From: <Claudiu.Beznea@microchip.com>
To: <Conor.Dooley@microchip.com>, <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
<sboyd@kernel.org>, <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>, <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
<Daire.McNamara@microchip.com>
Cc: <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>, <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
<linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
<nathan@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/14] clk: microchip: mpfs: fix clk_cfg array bounds violation
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2022 07:40:55 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6399e437-37ed-eaac-22fc-34087ea14083@microchip.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220909123123.2699583-2-conor.dooley@microchip.com>
On 09.09.2022 15:31, Conor Dooley wrote:
> There is an array bounds violation present during clock registration,
> triggered by current code by only specific toolchains. This seems to
> fail gracefully in v6.0-rc1, using a toolchain build from the riscv-
> gnu-toolchain repo and with clang-15, and life carries on. While
> converting the driver to use standard clock structs/ops, kernel panics
> were seen during boot when built with clang-15:
>
> [ 0.581754] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000000000000b1
> [ 0.591520] Oops [#1]
> [ 0.594045] Modules linked in:
> [ 0.597435] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.0.0-rc1-00011-g8e1459cf4eca #1
> [ 0.606188] Hardware name: Microchip PolarFire-SoC Icicle Kit (DT)
> [ 0.613012] epc : __clk_register+0x4a6/0x85c
> [ 0.617759] ra : __clk_register+0x49e/0x85c
> [ 0.622489] epc : ffffffff803faf7c ra : ffffffff803faf74 sp : ffffffc80400b720
> [ 0.630466] gp : ffffffff810e93f8 tp : ffffffe77fe60000 t0 : ffffffe77ffb3800
> [ 0.638443] t1 : 000000000000000a t2 : ffffffffffffffff s0 : ffffffc80400b7c0
> [ 0.646420] s1 : 0000000000000001 a0 : 0000000000000001 a1 : 0000000000000000
> [ 0.654396] a2 : 0000000000000001 a3 : 0000000000000000 a4 : 0000000000000000
> [ 0.662373] a5 : ffffffff803a5810 a6 : 0000000200000022 a7 : 0000000000000006
> [ 0.670350] s2 : ffffffff81099d48 s3 : ffffffff80d6e28e s4 : 0000000000000028
> [ 0.678327] s5 : ffffffff810ed3c8 s6 : ffffffff810ed3d0 s7 : ffffffe77ffbc100
> [ 0.686304] s8 : ffffffe77ffb1540 s9 : ffffffe77ffb1540 s10: 0000000000000008
> [ 0.694281] s11: 0000000000000000 t3 : 00000000000000c6 t4 : 0000000000000007
> [ 0.702258] t5 : ffffffff810c78c0 t6 : ffffffe77ff88cd0
> [ 0.708125] status: 0000000200000120 badaddr: 00000000000000b1 cause: 000000000000000d
> [ 0.716869] [<ffffffff803fb892>] devm_clk_hw_register+0x62/0xaa
> [ 0.723420] [<ffffffff80403412>] mpfs_clk_probe+0x1e0/0x244
>
> In v6.0-rc1 and later, this issue is visible without the follow on
> patches doing the conversion using toolchains provided by our Yocto
> meta layer too.
>
> It fails on "clk_periph_timer" - which uses a different parent, that it
> tries to find using the macro:
> \#define PARENT_CLK(PARENT) (&mpfs_cfg_clks[CLK_##PARENT].cfg.hw)
>
> If parent is RTCREF, so the macro becomes: &mpfs_cfg_clks[33].cfg.hw
> which is well beyond the end of the array. Amazingly, builds with GCC
> 11.1 see no problem here, booting correctly and hooking the parent up
> etc. Builds with clang-15 do not, with the above panic.
>
> Change the macro to use specific offsets depending on the parent rather
> than the dt-binding's clock IDs.
