devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sam Edwards <cfsworks@gmail.com>
To: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>, "Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	"Daniel Kukieła" <daniel@kukiela.pl>,
	"Sven Rademakers" <sven.rademakers@gmail.com>,
	"Joshua Riek" <jjriek@verizon.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add PCIe pinctrls to Turing RK1
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2023 10:27:10 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <66f413d2-1a5b-b9e3-3c86-35a1d150f486@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6311244.MhkbZ0Pkbq@diego>



On 12/8/23 04:05, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Hi Sam,
> 
> Am Freitag, 8. Dezember 2023, 07:25:10 CET schrieb Sam Edwards:
>> The RK3588 PCIe 3.0 controller seems to have unpredictable behavior when
>> no CLKREQ/PERST/WAKE pins are configured in the pinmux. In particular, it
>> will sometimes (varying between specific RK3588 chips, not over time) shut
>> off the DBI block, and reads to this range will instead stall
>> indefinitely.
>>
>> When this happens, it will prevent Linux from booting altogether. The
>> PCIe driver will stall the CPU core once it attempts to read the version
>> information from the DBI range.
>>
>> Fix this boot hang by adding the correct pinctrl configuration to the
>> PCIe 3.0 device node, which is the proper thing to do anyway. While
>> we're at it, also add the necessary configuration to the PCIe 2.0 node,
>> which may or may not fix the equivalent problem over there -- but is the
>> proper thing to do anyway. :)
>>
>> Fixes: 2806a69f3fef6 ("arm64: dts: rockchip: Add Turing RK1 SoM support")
>> Signed-off-by: Sam Edwards <CFSworks@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Hi list,
>>
>> Compared to v1, v2 removes the `reset-gpios` properties as well -- this should
>> give control of the PCIe resets exclusively to the PCIe cores. (And even if the
>> `reset-gpios` props had no effect in v1, it'd be confusing to have them there.)
> 
> Hmm, I'd think this could result in differing behaviour.
> 
> I.e. I tried the same on a different board with a nvme drive on the pci30x4
> controller. But moving the reset from the gpio-way to "just" setting the
> perstn pinctrl, simply hung the controller when probing the device.

Ah, I'm guessing it died in:
ver = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, PCIE_VERSION_NUMBER);

If so, that's the same hang that this patch is aiming to solve. I'm 
starting to wonder if having muxed pins != 1 for a given signal upsets 
the RC(s). Is your board (in an earlier boot stage: 
reset/maskrom/bootloader) muxing a different perstn pin option to that 
controller (and Linux doesn't know to clear it away)? Then when you add 
the perstn pinctrl the total number of perstns muxed to the controller 
comes to 2, and without a reset-gpios = <...>; to take it away again, 
that number stays at 2 to cause the hang upon the DBI read?

If so, that'd mean the change resolves the hang for me, because it 
brings the total up to 1 (from 0), but also causes the hang for you, 
because it brings the total up to 2 (away from 1).

> 
> So I guess I'd think the best way would be to split the pinctrl up into the
> 3 separate functions (clkreqn, perstn, waken) so that boards can include
> them individually.

Mm, maybe. Though that might be more appropriate if a board comes along 
that doesn't connect all of those signals to the same group of pins. I 
worry that attempting to solve this hang by doing that will instead just 
mask the real problem.

> 
> Nobody is using the controller pinctrl entries so far anyway :-) .

Then it's interesting that this board requires them in order to avoid a 
hang on boot. I'll see if there's anything else that I can find out.

Happy Friday,
Sam

> 
> 
> Heiko
> 
> 
>> Note that it is OK for the pcie2x1l1 node to refer to pcie30x1m1_pins. The
>> pcie2x1l1 device is *in fact* a PCIe 3.0 controller, and the pcie30x1m1_pins
>> pinmux setting is so-named to reflect this. The pcie2x1l1 node is so-named
>> because Linux does not (currently) support routing it to a PCIe 3.0 PHY; so in
>> practice it is effectively a PCIe 2.0 controller, for the time being.
>>
>> Cheers and thank you for your time,
>> Sam
>>
>> ---
>>   .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-turing-rk1.dtsi     | 16 ++--------------
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-turing-rk1.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-turing-rk1.dtsi
>> index 9570b34aca2e..875446fdb67e 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-turing-rk1.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-turing-rk1.dtsi
>> @@ -214,8 +214,7 @@ rgmii_phy: ethernet-phy@1 {
>>   &pcie2x1l1 {
>>   	linux,pci-domain = <1>;
>>   	pinctrl-names = "default";
>> -	pinctrl-0 = <&pcie2_reset>;
>> -	reset-gpios = <&gpio4 RK_PA2 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>> +	pinctrl-0 = <&pcie30x1m1_pins>;
>>   	status = "okay";
>>   };
>>   
>> @@ -226,8 +225,7 @@ &pcie30phy {
>>   &pcie3x4 {
>>   	linux,pci-domain = <0>;
>>   	pinctrl-names = "default";
>> -	pinctrl-0 = <&pcie3_reset>;
>> -	reset-gpios = <&gpio4 RK_PB6 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>> +	pinctrl-0 = <&pcie30x4m1_pins>;
>>   	vpcie3v3-supply = <&vcc3v3_pcie30>;
>>   	status = "okay";
>>   };
>> @@ -245,17 +243,7 @@ hym8563_int: hym8563-int {
>>   		};
>>   	};
>>   
>> -	pcie2 {
>> -		pcie2_reset: pcie2-reset {
>> -			rockchip,pins = <4 RK_PA2 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_none>;
>> -		};
>> -	};
>> -
>>   	pcie3 {
>> -		pcie3_reset: pcie3-reset {
>> -			rockchip,pins = <4 RK_PB6 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_none>;
>> -		};
>> -
>>   		vcc3v3_pcie30_en: pcie3-reg {
>>   			rockchip,pins = <2 RK_PC5 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_none>;
>>   		};
>>
> 
> 
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2023-12-08 17:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-08  6:25 [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add PCIe pinctrls to Turing RK1 Sam Edwards
2023-12-08 11:05 ` Heiko Stübner
2023-12-08 17:27   ` Sam Edwards [this message]
2024-06-05 19:45     ` Jonathan Bennett
2024-07-29 19:09       ` Heiko Stübner
2024-07-31 15:38         ` Sam Edwards

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=66f413d2-1a5b-b9e3-3c86-35a1d150f486@gmail.com \
    --to=cfsworks@gmail.com \
    --cc=daniel@kukiela.pl \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=jjriek@verizon.net \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sven.rademakers@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).