to me.
>
> #define HIWORD_UPDATE(val, mask) ((val) | (mask) << 16)
>
> @@ -714,9 +715,36 @@ static int rk3568_dfi_init(struct rockchip_dfi *dfi)
> return 0;
> };
>
> +static int rk3588_dfi_init(struct rockchip_dfi *dfi)
> +{
> + struct regmap *regmap_pmu = dfi->regmap_pmu;
> + u32 reg2, reg3, reg4;
> +
> + regmap_read(regmap_pmu, RK3588_PMUGRF_OS_REG2, ®2);
> + regmap_read(regmap_pmu, RK3588_PMUGRF_OS_REG3, ®3);
> + regmap_read(regmap_pmu, RK3588_PMUGRF_OS_REG4, ®4);
> +
> + dfi->ddr_type = FIELD_GET(RK3588_PMUGRF_OS_REG2_DRAMTYPE_INFO, reg2);
> +
> + if (FIELD_GET(RK3588_PMUGRF_OS_REG3_SYSREG_VERSION, reg3) >= 0x3)
> + dfi->ddr_type |= FIELD_GET(RK3588_PMUGRF_OS_REG3_DRAMTYPE_INFO_V3, reg3) << 3;
> +
> + dfi->buswidth[0] = FIELD_GET(RK3588_PMUGRF_OS_REG2_BW_CH0, reg2) == 0 ? 4 : 2;
> + dfi->buswidth[1] = FIELD_GET(RK3588_PMUGRF_OS_REG2_BW_CH1, reg2) == 0 ? 4 : 2;
> + dfi->buswidth[2] = FIELD_GET(RK3568_PMUGRF_OS_REG2_BW_CH0, reg4) == 0 ? 4 : 2;
> + dfi->buswidth[3] = FIELD_GET(RK3588_PMUGRF_OS_REG2_BW_CH1, reg4) == 0 ? 4 : 2;
> + dfi->channel_mask = FIELD_GET(RK3588_PMUGRF_OS_REG2_CH_INFO, reg2) |
> + FIELD_GET(RK3588_PMUGRF_OS_REG2_CH_INFO, reg4) << 2;
> +
> + dfi->ddrmon_stride = 0x4000;
> +
> + return 0;
> +};
> +
> static const struct of_device_id rockchip_dfi_id_match[] = {
> { .compatible = "rockchip,rk3399-dfi", .data = rk3399_dfi_init },
> { .compatible = "rockchip,rk3568-dfi", .data = rk3568_dfi_init },
> + { .compatible = "rockchip,rk3588-dfi", .data = rk3588_dfi_init },
> { },
> };
>
> diff --git a/include/soc/rockchip/rk3588_grf.h b/include/soc/rockchip/rk3588_grf.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..630b35a550640
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/soc/rockchip/rk3588_grf.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ */
> +#ifndef __SOC_RK3588_GRF_H
> +#define __SOC_RK3588_GRF_H
> +
> +#define RK3588_PMUGRF_OS_REG2 0x208
> +#define RK3588_PMUGRF_OS_REG2_DRAMTYPE_INFO GENMASK(15, 13)
> +#define RK3588_PMUGRF_OS_REG2_BW_CH0 GENMASK(3, 2)
> +#define RK3588_PMUGRF_OS_REG2_BW_CH1 GENMASK(19, 18)
> +#define RK3588_PMUGRF_OS_REG2_CH_INFO GENMASK(29, 28)
> +
> +#define RK3588_PMUGRF_OS_REG3 0x20c
> +#define RK3588_PMUGRF_OS_REG3_DRAMTYPE_INFO_V3 GENMASK(13, 12)
> +#define RK3588_PMUGRF_OS_REG3_SYSREG_VERSION GENMASK(31, 28)
> +
> +#define RK3588_PMUGRF_OS_REG4 0x210
> +#define RK3588_PMUGRF_OS_REG5 0x214
> +
> +#endif /* __SOC_RK3588_GRF_H */
--
Best Regards,
Samsung Electronics
Chanwoo Choi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-08 22:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-04 9:32 [PATCH v7 00/26] Add perf support to the rockchip-dfi driver Sascha Hauer
2023-07-04 9:32 ` [PATCH v7 01/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: Make pmu regmap mandatory Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 16:03 ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04 9:32 ` [PATCH v7 02/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: Embed desc into private data struct Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 16:04 ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04 9:32 ` [PATCH v7 03/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: use consistent name for " Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 16:06 ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04 9:32 ` [PATCH v7 04/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: Add SoC specific init function Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 16:22 ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04 9:32 ` [PATCH v7 05/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: dfi store raw values in counter struct Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 16:34 ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04 9:32 ` [PATCH v7 06/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: Use free running counter Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 17:21 ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04 9:32 ` [PATCH v7 07/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: introduce channel mask Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 17:21 ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-10-16 11:22 ` Sascha Hauer
