From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthias Brugger Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] pwm: mediatek: fix pwm source clock selection Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 18:34:17 +0200 Message-ID: <6d74d623-e08d-3552-8d4e-b109d06589c5@gmail.com> References: <1498802721-32455-1-git-send-email-zhi.mao@mediatek.com> <1498802721-32455-3-git-send-email-zhi.mao@mediatek.com> <1499321801.22478.12.camel@mhfsdcap03> <1499323435.22478.26.camel@mhfsdcap03> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1499323435.22478.26.camel@mhfsdcap03> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-pwm-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Zhi Mao Cc: john@phrozen.org, Thierry Reding , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, srv_heupstream@mediatek.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com, yt.shen@mediatek.com, sean.wang@mediatek.com, zhenbao.liu@mediatek.com List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 07/06/2017 08:43 AM, Zhi Mao wrote: > On Thu, 2017-07-06 at 14:16 +0800, Zhi Mao wrote: >> On Wed, 2017-07-05 at 13:09 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote: >>> >>> On 06/30/2017 08:05 AM, Zhi Mao wrote: >>>> In original code, the pwm output frequency is not correct >>>> when set bit<3>=1 to PWMCON register. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Zhi Mao >>>> --- >>>> drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c | 2 +- >>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c >>>> index 5c11bc7..d08b5b3 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c >>>> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c >>>> @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ static int mtk_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, >>>> if (clkdiv > 7) >>>> return -EINVAL; >>>> >>>> - mtk_pwm_writel(pc, pwm->hwpwm, PWMCON, BIT(15) | BIT(3) | clkdiv); >>>> + mtk_pwm_writel(pc, pwm->hwpwm, PWMCON, BIT(15) | clkdiv); >>> >>> Just for clarification, BIT(15) enables old PWM mode, which ignores >>> CLKSEL (BIT(3)). Therefore setting BIT(3) does not have any effect and >>> can be discarded. >>> >>> Am I correct? I took mt7623n datasheet for reference. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Matthias >>> >> Yes, remove setting bit<3> will not take any effect. >> PWMCON bit<3> is pwm source clock selecting register. >> You can check the datasheet of MT7623 for details. >> >> Regards >> Zhi >> > Hi Mattias, > > Ignore the above reply, I explain this bit<3> issue for you. > In the data sheet of MT7623: > PWMCON bit<3> is PWM source clock selecting register > 0: CLK=CLKSRC > 1: CLK=CLKSRC/1625 > for example, > bit<3>=0, PWM clk source is 26M > bit<3>=1, PWM clk source is 16K > The frequency of PWM output will based on this clock source > if set bit<3>=1, it will cause the frequency of PWM output is not > correct. I also use the oscilloscope device to measure the output, > set bit<3>=0, the output meet expectation. > Reviewed-by: Matthias Brugger