devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
To: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
Cc: "Hauke Mehrtens" <hauke@hauke-m.de>,
	"Rafał Miłecki" <zajec5@gmail.com>,
	"Thomas Bogendoerfer" <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	"Broadcom internal kernel review list"
	<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>,
	"Álvaro Fernández Rojas" <noltari@gmail.com>,
	linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Daniel González Cabanelas" <dgcbueu@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] bmips: dma: drop redundant boot_cpu_type in arch_dma_sync
Date: Fri, 3 May 2024 21:39:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <66353d60.050a0220.df862.761f@mx.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4821338d-bae1-418e-b4a8-6218f62d74dd@broadcom.com>

On Fri, May 03, 2024 at 12:07:45PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 5/3/24 06:54, Christian Marangi wrote:
> > Drop redundant boot_cpu_type in arch_sync_dma_for_cpu_all. These needs
> > to be parsed only once and we can make use of bmips_rac_flush_disable to
> > disable RAC flush on unsupported CPU.
> > 
> > Set this value in bmips_cpu_setup for unsupported CPU to skip this
> > redundant check every time DMA needs to be synced.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
> 
> You are taking a shortcut that is reasonable in premise, but keying off the
> bmips_rac_flush_disable is IMHO misleading. The RAC is enabled in the
> BMIPS5000 and BMIPS5200 cores, just it does not need SW management unlike
> earlier cores.
> 
> If you renamed it to bmips_rac_flush_needed that might be more compelling.
> Also, the other reason is that on a kernel that was configured for
> supporting only BMIPS5000 and BMIPS5200 CPUs, I think we could get some
> decent dead code elimination of the boot_cpu_type() check, which would not
> be the case.

I was a bit confused by the last part, should I drop this or just rename
the variable? Cause I think for kernel that support ONLY those CPU I
guess the DMA function will be optimized anyway since the bool will
always be false I guess?

-- 
	Ansuel

  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-03 19:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-03 13:54 [PATCH 0/6] mips: bmips: improve handling of RAC and CBR addr Christian Marangi
2024-05-03 13:54 ` [PATCH 1/6] mips: bmips: BCM6358: make sure CBR is correctly set Christian Marangi
2024-05-03 13:54 ` [PATCH 2/6] mips: bmips: rework and cache CBR addr handling Christian Marangi
2024-05-03 19:00   ` Florian Fainelli
2024-05-03 13:54 ` [PATCH 3/6] dt-bindings: mips: brcm: Document mips-cbr-reg property Christian Marangi
2024-05-03 16:21   ` Conor Dooley
2024-05-03 19:33     ` Christian Marangi
2024-05-03 20:06       ` Florian Fainelli
2024-05-03 22:14       ` Conor Dooley
2024-05-05 16:05         ` Christian Marangi
2024-05-03 13:54 ` [PATCH 4/6] mips: bmips: setup: make CBR address configurable Christian Marangi
2024-05-03 19:09   ` Florian Fainelli
2024-05-03 19:35     ` Christian Marangi
2024-05-03 21:24       ` Florian Fainelli
2024-05-03 21:27         ` Christian Marangi
2024-05-03 13:54 ` [PATCH 5/6] mips: bmips: enable RAC on BMIPS4350 Christian Marangi
2024-05-03 18:56   ` Florian Fainelli
2024-05-03 21:11     ` Daniel González Cabanelas
2024-05-03 21:15       ` Christian Marangi
2024-05-03 21:34         ` Daniel González Cabanelas
2024-05-03 13:54 ` [PATCH 6/6] bmips: dma: drop redundant boot_cpu_type in arch_dma_sync Christian Marangi
2024-05-03 13:56   ` Christian Marangi
2024-05-03 19:07   ` Florian Fainelli
2024-05-03 19:39     ` Christian Marangi [this message]
2024-05-03 20:08       ` Florian Fainelli
2024-05-03 13:54 ` [PATCH 6/6] mips: " Christian Marangi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=66353d60.050a0220.df862.761f@mx.google.com \
    --to=ansuelsmth@gmail.com \
    --cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dgcbueu@gmail.com \
    --cc=florian.fainelli@broadcom.com \
    --cc=hauke@hauke-m.de \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=noltari@gmail.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=tsbogend@alpha.franken.de \
    --cc=zajec5@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).