From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jacek Anaszewski Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] leds: as3645a: Add LED flash class driver Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 15:01:47 +0200 Message-ID: <6d27154d-4550-d1ae-8b7a-07dcaaee69ac@gmail.com> References: <1497433639-13101-1-git-send-email-sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> <1497433639-13101-7-git-send-email-sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> <343d88ea-c839-6682-df84-844f92bc9050@gmail.com> <20170614221028.GS12407@valkosipuli.retiisi.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20170614221028.GS12407-S+BSfZ9RZZmRSg0ZkenSGLdO1Tsj/99ntUK59QYPAWc@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Sakari Ailus Cc: Sakari Ailus , linux-media-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-leds-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, sebastian.reichel-ZGY8ohtN/8pPYcu2f3hruQ@public.gmane.org, robh-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, pavel-+ZI9xUNit7I@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Sakari, On 06/15/2017 12:10 AM, Sakari Ailus wrote: > Hi Jacek, > > Thanks for the review! You're welcome! > I have to say I found the v4l2-flash-led-class framework quite useful, now > that I refactored a driver for using it. Now we have a user for the > indicator, too. :-) Nice :-). I'm also surprised that v4l2-flash API is also used in drivers/staging/greybus/light.c which popped up with kbuild test robot complaints. > On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 11:15:24PM +0200, Jacek Anaszewski wrote: >>> +static __maybe_unused int as3645a_suspend(struct device *dev) >>> +{ >>> + struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev); >>> + struct as3645a *flash = i2c_get_clientdata(client); >>> + int rval; >>> + >>> + rval = as3645a_set_control(flash, AS_MODE_EXT_TORCH, false); >>> + dev_dbg(dev, "Suspend %s\n", rval < 0 ? "failed" : "ok"); >>> + >>> + return rval; >>> +} >>> + >>> +static __maybe_unused int as3645a_resume(struct device *dev) >>> +{ >>> + struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev); >>> + struct as3645a *flash = i2c_get_clientdata(client); >>> + int rval; >>> + >>> + rval = as3645a_setup(flash); >>> + >> >> nitpicking: inconsistent coding style - there is no empty line before >> dev_dbg() in the as3645a_suspend(). > > Added one for as3645a_suspend() --- it should have been there. > >> >>> + dev_dbg(dev, "Resume %s\n", rval < 0 ? "fail" : "ok"); >>> + >>> + return rval; >>> +} > > ... > >>> +static int as3645a_led_class_setup(struct as3645a *flash) >>> +{ >>> + struct led_classdev *fled_cdev = &flash->fled.led_cdev; >>> + struct led_classdev *iled_cdev = &flash->iled_cdev; >>> + struct led_flash_setting *cfg; >>> + int rval; >>> + >>> + iled_cdev->name = "as3645a indicator"; >>> + iled_cdev->brightness_set_blocking = as3645a_set_indicator_brightness; >>> + iled_cdev->max_brightness = >>> + flash->cfg.indicator_max_ua / AS_INDICATOR_INTENSITY_STEP; >>> + >>> + rval = led_classdev_register(&flash->client->dev, iled_cdev); >>> + if (rval < 0) >>> + return rval; >>> + >>> + cfg = &flash->fled.brightness; >>> + cfg->min = AS_FLASH_INTENSITY_MIN; >>> + cfg->max = flash->cfg.flash_max_ua; >>> + cfg->step = AS_FLASH_INTENSITY_STEP; >>> + cfg->val = flash->cfg.flash_max_ua; >>> + >>> + cfg = &flash->fled.timeout; >>> + cfg->min = AS_FLASH_TIMEOUT_MIN; >>> + cfg->max = flash->cfg.flash_timeout_us; >>> + cfg->step = AS_FLASH_TIMEOUT_STEP; >>> + cfg->val = flash->cfg.flash_timeout_us; >>> + >>> + flash->fled.ops = &as3645a_led_flash_ops; >>> + >>> + fled_cdev->name = "as3645a flash"; >> >> LED class device name should be taken from label DT property, >> or DT node name if the former wasn't defined. >> >> Also LED device naming convention defines colon as a separator >> between name segments. > > Right. I'll fix that. > > I just realised I'm missing DT binding documentation for this device; I'll > add that, too. > > Is the preference to allow freely chosen node names for the LEDs? Now that > there's the label, too, this appears to be somewhat duplicated information. It depends on whether the sub-leds are identified by reg property. In this case usually common prefix is used followed by reg value, e.g. led@1, led@2 etc. Otherwise prevailing scheme is e.g.: blue-power { ... label = "netxbig:blue:power"; } -- Best regards, Jacek Anaszewski -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html