>
> Fixes: 1c6a7ea32b8c ("clk: microchip: mpfs: add RTCREF clock control")
> CC: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>
> ---
> drivers/clk/microchip/clk-mpfs.c | 7 ++++++-
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/microchip/clk-mpfs.c b/drivers/clk/microchip/clk-mpfs.c
> index 070c3b896559..f0f9c9a1cc48 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/microchip/clk-mpfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/microchip/clk-mpfs.c
> @@ -239,6 +239,11 @@ static const struct clk_ops mpfs_clk_cfg_ops = {
> .hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT(_name, _parent, &mpfs_clk_cfg_ops, 0), \
> }
>
> +#define CLK_CPU_OFFSET 0u
> +#define CLK_AXI_OFFSET 1u
> +#define CLK_AHB_OFFSET 2u
> +#define CLK_RTCREF_OFFSET 3u
> +
> static struct mpfs_cfg_hw_clock mpfs_cfg_clks[] = {
> CLK_CFG(CLK_CPU, "clk_cpu", "clk_msspll", 0, 2, mpfs_div_cpu_axi_table, 0,
> REG_CLOCK_CONFIG_CR),
> @@ -362,7 +367,7 @@ static const struct clk_ops mpfs_periph_clk_ops = {
> _flags), \
> }
>
> -#define PARENT_CLK(PARENT) (&mpfs_cfg_clks[CLK_##PARENT].hw)
> +#define PARENT_CLK(PARENT) (&mpfs_cfg_clks[CLK_##PARENT##_OFFSET].hw)
>
> /*
> * Critical clocks:
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-12 7:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-09 12:31 [PATCH v5 00/14] PolarFire SoC reset controller & clock cleanups Conor Dooley
2022-09-09 12:31 ` [PATCH v5 01/14] clk: microchip: mpfs: fix clk_cfg array bounds violation Conor Dooley
2022-09-12 7:40 ` Claudiu.Beznea [this message]
2022-09-29 0:30 ` Stephen Boyd
2022-09-29 0:32 ` Stephen Boyd
2022-09-09 12:31 ` [PATCH v5 02/14] clk: microchip: mpfs: make the rtc's ahb clock critical Conor Dooley
2022-09-09 12:31 ` [PATCH v5 03/14] dt-bindings: clk: microchip: mpfs: add reset controller support Conor Dooley
2022-09-09 12:31 ` [PATCH v5 04/14] clk: microchip: mpfs: add reset controller Conor Dooley
2022-09-09 12:31 ` [PATCH v5 05/14] reset: add polarfire soc reset support Conor Dooley
2022-09-09 12:31 ` [PATCH v5 06/14] MAINTAINERS: add polarfire soc reset controller Conor Dooley
2022-09-09 12:31 ` [PATCH v5 07/14] riscv: dts: microchip: add mpfs specific macb reset support Conor Dooley
2023-03-07 15:16 ` Conor Dooley
2022-09-09 12:31 ` [PATCH v5 08/14] clk: microchip: mpfs: add MSS pll's set & round rate Conor Dooley
2022-09-09 12:31 ` [PATCH v5 09/14] clk: microchip: mpfs: move id & offset out of clock structs Conor Dooley
2022-09-09 12:31 ` [PATCH v5 10/14] clk: microchip: mpfs: simplify control reg access Conor Dooley
2022-09-09 12:31 ` [PATCH v5 11/14] clk: microchip: mpfs: delete 2 line mpfs_clk_register_foo() Conor Dooley
2022-09-09 12:31 ` [PATCH v5 12/14] clk: microchip: mpfs: convert cfg_clk to clk_divider Conor Dooley
2022-09-09 12:31 ` [PATCH v5 13/14] clk: microchip: mpfs: convert periph_clk to clk_gate Conor Dooley
2022-09-09 12:31 ` [PATCH v5 14/14] clk: microchip: mpfs: update module authorship & licencing Conor Dooley
2022-09-09 12:34 ` [PATCH v5 00/14] PolarFire SoC reset controller & clock cleanups Conor.Dooley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6399e437-37ed-eaac-22fc-34087ea14083@microchip.com \
--to=claudiu.beznea@microchip.com \
--cc=Conor.Dooley@microchip.com \
--cc=Daire.McNamara@microchip.com \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).