Re: [PATCH 12/13] arm64: defconfig: sync with savedefconfig

[Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>]

On 12/14/23 13:19, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 14/12/2023 13:08, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

Hi, Arnd, Krzysztof,

Thanks for the review!

>> On Thu, Dec 14, 2023, at 11:52, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
>>> Sync the defconfig with savedefconfig as config options
>>> change/move over time.
>>>
>>> Generated with the following commands:
>>> make ARCH=arm64 CROSS_COMPILE=aarch64-linux-gnu- defconfig
>>> make ARCH=arm64 CROSS_COMPILE=aarch64-linux-gnu- savedefconfig
>>> cp defconfig arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
> These are obvious. You cannot do it differently.

This was just a prerequisite patch for the next, where I made a config
builtin. Modifying defconfig shall be made in a similar manner, but it
seems it's not the case (144 line change here), and that's why I
considered it is worth specifying how I did it.

> 
>>> Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>>  arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 144 +++++++++++++----------------------
>>>  1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 89 deletions(-)
>> I usually ask for defconfig changes to be merged when someone just
>> adds a single line per patch, but a 144 line change is clearly too
>> big, please split this up.

The truth is I didn't think we care what configs get removed after a
savedefconfig. I see now after Arnd's review that we have a higher goal
and savedefconfig shall be used to identify misconfiguration.

> Anyway this should not go via my tree, because of possible conflicts.
> This commit, so the savedefconfig, must be prepared on linux-next, which
> should be mentioned in changelog for example. It also is not related to
> this patchset.

Please ignore this patch. Cheers,
ta