Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] hwmon: (ina2xx):Add Suppor for passing alert polarity from device tree to driver

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>]

On 12/06/2024 08:18, Amna Waseem wrote:
> On 6/11/24 14:49, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 11/06/2024 11:36, Amna Waseem wrote:
>>> The INA230 has alert polarity bit in Mask/Enable register which can be
>>> configured to be active high or active low depending upon the requirements
>>> of the hardware using this chip. The patches in this series adds the support
>>> for passing alert polarity value from device tree to the driver. Alert polarity
>>> property is added device tree bindings and the driver is modified to read
>>> this property and set the Alert polarity (APOL) bit value in Mask/Enable register
>>> of INA230.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Amna Waseem <Amna.Waseem@axis.com>
>>> ---
>>> Changes in v4:
>>> - Remove unnecessary checks while setting alert polarity bit
>>> - Link to v3: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240603-apol-ina2xx-fix-v3-0-b9eff3158e4e@axis.com
>> <form letter>
>> This is a friendly reminder during the review process.
>>
>> It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.
>>
>> If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
>> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new
>> versions, under or above your Signed-off-by tag. Tag is "received", when
>> provided in a message replied to you on the mailing list. Tools like b4
>> can help here. However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add
>> the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for tags received on the
>> version they apply.
>>
>> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.5-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577
>>
>> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
>> </form letter>
>>
>> Missing this is really odd, considering you are using b4. Please read
>> the b4 guide.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>>
> Thanks Krzysztof for the information. I have read the documentation in 
> the link you provided and I will keep it in mind next time if I submit 
> patches.
> 

So you require someone to re-review?

Best regards,
Krzysztof