Devicetree
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wandun <chenwandun1@gmail.com>
To: Baoquan He <baoquan.he@linux.dev>
Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, chenhuacai@kernel.org,
	pjw@kernel.org, palmer@dabbelt.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu,
	tglx@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
	dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org,
	saravanak@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, rppt@kernel.org,
	pasha.tatashin@soleen.com, pratyush@kernel.org,
	m.szyprowski@samsung.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	kernel@xen0n.name, alex@ghiti.fr, hpa@zytor.com,
	ruirui.yang@linux.dev, robin.murphy@arm.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	iommu@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/10] kdump: reduce vmcore size and capture time
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2026 15:05:44 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6aef2f48-1cc5-408d-a5a2-2b4b4d45ad7b@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <apfkDlcMYrgiuGYA@fedora>



On 9/2/26 16:53, Baoquan He wrote:
> Hi Wandun,
> 
> On 09/02/26 at 03:31pm, Wandun Chen wrote:
>> From: Wandun Chen <chenwandun@lixiang.com>
>>
>> On SoCs that carve out large firmware-owned reserved memory (GPU,
>> camera ISP, ...), kdump currently dumps those carveouts as part of
>> system RAM even though their contents are firmware state that is not
>> useful for kernel crash analysis.
>>
>> This series introduces a MEMBLOCK_NODUMP flag in memblock to filter
>> reserved memory on DT-based architectures (arm64, riscv, loongarch).
>> Reserved regions default are marked MEMBLOCK_NODUMP so kdump omits them;
>> reusable CMA regions are different because their pages are handed back
>> to the buddy allocator and may carry crash-relevant data.
>>
>> ACPI systems already filter reserved memory out of the vmcore through
>> their existing path; only DT-based systems currently fail to filter these
>> regions, which is what this series addresses. The flag lives in memblock
>> itself rather than in a DT-only structure, so the mechanism is generic and
>> both ACPI and DT systems can benefit from it (suggested by Rob, thanks) [1].
> 
> Thanks for the effort. I am not against this patchset, and I haven't
> went through it carefully. Just from the cover letter, you mentioned
> generic, I am wondering if this can be generic for excluding other
> memory regions. Asking this because I try to find a way to exclude
> unwanted memory regions too, please check below link where there's
> the relevant discussion. We definitely don't like inventing wheels
> time after time. Do you think this memblock region excluding can
> be used in other places of kernel?
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/aoLFai0gzzH2bGgy@MiWiFi-R3L-srv/T/#u


Thanks for taking a look, and for the pointer to the crash-wipe thread.

To answer your question directly: the exclusion mechanism in this series
is already generic, memblock_mark_nodump() is the entry point. Any code
that wants a region out of the vmcore just marks it MEMBLOCK_NODUMP, when
preparing vmcore elf header by walking memblock, these regionss are skipped;
This series is simply one caller, marking the DTS /reserved-memory and
/memreserve/ regions with MEMBLOCK_NODUMP.

x86 currently builds the vmcore elf header from iomem_resource, not
memblock; it could be switched to memblock, but that would bring no
benefit for the problem this series solves, so this series makes no
x86 change. I'd personally be in favor of switching to memblock for
a unified implementation across architectures.

