Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] cpufreq: qcom-nvmem: support apq8064 cpufreq scaling

[Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>]

On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 02:30:56PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 12-10-23, 10:40, Christian Marangi wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 09:12:41AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > > On 10-10-23, 12:02, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > > > On 02-10-23, 21:59, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > > > > This is a split of APQ8064 cpufreq series, as requested by Viresh. This
> > > > > series includes only opp and cpufreq parts, with the DT and soc parts
> > > > > being split to a separate patchset.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Each core has independent power and frequency control. Additionally the
> > > > > L2 cache is scaled to follow the CPU frequencies (failure to do so
> > > > > results in strange semi-random crashes).
> > > > > 
> > > > > Core voltage is controlled through the SAW2 devices, one for each core.
> > > > > The L2 has two regulators, vdd-mem and vdd-dig.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Changes since v4:
> > > > > - Reordered variables in qcom_cpufreq_init() (Konrad)
> > > > > - Fixed of_platform_device_create() error check (Konrad)
> > > > > - Dropped unused ret variable in qcom_cpufreq_apq8064_name_version() (Konrad)
> > > > 
> > > > Applied. Thanks.
> > > 
> > > Since these are causing build issues, and it isn't entirely clear what's the
> > > right approach for now, I have dropped the changes from my branch to avoid any
> > > further issues. You don't need to resend these, lets finalize a solution and
> > > then I can apply them again.
> > > 
> > 
> > Hi we have a qcom-cpufreq series that depends on this (or better say we
> > have rebased it on top of these changes to prevent merge conflicts)
> 
> That shouldn't be an issue I guess, we are likely not going to change anything
> in these patches but something else:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231011112726.166052-1-dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org/
> 
> > Can you link where this was applied, also can I help in fixing the
> > compile error to speed things up?
> 
> I applied them here earlier.
> 
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vireshk/pm.git opp/linux-next
>

Thanks a lot for the quick answer.

-- 
	Ansuel