Re: [PATCH v4 07/11] dt-bindings: i2c: renesas,riic: Document the R9A08G045 support

[claudiu beznea <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>]

On 19.08.2024 19:39, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 01:22:39PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 19/08/2024 13:10, claudiu beznea wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 19.08.2024 14:05, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 01:23:44PM +0300, Claudiu wrote:
>>>>> From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> Document the Renesas RZ/G3S (R9A08G045) RIIC IP. This is compatible with
>>>>> the version available on Renesas RZ/V2H (R9A09G075).
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>
>>>>> Changes in v4:
>>>>> - added comment near the fallback for RZ/G3S; because of this
>>>>>   dropped Conor's tag
>>>>
>>>> That's not a reason to request a re-review.
> 
> FWIW, I don't care about how many binding patches I do or do not get
> credit for reviewing. 

I had no intention to drop your credit for reviewing this. In the past I
went though situations where reviewer complained due to keeping the tag and
doing very simple adjustment on the next version. I dropped your tag to
avoid that situation here too and mentioned it in the change log.

Thank you,
Claudiu Beznea



> Feel free to give a tag yourself Krzysztof in the
> future if you come across these situations and I'll happily hit ctrl+d
> and remove the thread from my mailbox rather than reply :)
> 
>>>
>>> Sorry for that, I wasn't aware of the procedure for this on bindings.
>>
>> There is no difference. Please read carefully submitting patches,
>> including the chapter about tags.
> 
> Yeah, I don't think this patch is materially different on those
> grounds...
> 
> Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> 
> Cheers,
> Conor.