2023-10-16 12:45 ` Sascha Hauer
2023-10-17 8:28 ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04 9:32 ` [PATCH v7 08/26] PM / devfreq: rk3399_dmc,dfi: generalize DDRTYPE defines Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 17:43 ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-10-16 13:10 ` Sascha Hauer
2023-07-04 9:32 ` [PATCH v7 09/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: Clean up DDR type register defines Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 19:11 ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-10-16 12:03 ` Sascha Hauer
2023-10-17 8:34 ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04 9:32 ` [PATCH v7 10/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: Add RK3568 support Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 18:17 ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-10-16 11:34 ` Sascha Hauer
2023-10-17 8:31 ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04 9:32 ` [PATCH v7 11/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: Handle LPDDR2 correctly Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 18:24 ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04 9:32 ` [PATCH v7 12/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: Handle LPDDR4X Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 18:26 ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04 9:32 ` [PATCH v7 13/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: Pass private data struct to internal functions Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 18:28 ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04 9:32 ` [PATCH v7 14/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: Prepare for multiple users Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 18:46 ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04 9:32 ` [PATCH v7 15/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: give variable a better name Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 18:37 ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04 9:32 ` [PATCH v7 16/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: Add perf support Sascha Hauer
2023-10-08 21:48 ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-10-16 12:16 ` Sascha Hauer
2023-10-17 8:35 ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04 9:32 ` [PATCH v7 17/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: make register stride SoC specific Sascha Hauer
2023-10-08 21:57 ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04 9:32 ` [PATCH v7 18/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: account for multiple DDRMON_CTRL registers Sascha Hauer
2023-10-08 22:19 ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-10-16 12:49 ` Sascha Hauer
2023-10-17 8:35 ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04 9:32 ` [PATCH v7 19/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: add support for RK3588 Sascha Hauer
2023-10-08 22:22 ` Chanwoo Choi [this message]
2023-07-04 9:32 ` [PATCH v7 20/26] dt-bindings: devfreq: event: convert Rockchip DFI binding to yaml Sascha Hauer
2023-10-09 0:40 ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04 9:32 ` [PATCH v7 21/26] dt-bindings: devfreq: event: rockchip,dfi: Add rk3568 support Sascha Hauer
2023-10-08 22:24 ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04 9:32 ` [PATCH v7 22/26] dt-bindings: devfreq: event: rockchip,dfi: Add rk3588 support Sascha Hauer
2023-10-08 22:24 ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04 9:32 ` [PATCH v7 23/26] dt-bindings: soc: rockchip: grf: add rockchip,rk3588-pmugrf Sascha Hauer
2023-07-04 9:32 ` [PATCH v7 24/26] arm64: dts: rockchip: rk3399: Enable DFI Sascha Hauer
2023-07-04 9:32 ` [PATCH v7 25/26] arm64: dts: rockchip: rk356x: Add DFI Sascha Hauer
2023-07-04 9:32 ` [PATCH v7 26/26] arm64: dts: rockchip: rk3588s: " Sascha Hauer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=61da546f-42e6-2c2e-a535-43cacc088bdd@kernel.org \
--to=chanwoo@kernel.org \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=michael.riesch@wolfvision.net \
--cc=myungjoo.ham@samsung.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=sebastian.reichel@collabora.com \
--cc=vincent.legoll@gmail.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).