Devicetree
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>, Ben Collins <bcollins@watter.com>
Cc: "Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
	"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	"Andrew Hepp" <andrew.hepp@ahepp.dev>,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] dt-bindings: iio: mcp9600: Add compatible for microchip,mcp9601
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2025 13:55:31 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <66063382-78c6-4d93-be25-46e972e390f4@baylibre.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250816105825.35e69652@jic23-huawei>

On 8/16/25 4:58 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Aug 2025 16:46:03 +0000
> Ben Collins <bcollins@watter.com> wrote:
> 
>> The mcp9600 driver supports the mcp9601 chip, but complains about not
>> recognizing the device id on probe. A separate patch...
>>
>> 	iio: mcp9600: Recognize chip id for mcp9601
>>
>> ...addresses this. This patch updates the dt-bindings for this chip to
>> reflect the change to allow explicitly setting microchip,mcp9601 as
>> the expected chip type.
>>
>> The mcp9601 also supports features not found on the mcp9600, so this
>> will also allow the driver to differentiate the support of these
>> features.
> 
> If it's additional features only then you can still use a fallback
> compatible.  Intent being that a new DT vs old kernel still 'works'.
> 
> Then for the driver on new kernels we match on the new compatible and
> support those new features.  Old kernel users get to keep the ID
> mismatch warning - they can upgrade if they want that to go away ;)
> 
> Krzysztof raised the same point on v2 but I'm not seeing it addressed
> in that discussion.

One could make the argument that these are not entirely fallback
compatible since bit 4 of the STATUS register has a different
meaning depending on if the chip is MCP9601/L01/RL01 or not.

Interestingly, the existing bindings include interrupts for
open circuit and short circuit alert pins. But these pins
also only exist on MCP9601/L01/RL01. If we decide these aren't
fallback compatible, then those properties should have the
proper constraints added as well.

> 
> Jonathan
> 
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ben Collins <bcollins@watter.com>
>> ---
>>  .../bindings/iio/temperature/microchip,mcp9600.yaml         | 6 ++++--
>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/temperature/microchip,mcp9600.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/temperature/microchip,mcp9600.yaml
>> index d2cafa38a5442..d8af0912ce886 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/temperature/microchip,mcp9600.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/temperature/microchip,mcp9600.yaml
>> @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
>>  $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/iio/temperature/microchip,mcp9600.yaml#
>>  $schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>>  
>> -title: Microchip MCP9600 thermocouple EMF converter
>> +title: Microchip MCP9600 and similar thermocouple EMF converters
>>  
>>  maintainers:
>>    - Andrew Hepp <andrew.hepp@ahepp.dev>
>> @@ -14,7 +14,9 @@ description:
>>  
>>  properties:
>>    compatible:
>> -    const: microchip,mcp9600
>> +    enum:
>> +      - microchip,mcp9600
>> +      - microchip,mcp9601
>>  
>>    reg:
>>      maxItems: 1
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2025-08-16 18:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-15 16:46 [PATCH 0/5] iio: mcp9600: Features and improvements Ben Collins
2025-08-15 16:46 ` [PATCH 1/5] dt-bindings: iio: mcp9600: Add compatible for microchip,mcp9601 Ben Collins
2025-08-16  9:58   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-16 18:55     ` David Lechner [this message]
2025-08-17 16:37       ` Ben Collins
2025-08-17 16:51         ` David Lechner
2025-08-17 17:34           ` Ben Collins
2025-08-17 17:59             ` David Lechner
2025-08-17 21:02               ` Ben Collins
2025-08-17 21:10                 ` Ben Collins
2025-08-18  6:42                   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-08-16 10:07 ` [PATCH 0/5] iio: mcp9600: Features and improvements Jonathan Cameron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=66063382-78c6-4d93-be25-46e972e390f4@baylibre.com \
    --to=dlechner@baylibre.com \
    --cc=andrew.hepp@ahepp.dev \
    --cc=andy@kernel.org \
    --cc=bcollins@watter.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox