From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] phy: keystone: serdes driver for gbe 10gbe and pcie Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 21:34:51 +0200 Message-ID: <6215485.RTPqreMEMX@wuerfel> References: <1444919145-30845-1-git-send-email-w-kwok2@ti.com> <5192855.p6QLDWTiVi@wuerfel> <561FCDC0.3080109@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <561FCDC0.3080109@ti.com> Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Murali Karicheri Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, WingMan Kwok , robh+dt@kernel.org, pawel.moll@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, galak@codeaurora.org, kishon@ti.com, rogerq@ti.com, bhelgaas@google.com, ssantosh@kernel.org, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 15 October 2015 12:01:04 Murali Karicheri wrote: > > >> + * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright > >> + * notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the > >> + * documentation and/or other materials provided with the > >> + * distribution. > > > > The current code does not do this when compiled, which might be a > > problem for distributors. Can you clarify the license? > > > Arnd, > > Can you elaborate on this? I did a grep on the string "Redistributions > in binary form must reproduce the above copyright" and I could find > several instance of this. So I am not sure what you mean by "The current > code does not do this when compiled". You write that the binary form of the code must produce the copyright notice. I don't see any code that does this. If I was looking in the wrong place, let me know. Arnd