Best regards
Wandun


> 
>>
>> Since the reserved memory regions are filtered out, the vmcore is
>> smaller in size and faster to produce. 
>>
>> The series is based on linux-next and is organized as follows:
>>
>> Patches 1-4: Preparation and bugfixes: fix the missing HugeTLB
>>              flagname, switch riscv crash_mem to memblock, fold the
>>              duplicated per-arch memblock walks into the weak
>>              defaults, and serialize crash header preparation against
>>              memory hotplug.
>> Patches 5-9: NODUMP infrastructure: switch crash_core to
>>              for_each_mem_region(), introduce the MEMBLOCK_NODUMP
>>              flag, add a dumpable flag to struct reserved_mem, and
>>              mark /reserved-memory and /memreserve/ entries with
>> 	     MEMBLOCK_NODUMP flag.
>> Patch 10:    Exclude MEMBLOCK_NODUMP regions from the vmcore ELF
>>              header.
>>
>> In v5, Sashiko found some pre-existing issues related to reserved-memory,
>> and has no dependency on this series, so these issues have been addressed
>> in a separate series [2].
>>
>> v5 --> v6:
>> 1. Serialize crash header preparation against memory hotplug to avoid
>>    out-of-bounds or use-after-free issues.
>>
>> 2. MEMBLOCK_NODUMP marking is now done after memblock allows resizing,
>>    avoiding a panic from too few regions before resize is permitted.
>>
>> 3. Reordered the patches, put pre-existing bugfixes earlier in the series.
>>
>>
>> v4 --> v5:
>> 1. Rework the mechanism around a memblock-level MEMBLOCK_NODUMP flag
>>    (suggested by Rob) instead of the v4 opt-in 'dumpable' flag on
>>    DT-only struct reserved_mem.
>> 2. Switch the riscv vmcore elf header preparation to use memblock
>>    instead of the resource tree, aligning it with arm64 and loongarch,
>>    so riscv also can exclude reserved memory from vmcore.
>> 3. Deduplicate the vmcore elf header preparation: arm64, riscv and
>>    loongarch open-coded the same logic, so fold it into shared
>>     __weak defaults in crash_core.
>> 4.  Drop the v4 patch that saved /memreserve/ entries into the
>>     reserved_mem array; /memreserve/ is now marked MEMBLOCK_NODUMP
>>     directly.
>>
>> v3 --> v4:
>> 1. Rebase this series on v7.2-rc1.
>> 2. Add two cleanup patches (patch 02/03).
>> 3. Simplify patch 03 to avoid checking whether initial_boot_params is
>>    NULL multiple times, suggested by Rob.
>>
>> v2 --> v3:
>> 1. Fix out-of-bounds issue if device tree lacks /reserved-memory node.
>> 2. Fix UAF issue when alloc_reserved_mem_array() fails.
>> 3. Add some prepare patches.
>>
>> v1 --> v2:
>> 1. v1 added an opt-out DT property ('linux,no-dump'). Per Rob's
>>    feedback [3], v2 drop that property and exclude reserve memory
>>    by default.
>> 2. Split some prepared patches from the original patches.
>> 3. Address coding-style comments on patch 5 from Rob.
>>
>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260723234126.GA3253409-robh@kernel.org/
>> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260818092420.2859026-1-chenwandun1@gmail.com/
>> [3] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260506144542.GA2072596-robh@kernel.org/
>>
>> Meijing Zhao (1):
>>   mm: memblock: add missing HugeTLB flag name
>>
>> Wandun Chen (9):
>>   riscv: build crash_mem ranges from memblock instead of resource tree
>>   crash_core: fold duplicated memblock arch hooks into the weak default
>>   crash_core: serialize crash header preparation against hotplug
>>   crash_core: replace for_each_mem_range() with for_each_mem_region()
>>   memblock: introduce MEMBLOCK_NODUMP flag
>>   of: reserved_mem: add dumpable flag to opt-in vmcore
>>   of: reserved_mem: mark /reserved-memory entries with MEMBLOCK_NODUMP
>>   of: reserved_mem: mark /memreserve/ entries as MEMBLOCK_NODUMP
>>   crash_core: skip MEMBLOCK_NODUMP regions when building vmcore ELF
>>     header
>>
>>  arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c     | 29 ------------
>>  arch/loongarch/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c | 27 ------------
>>  arch/riscv/Kconfig                         |  2 +-
>>  arch/riscv/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c     | 33 --------------
>>  arch/x86/kernel/crash.c                    |  2 +-
>>  drivers/of/fdt.c                           |  2 +
>>  drivers/of/of_private.h                    |  2 +
>>  drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c               | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>  include/linux/crash_core.h                 |  2 +
>>  include/linux/memblock.h                   |  9 ++++
>>  include/linux/of_reserved_mem.h            |  1 +
>>  kernel/crash_core.c                        | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++--
>>  kernel/dma/contiguous.c                    |  1 +
>>  mm/memblock.c                              | 17 ++++++++
>>  14 files changed, 131 insertions(+), 95 deletions(-)
>>
>> -- 
>> 2.43.0
>>


  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-03  7:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-02  7:31 [PATCH v6 00/10] kdump: reduce vmcore size and capture time Wandun Chen
2026-09-02  7:31 ` [PATCH v6 01/10] mm: memblock: add missing HugeTLB flag name Wandun Chen
2026-09-02  7:43   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02  7:31 ` [PATCH v6 02/10] riscv: build crash_mem ranges from memblock instead of resource tree Wandun Chen
2026-09-02  7:31 ` [PATCH v6 03/10] crash_core: fold duplicated memblock arch hooks into the weak default Wandun Chen
2026-09-02  7:31 ` [PATCH v6 04/10] crash_core: serialize crash header preparation against hotplug Wandun Chen
2026-09-02  7:31 ` [PATCH v6 05/10] crash_core: replace for_each_mem_range() with for_each_mem_region() Wandun Chen
2026-09-02  7:31 ` [PATCH v6 06/10] memblock: introduce MEMBLOCK_NODUMP flag Wandun Chen
2026-09-02  7:31 ` [PATCH v6 07/10] of: reserved_mem: add dumpable flag to opt-in vmcore Wandun Chen
2026-09-02  7:31 ` [PATCH v6 08/10] of: reserved_mem: mark /reserved-memory entries with MEMBLOCK_NODUMP Wandun Chen
2026-09-03  7:32   ` Marek Szyprowski
2026-09-02  7:31 ` [PATCH v6 09/10] of: reserved_mem: mark /memreserve/ entries as MEMBLOCK_NODUMP Wandun Chen
2026-09-02  9:02   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03  7:32   ` Marek Szyprowski
2026-09-02  7:31 ` [PATCH v6 10/10] crash_core: skip MEMBLOCK_NODUMP regions when building vmcore ELF header Wandun Chen
2026-09-02  8:53 ` [PATCH v6 00/10] kdump: reduce vmcore size and capture time Baoquan He
2026-09-03  7:05   ` Wandun [this message]
2026-09-03  7:31     ` Baoquan He
2026-09-03  7:43       ` Wandun
2026-09-03  9:38         ` Baoquan He

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6aef2f48-1cc5-408d-a5a2-2b4b4d45ad7b@gmail.com \
    --to=chenwandun1@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=baoquan.he@linux.dev \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=kernel@xen0n.name \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
    --cc=pjw@kernel.org \
    --cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=ruirui.yang@linux.dev \
    --cc=saravanak@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox