From: Daniel Schultz <d.schultz@phytec.de>
To: Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com>, "Mendez, Judith" <jm@ti.com>,
Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>, Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Cc: Tero Kristo <kristo@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Hari Nagalla <hnagalla@ti.com>, Beleswar Padhi <b-padhi@ti.com>,
Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@baylibre.com>,
Devarsh Thakkar <devarsht@ti.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 03/11] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62a-mcu: Add R5F remote proc node
Date: Mon, 5 May 2025 18:00:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <646350fd-3dc5-47eb-ab1b-1a6a9acd69a8@phytec.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <31d32966-05fe-4369-afda-3278822d8cb5@ti.com>
Hey,
On 5/5/25 17:22, Andrew Davis wrote:
> On 5/5/25 10:05 AM, Mendez, Judith wrote:
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> On 5/5/2025 4:55 AM, Daniel Schultz wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm unable to load the latest TI firmware
>>> (98efd20ec71f8c1c8f909d34ab656731) with this patch.
>>>
>>> [ 7.012889] remoteproc remoteproc1: 79000000.r5f is available
>>> [ 7.032640] remoteproc remoteproc1: powering up 79000000.r5f
>>> [ 7.038626] remoteproc remoteproc1: Booting fw image am62a-mcu-
>>> r5f0_0-fw, size 53140
>>> [ 7.057209] remoteproc remoteproc1: bad phdr da 0x79100000 mem
>>> 0x47ea0
>
> So this looks like the firmware has sections in the SRAM region. That
> would be the
> issue here.
>
>>> [ 7.064716] remoteproc remoteproc1: Failed to load program
>>> segments: -22
>>>
>>> I figured out that the mcu sram node disappeared in v5. Apparently
>>> adding it back manually doesn't solve this problem. Any idea what's
>>> wrong?
>>
>> For am62ax, there should be several items changed with this v8
>> series in order for remoteproc to work with the TI default firmware:
What firmware did you use? I was using the latest public default
firmware from ti-linux-firmware.
>>
>> 1. memory carveouts were reduced to 15MB [0] & edge-ai memory
>> carveouts are not included here
>
> This shouldn't be an issue, the default firmware doesn't
> use the extended carveouts.
Yes, this is just the echo firmware.
>
>> 2. mcu_sram1 node removed [2]
>>
>
> So when you say you added back the SRAM node, did you also add the
> sram = <&mcu_ram>; in the core node?
With that property added, I can load the firmware again! So, what's the
problem with adding this sram node and did you remove it?
- Daniel
>
> Andrew
>
>> If you want to catch up on the general direction for this series,
>> please refer to [3]. atm remoteproc can fail with the default FW,
>> but we are trying to move away from that firmware and this is the
>> first step in that direction.
>>
>> [0]
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/0ab5c5ec-cde3-41f1-8adf-2419b31497c1@ti.com/
>> [1]
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/04e77daf-e775-44fa-82bf-8b6ebf73bcef@ti.com/
>> [2]
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/32358aa1-0c02-4f4d-9782-2d8376c0d9fc@ti.com/
>> [3]
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/e131298f-3713-482a-a740-ff89709270b4@ti.com/
>>
>> ~ Judith
>>
>>>
>>> On 5/3/25 00:03, Judith Mendez wrote:
>>>> From: Hari Nagalla <hnagalla@ti.com>
>>>>
>>>> AM62A SoCs have a single R5F core in the MCU voltage domain.
>>>> Add the R5FSS node with the child node for core0 in MCU voltage
>>>> domain .dtsi file.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Hari Nagalla <hnagalla@ti.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Judith Mendez <jm@ti.com>
>>>> Acked-by: Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62a-mcu.dtsi | 25
>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62a-mcu.dtsi b/arch/arm64/
>>>> boot/dts/ti/k3-am62a-mcu.dtsi
>>>> index 9ed9d703ff24..ee961ced7208 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62a-mcu.dtsi
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62a-mcu.dtsi
>>>> @@ -174,4 +174,29 @@ mcu_mcan1: can@4e18000 {
>>>> bosch,mram-cfg = <0x0 128 64 64 64 64 32 32>;
>>>> status = "disabled";
>>>> };
>>>> +
>>>> + mcu_r5fss0: r5fss@79000000 {
>>>> + compatible = "ti,am62-r5fss";
>>>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>>>> + #size-cells = <1>;
>>>> + ranges = <0x79000000 0x00 0x79000000 0x8000>,
>>>> + <0x79020000 0x00 0x79020000 0x8000>;
>>>> + power-domains = <&k3_pds 7 TI_SCI_PD_EXCLUSIVE>;
>>>> + status = "disabled";
>>>> +
>>>> + mcu_r5fss0_core0: r5f@79000000 {
>>>> + compatible = "ti,am62-r5f";
>>>> + reg = <0x79000000 0x00008000>,
>>>> + <0x79020000 0x00008000>;
>>>> + reg-names = "atcm", "btcm";
>>>> + resets = <&k3_reset 9 1>;
>>>> + firmware-name = "am62a-mcu-r5f0_0-fw";
>>>> + ti,atcm-enable = <0>;
>>>> + ti,btcm-enable = <1>;
>>>> + ti,loczrama = <0>;
>>>> + ti,sci = <&dmsc>;
>>>> + ti,sci-dev-id = <9>;
>>>> + ti,sci-proc-ids = <0x03 0xff>;
>>>> + };
>>>> + };
>>>> };
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-05 16:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-02 22:03 [PATCH v8 00/11] Add R5F and C7xv device nodes Judith Mendez
2025-05-02 22:03 ` [PATCH v8 01/11] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62: Add ATCM and BTCM cbass ranges Judith Mendez
2025-05-02 22:03 ` [PATCH v8 02/11] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62-wakeup: Add wakeup R5F node Judith Mendez
2025-05-05 9:29 ` Daniel Schultz
2025-05-02 22:03 ` [PATCH v8 03/11] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62a-mcu: Add R5F remote proc node Judith Mendez
2025-05-05 9:55 ` Daniel Schultz
2025-05-05 15:05 ` Mendez, Judith
2025-05-05 15:22 ` Andrew Davis
2025-05-05 16:00 ` Daniel Schultz [this message]
2025-05-05 17:23 ` Andrew Davis
2025-05-06 11:24 ` Daniel Schultz
2025-05-06 11:20 ` Daniel Schultz
2025-05-02 22:03 ` [PATCH v8 04/11] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62a-wakeup: Add R5F device node Judith Mendez
2025-05-05 9:30 ` Daniel Schultz
2025-05-02 22:03 ` [PATCH v8 05/11] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62a-main: Add C7xv " Judith Mendez
2025-05-05 9:29 ` Daniel Schultz
2025-05-02 22:03 ` [PATCH v8 06/11] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62a7-sk: Enable IPC with remote processors Judith Mendez
2025-05-02 22:03 ` [PATCH v8 07/11] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62p5-sk: " Judith Mendez
2025-05-02 22:03 ` [PATCH v8 08/11] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62x-sk-common: " Judith Mendez
2025-05-02 22:03 ` [PATCH v8 09/11] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62a7-sk: Reserve main_timer2 for C7x DSP Judith Mendez
2025-05-02 22:03 ` [PATCH v8 10/11] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62a7-sk: Reserve main_rti4 " Judith Mendez
2025-05-02 22:03 ` [PATCH v8 11/11] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am64: Reserve timers used by MCU FW Judith Mendez
2025-05-06 13:09 ` [PATCH v8 00/11] Add R5F and C7xv device nodes Nishanth Menon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=646350fd-3dc5-47eb-ab1b-1a6a9acd69a8@phytec.de \
--to=d.schultz@phytec.de \
--cc=afd@ti.com \
--cc=b-padhi@ti.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devarsht@ti.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hnagalla@ti.com \
--cc=jm@ti.com \
--cc=kristo@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=msp@baylibre.com \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox