From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dmitry Osipenko Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 02/12] pinctrl: tegra: add suspend and resume support Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 18:29:52 +0300 Message-ID: <6273a790-d4b7-c501-3fec-d9816288b139@gmail.com> References: <1559084936-4610-1-git-send-email-skomatineni@nvidia.com> <1559084936-4610-3-git-send-email-skomatineni@nvidia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1559084936-4610-3-git-send-email-skomatineni@nvidia.com> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Sowjanya Komatineni , thierry.reding@gmail.com, jonathanh@nvidia.com, tglx@linutronix.de, jason@lakedaemon.net, marc.zyngier@arm.com, linus.walleij@linaro.org, stefan@agner.ch, mark.rutland@arm.com Cc: pdeschrijver@nvidia.com, pgaikwad@nvidia.com, sboyd@kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, jckuo@nvidia.com, josephl@nvidia.com, talho@nvidia.com, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mperttunen@nvidia.com, spatra@nvidia.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org 29.05.2019 2:08, Sowjanya Komatineni пишет: > This patch adds suspend and resume support for Tegra pinctrl driver > and registers them to syscore so the pinmux settings are restored > before the devices resume. > > Signed-off-by: Sowjanya Komatineni > --- > drivers/pinctrl/tegra/pinctrl-tegra.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > drivers/pinctrl/tegra/pinctrl-tegra.h | 3 ++ > drivers/pinctrl/tegra/pinctrl-tegra114.c | 1 + > drivers/pinctrl/tegra/pinctrl-tegra124.c | 1 + > drivers/pinctrl/tegra/pinctrl-tegra20.c | 1 + > drivers/pinctrl/tegra/pinctrl-tegra210.c | 1 + > drivers/pinctrl/tegra/pinctrl-tegra30.c | 1 + > 7 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/tegra/pinctrl-tegra.c b/drivers/pinctrl/tegra/pinctrl-tegra.c > index a5008c066bac..bdc47e62c457 100644 > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/tegra/pinctrl-tegra.c > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/tegra/pinctrl-tegra.c > @@ -28,11 +28,18 @@ > #include > #include > #include > +#include > > #include "../core.h" > #include "../pinctrl-utils.h" > #include "pinctrl-tegra.h" > > +#define EMMC2_PAD_CFGPADCTRL_0 0x1c8 > +#define EMMC4_PAD_CFGPADCTRL_0 0x1e0 > +#define EMMC_DPD_PARKING (0x1fff << 14) > + > +static struct tegra_pmx *pmx; > + > static inline u32 pmx_readl(struct tegra_pmx *pmx, u32 bank, u32 reg) > { > return readl(pmx->regs[bank] + reg); > @@ -629,6 +636,50 @@ static void tegra_pinctrl_clear_parked_bits(struct tegra_pmx *pmx) > } > } > > +static int __maybe_unused tegra_pinctrl_suspend(void) > +{ > + u32 *backup_regs = pmx->backup_regs; > + u32 *regs; > + int i, j; > + > + for (i = 0; i < pmx->nbanks; i++) { > + regs = pmx->regs[i]; > + for (j = 0; j < pmx->reg_bank_size[i] / 4; j++) > + *backup_regs++ = readl(regs++); > + } > + > + return pinctrl_force_sleep(pmx->pctl); > +} > + > +static void __maybe_unused tegra_pinctrl_resume(void) > +{ > + u32 *backup_regs = pmx->backup_regs; > + u32 *regs; > + u32 val; > + int i, j; > + > + for (i = 0; i < pmx->nbanks; i++) { > + regs = pmx->regs[i]; > + for (j = 0; j < pmx->reg_bank_size[i] / 4; j++) > + writel(*backup_regs++, regs++); > + } > + > + if (pmx->soc->has_park_padcfg) { > + val = pmx_readl(pmx, 0, EMMC2_PAD_CFGPADCTRL_0); > + val &= ~EMMC_DPD_PARKING; > + pmx_writel(pmx, val, 0, EMMC2_PAD_CFGPADCTRL_0); > + > + val = pmx_readl(pmx, 0, EMMC4_PAD_CFGPADCTRL_0); > + val &= ~EMMC_DPD_PARKING; > + pmx_writel(pmx, val, 0, EMMC4_PAD_CFGPADCTRL_0); > + } > +} > But the CFGPADCTRL registers are already programmed by restoring the backup_regs and hence the relevant EMMC's are already unparked. Hence why do you need to force-unpark both of the EMMC's? What if EMMC is unpopulated on a board, why do you need to unpark it then? -- Dmitry