From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wr1-f51.google.com (mail-wr1-f51.google.com [209.85.221.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29A7F1EF363; Thu, 10 Apr 2025 17:23:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.221.51 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744305840; cv=none; b=u8y2kKvxqKpnxkq4e/9mR1N7OKVSuj7yd768TyKymVz6kktuxQWuuGaJ2OXpvz89EDt1cJm8BDyA0vpw+yCwNkKyMSqfvlZJ+tbipvtGm7Qjva4QjPZzKI82W8GRuHhyAw9Y4KkjRvKuG/34wc5SJBgvG7uKi0YZAeGF8mPKGoc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744305840; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ClReNv4tZNKYKHIKcr+3YRA9kSYs6eYQ6ZoMhlVPy0I=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=BsknDtMqTQ4DtiHRVS9ljnerAXaIcnTZoWGbEztwm8IAl2oGihb1BxkdzgpG2s5ksZWsMa7WmeesB4QU47/Ttfdrm92t8NAxg5m4kO/ARQ5/UtAMjT422/ZyrzhAp3JzeCIs7fagWuWQJ5ZfALGwfCA5MpGBhn0rEZRESmuQoho= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=S0gJmHzb; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.221.51 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="S0gJmHzb" Received: by mail-wr1-f51.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-39c0dfad22aso569449f8f.2; Thu, 10 Apr 2025 10:23:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1744305836; x=1744910636; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:subject:cc :to:from:date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=RVEmfdcIK+nAC24P6F8Ud5S0YAAGuFYjRvgCZ39ZrCQ=; b=S0gJmHzbpt4uWdJ5XDWZodPTbEJFbfn4vAjDlsOTNKl/WuUqPCGbaZoYvkHQd6Emef Nof2K+CVxvfrBFL6JTmGKrrxmRsqzLIotk1jAUTPuN6Y++PyykumCTMkRBV+DDjnzMrH GiPotdoonWaPtRsFfEkO2xDHDOBzqz4jMLAMlD1WAv6+usSUmeKuus56WivnEyUJHrrF Y1F+39mLK7vUq15u8qTaclykr4t6lzijCkJe8JCUuB1902ExK/eyh47LCk2RJASC7C3N UkUI3lFd/NgLzbRDgmVGjdq+WG29mu8fRGRh8lx2TzmlljcFn84gqE9XmUgnE3e9FrwQ yotA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1744305836; x=1744910636; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:subject:cc :to:from:date:message-id:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=RVEmfdcIK+nAC24P6F8Ud5S0YAAGuFYjRvgCZ39ZrCQ=; b=TcB6f46/5hRuZWIzJDeTROsR2SXGOTVG3zeN90sy7SGPEvFLG1ZyHklY7hEhjQHxOX vpDz/Y+CsXNG2x7lDQpUdM2tE3ZmD4w2x1ZZM8JGJKi5ZdmDhzKohMdfFX5zsqyA4IB1 uovr8Fx1tb5ETa3jxmKkPn7xAncDDcRw9dyjbVXJVy83+Ehf3XODKlXYxpcICbsWCRVq tRJUvfBB5gBxfe8Dcj1UrrKgRJxmxoCzKJgfR6K1tDCtNJdjiQNq/M5360Cm2QrhFqLN c6itbZhc+uC7Cj2zXUUMAtWMO1aDTjV37tO5DTVKySsFu/BVAov5xld0tP9KoHTNyKX3 gjQA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCU508S7r7LMviC/KniFSNIzAU0rbv1WhPcuvt+G0Zbucmaejr2KHMAeGf1Lihe7WaQpQUoPa8F6A39xT5+9@vger.kernel.org, AJvYcCUVhxMf5BEkPX9FyQGbluINLnPSWgioTU/nZCv0LbCTAKXXvAx2TES9ga77YET/d3f/b0JCAzCw@vger.kernel.org, AJvYcCUsHDLgneAtTeA9fOsCsY9VlW8/s6h4TbczE5UvqAVquU6LNCEAfftCxhdKPvh4nOcn1XINUZZ+4OCp@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yyn5T+7n33/7wdGETsWTzwORUmgeL20sSdAnT9UlNqTprBc1fl9 NzE7TwNfpciMg+skLvnfrdwxE+tjp+hnecEW3qBOQ3bzNStAeBNu X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncsKAdhA+UX/cyfwLXMCv/WWK0vH08SC3jXteNqagf2SH9+16xB3loO7o7nyLeJ fUXUWBEjgjlDdOCHJ2aidrcXxhPes3a1veU/O4cotomzT+0clyUC4DntvWc7ZfL1kLo6m0T+BoB OUA+cF2she86PzeOU84ZNo2I0TZ8PXjM/4XCaIM43bWg15rL8bRjM0EbZihow7prWLup1zw3rpt dhDaGKjJbLLwCvyaNReGU4KDhQ+fp/MPNPaQpmRZtd0FCx9o5UBIqegLQCoYKFnyVL2rzINnElX eOYDDWQDSvvSihG9T49hnBEVsRBLEbFfDzV6H1iQea6qYRox8ts6TFck2S3IdiFjTcLoaZMX6Wc PFO8E3fk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFqhoIbl8rG6Xm1pydrcNvSBmIecSBYlMaEofFIFMZzgUR9B34igWvZcOG2E52kzZjCqGGyAw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:2586:b0:391:3aaf:1d5d with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-39d8f47497bmr3207232f8f.27.1744305836300; Thu, 10 Apr 2025 10:23:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Ansuel-XPS. (93-34-88-225.ip49.fastwebnet.it. [93.34.88.225]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-39d893f0a75sm5495874f8f.62.2025.04.10.10.23.54 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 10 Apr 2025 10:23:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <67f7feab.df0a0220.40a6f.c911@mx.google.com> X-Google-Original-Message-ID: Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 19:23:53 +0200 From: Christian Marangi To: Andrew Lunn Cc: Lee Jones , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Vladimir Oltean , Srinivas Kandagatla , Heiner Kallweit , Russell King , Maxime Chevallier , "Chester A. Unal" , Daniel Golle , DENG Qingfang , Sean Wang , Simon Horman , Matthias Brugger , AngeloGioacchino Del Regno , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, upstream@airoha.com Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v14 06/16] net: mdio: regmap: prepare support for multiple valid addr References: <20250408095139.51659-1-ansuelsmth@gmail.com> <20250408095139.51659-7-ansuelsmth@gmail.com> <6f29a01d-35da-4d51-b309-a1799950a707@lunn.ch> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6f29a01d-35da-4d51-b309-a1799950a707@lunn.ch> On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 07:18:02PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote: > On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 11:51:13AM +0200, Christian Marangi wrote: > > Rework the valid_addr and convert it to a mask in preparation for mdio > > regmap to support multiple valid addr in the case the regmap can support > > it. > > I think it would be good to pull these MDIO regmap patches out into a > series of their own. We know there is a user, so i'm happy for us the > accept it without that user. But this code needs further discusion, > which will be irrelevant for the switch. > Ok so how you would like to proceed for the remaining patch? Repost as RFC? Still waiting feedback for nvmem and mfd so I would love to get feedback for them (that are also irrelevant to the switch) -- Ansuel