From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 713FFC00140 for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2022 18:09:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232716AbiHBSJM (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Aug 2022 14:09:12 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57086 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229462AbiHBSJL (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Aug 2022 14:09:11 -0400 Received: from alexa-out-sd-01.qualcomm.com (alexa-out-sd-01.qualcomm.com [199.106.114.38]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E1CB1260C; Tue, 2 Aug 2022 11:09:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=quicinc.com; i=@quicinc.com; q=dns/txt; s=qcdkim; t=1659463750; x=1690999750; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=HnVKc3XQcKkacCwwPqn1Gcys57vujuhNWLXz1cK3oJE=; b=vmmY0LAKxlMl8ThKNSS1/QniKTsKJik/8buGUX0bBhs2kmb4ajsxalsV v85tYdsMK0YnCM7dcSfHmsnH3FeN/A2CcMPWp91Mx4aJKEYYumTxfti9j KSlqtj8KYNC7Hnk06nhcwmWnQHLyP3K8vTMJsSzUKF7wKeNEDy9oYuGcT o=; Received: from unknown (HELO ironmsg02-sd.qualcomm.com) ([10.53.140.142]) by alexa-out-sd-01.qualcomm.com with ESMTP; 02 Aug 2022 11:09:10 -0700 X-QCInternal: smtphost Received: from unknown (HELO nasanex01a.na.qualcomm.com) ([10.52.223.231]) by ironmsg02-sd.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Aug 2022 11:09:09 -0700 Received: from [10.110.16.211] (10.80.80.8) by nasanex01a.na.qualcomm.com (10.52.223.231) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.986.22; Tue, 2 Aug 2022 11:09:08 -0700 Message-ID: <710f2b46-f30a-3d69-4a2c-2c67cb62c80b@quicinc.com> Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2022 11:09:08 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.6.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 0/9] Coresight: Add support for TPDM and TPDA Content-Language: en-US To: Suzuki K Poulose , Jinlong Mao , Mathieu Poirier , Alexander Shishkin , Konrad Dybcio , Mike Leach , Andy Gross , Bjorn Andersson , "Rob Herring" , Krzysztof Kozlowski CC: Leo Yan , Greg Kroah-Hartman , , , , , Tingwei Zhang , Yuanfang Zhang , Tao Zhang , Hao Zhang , References: <20220710021032.27455-1-quic_jinlmao@quicinc.com> <3f714c34-277d-ef71-b527-f758172160f9@quicinc.com> <20260db2-8c7e-e2b6-2385-74f433e4b55e@quicinc.com> <23ae507d-1a01-9a33-52fb-73ac9efca8aa@quicinc.com> <7ff0a9c5-b009-7b45-ac85-8ce26619a00a@arm.com> From: Trilok Soni In-Reply-To: <7ff0a9c5-b009-7b45-ac85-8ce26619a00a@arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.80.80.8] X-ClientProxiedBy: nasanex01a.na.qualcomm.com (10.52.223.231) To nasanex01a.na.qualcomm.com (10.52.223.231) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Suzuki, On 8/2/2022 10:43 AM, Suzuki K Poulose wrote: > Hi Trilok, > > On 02/08/2022 18:33, Trilok Soni wrote: >> >> >> On 8/2/2022 7:43 AM, Jinlong Mao wrote: >>> Hi Reviewers, >>> >>> Please help to review V12 series of TPDM/TPDA patches. >>> >>> Thanks >>> >> >> Suzuki and Mathieu, we are almost there it seems in getting the >> acceptance of these patches, so I hope you find the time to review >> these patches. I guess it is almost a year now for these patches and >> had a good amount of reviews and revisions :) > > This series has been reviewed for the previous versions (which is why > we have it in v12) and this one depends on a series worked on by Mike > Leach. We cannot push this without the dynamic Trace ID allocation > scheme, which is clearly mentioned in the cover letter for this > series. > > As such this series is in a good shape, assuming all the comments > in the previous version has been addressed. So, we would rather > get Mike's work priority and pull that in, so that we can eventually > get this upstream. > > I believe we have addressed all the comments in v12. Are you ok, if we post additional features series (around ~2k to ~3k SLOC)? I just want to make sure we are not creating flood of patches w/ features. ---Trilok Soni