Re: [PATCH v6 1/3] clk: nxp: clk-lpc32xx: rename clk_gate_is_enabled()

[Gabriel FERNANDEZ <gabriel.fernandez-qxv4g6HH51o@public.gmane.org>]

Hi Vladimir,

Many thanks for the code review.


On 07/18/2017 09:48 PM, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> Hello Gabriel,
>
> On 07/18/2017 10:53 AM, gabriel.fernandez@st.com wrote:
>> From: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@st.com>
>>
>> We need to export clk_gate_is_enabled() from clk framework, then
> first of all let's clarify if you really need to export clk_gate_is_enabled()
> from the CCF.
Yes i really need to export clk_gate_is_enabled()

>> to avoid compilation issue we have to rename clk_gate_is_enabled()
>> in NXP LPC32xx clock driver.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@st.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/clk/nxp/clk-lpc32xx.c | 4 ++--
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/nxp/clk-lpc32xx.c b/drivers/clk/nxp/clk-lpc32xx.c
>> index 5b98ff9..1cc71ad 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/nxp/clk-lpc32xx.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/nxp/clk-lpc32xx.c
>> @@ -903,7 +903,7 @@ static void clk_gate_disable(struct clk_hw *hw)
>>   	regmap_update_bits(clk_regmap, clk->reg, mask, val);
>>   }
>>   
>> -static int clk_gate_is_enabled(struct clk_hw *hw)
>> +static int __clk_gate_is_enabled(struct clk_hw *hw)
>>   {
>>   	struct lpc32xx_clk_gate *clk = to_lpc32xx_gate(hw);
>>   	u32 val;
>> @@ -918,7 +918,7 @@ static int clk_gate_is_enabled(struct clk_hw *hw)
>>   static const struct clk_ops lpc32xx_clk_gate_ops = {
>>   	.enable = clk_gate_enable,
>>   	.disable = clk_gate_disable,
>> -	.is_enabled = clk_gate_is_enabled,
>> +	.is_enabled = __clk_gate_is_enabled,
> In case if this change gets continuation, here I want to see the same
> prefixes for all functions and no underscores, namely it shall be
> * lpc32xx_clk_gate_enable(),
> * lpc32xx_clk_gate_disable(),
> * lpc32xx_clk_gate_is_enabled().
ok il will use same prefixes for all functions

Best regards

Gabriel.

>>   };
>>   
>>   #define div_mask(width)	((1 << (width)) - 1)
>>
> --
> With best wishes,
> Vladimir